A single small discrepancy between the architectural and engineering drawings, or between the specifications and the details, can stop construction for weeks or trigger a multimillion-dollar change order. Catching these on paper before permit or before construction is one of the highest-ROI uses of AI plan checking.
When the architect's plan and the structural detail don't match, the contractor follows one and the other fails, or work stops until an RFI is answered. In real projects, a single such inconsistency has led to construction stuck for a month while the team resolved who was correct.
One small difference between the specification and the drawing (a material, a size, or a detail) can become a change order. On a large project, we've heard from customers: one such discrepancy led to a $3 million change order. The "small" detail on the drawing wasn't small when it hit the field and the budget.
Senior reviewers often focus on the big picture: overall structural design, major coordination, code intent. It's hard to catch every tiny mismatch across hundreds of sheets. Contractors and developers have told us that these small details, small on the page, are exactly what blow up in cost and schedule. AI plan checking is built to find them before they do.
Material calls, sizes, and callouts that don't match between the spec book and the drawings. Fix them in design instead of discovering them in the field.
Architectural and structural (or MEP) details that disagree. The AI compares related sheets and flags inconsistencies so you resolve them before submission or construction.
When you fix issues before permit or bid, you get fewer plan check comments, fewer RFIs in construction, and less rework and delay. Same-day or same-week results so you can iterate quickly.
Every issue includes page references and evidence. You can verify in seconds and route fixes to the right person. Export to spreadsheet or one-click RFI PDF for the design team.
Know the cost and the output before you upload.See pricingSee a sample report
