Upload drawings. Get prioritized issues with sheet references—in hours, not weeks. Use our construction plan check before the city does.
First $100 covered for eligible work-email signups · Money-back guarantee
Enterprise & volume pricing
Trusted by 2,000+ customer accounts including
Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance
See how we catch coordination conflicts, code issues, spec-drawing mismatches, constructability issues (e.g. fastener length), and checks against your internal QA checklists and guidelines.
See how an architect caught coordination issues before city submittal.
See how InspectMind AI tackles plan check issues at StartupHQ SF.
350 errors on a single project — see what AI review found.
Compare review workflows, then verify AI findings with your project team
Internal team or outsourced
AI-powered plan review
Review published findings to see what the reports contain. Issue counts and project outcomes vary.
Explore published project findingsUpload PDFs or connect SharePoint, Box, Procore, ACC.
AI cross-checks included drawings and references. Confirm which files and code checks are selected before you run.
See issues organized by severity with exact sheet references and cost impact.
Export to Excel, PDF, Procore, or ACC. Share with your team.
Treat each AI finding as a review item. Your team's judgment and the underlying documents determine what needs attention.
In your project, open the drawing, specification, or code reference attached to the finding. Confirm the sheet, revision, and code edition match the review you are assessing.
Compare the finding with the source in context. Check dimensions, notes, and referenced details. Read the review scope and any evidence limitations; missing information leaves a question to investigate.
Ask the responsible designer or engineer to assess the finding and appropriate action. Record your comments or flag an incorrect finding. A severity label alone does not establish that a defect exists or that a correction is complete.
Try the public example: our sample report includes a finding about missing secondary roof drainage. Read its explanation and suggested next step. On your own project, review the cited roof plans and drainage details with the designer before deciding whether the finding applies.
The public sample is anonymized; verify original sheets in your project's report.
Open the public sample reportA 180-unit multifamily mid-rise project reviewed in hours
"The Fair Housing findings alone were worth the review."— Development Manager
Read full case studyArchitects: See how one firm ran AI before city submittal and wrapped city feedback in days instead of weeks.
Comprehensive deliverables for every review
Excel-format issue list with discipline tags, severity classification, and sheet/code references. Easy to assign, track, and close out.
Summary of findings for your team to assess, with source references and recorded review coverage where available.
Issues organized by discipline conflicts—architectural vs structural, MEP clashes, civil coordination problems.
Add your company logo and customize report templates for client-facing deliverables. White-label options available for enterprise.
Same-day checks—thoroughness and accuracy first, then speed
Start with one real project. Eligible work-email signups get a $100 first-check credit and a prioritized issue report in hours.
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required
Sample report: 282 issues found|Pricing after first check
155,000+ customer-visible issues across 2,000+ customer accounts
