Trusted by 2,000+ customer accounts to check drawings, specs, and codes before anything gets built.
On a typical commercial project, InspectMind flags 259+ issues across all disciplines. Every finding cites the sheet, the drawing snippet, and the code or spec section, so your team can verify it in seconds.
Every finding shows the exact drawing snippet and code reference. You verify in seconds. This isn’t ChatGPT guessing at codes; it’s purpose-built for construction plan review.
Learn how InspectMind supports construction drawing review and a consistent construction document QA/QC process.
Real document discrepancies, the reason they need attention, and a concrete next step for the design team.
Compare architectural assemblies, shutdown planning, and access-control sequences before procuring laboratory building systems.
Read the findingsCheck that structural load criteria and building elevations agree before framing and truss design proceed.
Read the findingsCompare school equipment schedules with controls specifications and the document index before coordinating MEP installation.
Read the findingsReconcile available fault current, equipment ratings, and motor voltages across electrical diagrams before equipment release.
Read the findingsCompare suppression sequences, detector placement, and grounding details against the project specifications.
Read the findingsCheck that architectural plans, sections, ventilation schedules, and wet-area details describe the same renovation scope.
Read the findingsReview the evidence, check the price, then try your own set. Eligible work emails receive a $100 first-check credit.
Measured on real drawing sets, not demos.
Published case studies range from 1 to 5,199 issues per project, from small remodels to large campuses.
Verified 2026-09-16. Pages are a recorded minimum; findings need professional review. Definitions and methodology
No training, no setup, no sales call. Most teams start with one project to see the results.
Drawings, specs, and reports, plus your internal QA checklists, standards, and local ordinances. We check against everything you upload.
Cross-references all disciplines against codes, specs, and your internal standards. Catches constructability issues too.
Prioritized by severity with page references and code citations. Evidence for every single finding.
One review engine, built for everyone who signs, builds, or approves a drawing set.
Submit cleaner permit sets. Catch code, coordination, and spec conflicts before the plan reviewer does.
ExploreProtect budget and schedule. Find the change orders hiding in the set before you bid or break ground.
ExploreRun a consistent first-pass review on every submittal and spend examiner time where it matters.
ExploreArchitectural, structural, civil, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection, reviewed together with specifications and submittals.
IBC, CBC, FBC, ADA, NFPA, Title 24, and your jurisdiction’s amendments.
Every spec section checked against what the sheets actually show.
Architectural, structural, civil, and MEP read together, not in silos.
A plan-reviewer’s first pass before you submit, fewer comment cycles.
Submittals and shop drawings checked against the contract documents.
Real results from real projects, in their own words.
“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”
“This is absolutely a no-brainer.”
“Nobody would catch that. No matter how many days you have, nobody is going to go into that level of detail.”
“That one thing alone pays for the whole thing many times over.”
“Having another check through AI on top of our normal process has already been helpful.”
“We were really happy with what popped out once our engineer reviewed it.”
Team happy with results
“It looks like an awesome product, like another pair of eyes checking everything.”
Another pair of eyes
“I could say yours is probably the first I've seen in the market that anybody can actually use.”
First tool anybody can actually use
“Your software looks pretty awesome.”
Software stands out
“It's exciting, and this is definitely what we were looking for.”
Exactly what they were looking for
“We used to spend 40+ hours on plan review. Now I upload the drawings, and get back a complete issue report that catches code violations I would have missed. It's a no-brainer.”
40+ hours saved per project
Review activity includes 1,400+ completed checks and 155,000+ potential findings retained. Savings below are modeled assumptions, not measured customer outcomes.
12 critical · 45 high · 28 medium (illustrative mix)
A confirmed issue that prevents downstream work can justify a review. Actual value depends on which findings require action and what the team corrects. This model does not predict or guarantee your savings.
Issue count: ~43 potential findings per 100 recorded pages in completed checks with page counts. Document types and review scopes vary.
Severity split: 14% critical / 53% high / 33% medium is the illustrative mix used in this model. It is not a measured accuracy or confirmed-defect rate.
Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. The assumed escape rates are 40% for critical, 20% for high, and 10% for medium. These are modeling assumptions, not observed outcomes.
Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K to $50K (scales with project value, rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), high $2K to $8K (RFI and delay), medium $1.5K (minor rework). These are scenario inputs, not customer-verified savings.
Purpose-built for construction, not ChatGPT or general AI. AI plan check vs ChatGPT
| Feature | InspectMind | Typical AI plan check |
|---|---|---|
| Understands drawings, not just textReads diagrams, details, and riser diagrams, not just text matching. | ||
| Multi-discipline and cross-disciplineArch, struct, MEP, civil, fire: catches spec vs drawing conflicts. | ||
| Code and constructabilityIBC, CBC, ADA, and local codes, plus unbuildable connections and undersized pipes. | ||
| Finds 100 to 500+ issues per projectOther tools find 8. We find 200+ on the same job. | ||
| Evidence for every findingDrawing snippet and code reference, so you verify in seconds instead of trusting blindly. | Partial | |
| Self-serve, no sales call6 minutes from signup to running a check. | ||
| No per-user feesPay per check and share with your entire team. | ||
| Scanned and hand-drawn PDFsWorks with any PDF: scanned, hand-drawn, or native digital. | ||
| Money-back guarantee5+ issues or full refund. |
Most teams validate by uploading a project where they already know the issues. See what we catch, then roll out across every job.
Priced per sheet and shown before you run. No subscription required: you see the exact price in the checker before you pay, and the first $100 is covered for eligible work emails.
Eligible work emails get up to $100 off their first check, one per company. No card required to start.
If we don’t find at least five meaningful issues, you don’t pay.
Rerun after each round of changes at the same per-sheet price.
Running 250+ sheets a month? Volume discounts and monthly plans are available, by email or chat with no sales call. Email [email protected]
Architects, engineers, contractors, developers, owner's reps, and plan checkers, from solo firms to Fortune 500.
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
See real results in our webinars, then try it on your own project.
A full recorded session walking through real findings on civil and structural sets.
Watch full webinarHow structural teams use AI plan checking for connections, loads, and coordination.
Watch full webinarPatterns in the issues that show up across real projects, by discipline.
Read the researchHere are the questions teams ask before they stop losing money to missed issues.
One issue caught pays for the service. 5+ issues or full refund.
Want to see it in action? Watch the full ASCE webinar or the NCSEA webinar, no call needed.
Aakash has dedicated his work and ownership in InspectMind to God. His faith calls him to love God, serve our neighbors, and build with integrity.
That means working to make excellent construction and engineering tools affordable and accessible, not reserved only for large enterprises.
Love God. Build with God. Build for God.
These are Aakash’s personal convictions and guide how he leads and hopes to build InspectMind.
