Used by 600+ engineering, architecture, construction and development firms to check drawings, specs, and codes before anything gets built.
Trusted by 600+ engineering, architecture, construction and development firms
$2M+documented rework avoided
“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”
Aaron Bass, Director of Construction
Cold Summit Development
[ Pick your format ]
Retail, homebuilding, QSR, big box and more. Pick one and watch the redlines draw in, each finding cited to the sheet and the code.
Findings
A-201 · 4 flagged
Code
Riser height 7¾ in. exceeds the 7 in. maximum
A-201 · Stair 1 · IBC 1011.5.2
Code
Door clear width 30 in. is below the 32 in. minimum
A-201 · Door 104 · IBC 1010.1.1
Coordination
Supply duct runs through the W12 beam at grid C-2
M-201 ↔ S-201
Spec
Spec calls for lever hardware; door schedule shows knobs
08 71 00 ↔ A-601
+ 2 more on this sheet
Fig. 1 · Pick your format · example sheets, every finding cites the sheet and code section
Watch the 2-minute demo[ How it works ]
Fig. 1 · Permit set, every discipline
STEP 01
Every sheet, drawings and specs together, sorted by discipline.
Fig. 2 · A-201 ↔ M-201 ↔ S-201, one conflict
STEP 02
Code, coordination and spec conflicts across architecture, structure and MEP.
Fig. 3 · Finding, cited to sheet and code
STEP 03
Each finding points to the sheet, the snippet and the code section.
From missed details to code and coordination errors. Real findings from published case studies.
STRUCTURAL · SHEET SET
− issue on the drawings
+ flagged, cited to ASCE 7-16
Incorrect Designation of Basic Wind Speed vs. Nominal Wind Speed
Open the case fileMULTI-DISCIPLINE · SHEET SET
− issue on the drawings
+ flagged, cited to ACI 318
Inadequate Edge Distance and Clearance for Tie-Down Bearing Plate
Open the case fileMULTI-DISCIPLINE · SHEET SET
− issue on the drawings
+ flagged, cited to ACI 318
Embed Plates Sized Identical to Concrete Elements Resulting in Zero Cover
Open the case fileWe check each site set against code and your prototype before permit, so stores open on schedule and the same field fix doesn't repeat across locations.
For retail & restaurants“We're running at a pace of 200 stores a year. We're gonna get up to 300 stores in the next couple of years.”
Site, civil and house plans checked against local code and agency standards before first submittal, so fewer review rounds stand between you and permits.
For homebuilders“We do 15 projects per week. InspectMind catches coordination issues on every single one that our teams would have missed under time pressure.”
A second check on every set, across disciplines, so fewer comments come back from the city and fewer RFIs show up in construction.
For architects & engineers“We got fewer pages of city comments because the AI had already caught a lot of things that would have come back.”
[ Your standards ]
Upload your prototypes, design criteria and checklists once. Every check reviews against how your company builds.
company-library/
├─ prototype-2026-rev-c.pdf
├─ design-criteria-mep.pdf
├─ qa-checklist-permit-set.xlsx
└─ local-amendments-tx.pdf applied to every check
Prototypes, design standards, QA checklists and local amendments, checked on every set.
Catch it on the prototype and every site set after it gets checked for the same miss.
[ Your stack ]
01
Send findings into the ACC projects your team already uses.
02
Export findings as markups your team already reviews.
03
Send sets from your own systems and get findings back.
04
Run checks from AI assistants that support MCP.
We use leading models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google too. The difference is everything we built around them for construction review.
Full comparisonGeneral AI chat
InspectMind
Built to pass the security reviews that large owners, builders and engineering firms run before they sign.
In progress with Vanta. We'll publish the report in our trust center when it's issued.
SAML SSO for your email domain, including Microsoft Entra ID.
TLS in transit, encrypted private storage and databases at rest.
Your drawings aren't used to train public or third-party AI models.
Documents stored and processed on AWS in the United States.
Security questionnaires, NDAs and a vendor security packet on request.
Julio · Pesco Engineering
“We used to spend 40+ hours on plan review. Now I upload the drawings, and get back a complete issue report that catches code violations I would have missed. It's a no-brainer.”
Martin Lehr · Charlan Brock Architects
“After my first call with Aakash Prasad, I knew they were head and shoulders above their peers in the marketplace. We put our first project through (750+ drawings, multifamily), and the tool flagged most of the major issues we knew about, plus 97 others that escaped our review. Working with someone who treats us like a partner instead of just a client.”
Mark Fly · Structure Summaries
“This isn't ChatGPT for construction; it's purpose-built plan review. We found dimension conflicts on load-bearing walls that every human reviewer missed.”
Simon G. Solorio · Solorio, Inc.
“InspectMind catches a lot of coordination items and the analysis is very thorough and helpful. I will definitely continue to use it during the different phases of the design. It will keep us updated with code issues and help eliminate change orders and RFIs during construction.”
Amar · Prostruct Engineering
“We run every project through InspectMind now. It catches 150+ issues on average (dimensional conflicts, code violations, spec mismatches), and those are things that would cost us 10x more to fix in construction.”
Greg Lason · Higher Ground Engineering
“This thing is awesome. Very funny how much stuff it caught that didn't get redlined by the reviewer. In looking at all the things it caught, it is a no brainer for all the jobs anyone does. I will be using this on every drawing set moving forward before I send out.”
Upload drawings and specs. Cited findings come back in hours. The first 10 drawing pages are free.
