Case Studies

"Yes, I would say we got fewer pages of city comments because the AI had already caught a lot of things that would have come back. Most of the comments are small and insignificant. We will easily wrap this up in only a few days."

— Thomas J. Owens

"The review surfaced the exact plan-check problems we were worried about. Fixing them early saved weeks of back-and-forth."

— Project Team

"We eliminated multiple permit blockers—egress hardware, signage, and accessibility—before submission."

— Project Team

"The overloaded panels and cross-trade coordination issues would have caused major rework. Finding 201 problems across 102 sheets before bid saved us from costly change orders."

— Project Team

"The review surfaced major permit blockers—egress, wind-zone compliance, and system conflicts—before submission."

— Project Team

"We caught multiple code and coordination conflicts before permit review, reducing risk and rework."

— Project Team

"Finding 814 issues before permit submission prevented months of back-and-forth. The fire compartmentalization gaps alone would have been catastrophic."

— Project Team

"Finding 419 issues before permit submission prevented months of delays and costly rework. The fire protection access violations, missing accessible routes, and structural conflicts alone would have failed inspection."

— Project Team

"Finding 420 issues before permit submission prevented months of delays and costly rework. The conflicting engineer seals and license numbers alone would have invalidated the permit set. The foundation type contradiction would have required complete redesign."

— Project Team

"Finding 205 issues before permit submission prevented months of back-and-forth with the city. The cross-connection violation alone would have been a health safety disaster, and the fire rating gaps would have failed inspection immediately."

— Project Team

"Finding 220 issues before permit submission prevented months of delays and costly rework. The egress violations alone would have failed inspection, and the fire protection system conflicts would have required major redesign during construction."

— Project Team