Back to Case Studies
RenovationAssemblyUnited States

Historic Clubhouse Renovation: 339 Issues Found

A comprehensive plan review of a historic clubhouse renovation uncovered 339 issues—including level datum conflicts, roof geometry contradictions, egress violations, and structural scope ambiguities—before permit.

339
Total Issues
15
Critical
2
High
0
Medium

The Project

A historic clubhouse renovation project. InspectMind performed a comprehensive plan review across architectural, structural, fire protection, and civil disciplines, identifying level datum conflicts, roof geometry contradictions, egress and occupant load errors, and structural demolition scope ambiguities before permit submission.

International Building CodeIBC 1015.3IBC 1026.1IBC 1607.1IBC 3304.1

Critical Findings (15)

CriticalTILLINGHAST/ENTRY Level Datum Shows 6' on A-301 vs 6" on A-302

Building Section 3 on sheet A-301 shows the TILLINGHAST/ENTRY level datum at 6 feet (6'), while Building Section 3 on sheet A-302 shows the same datum at 6 inches (6"). Both sections reference each other.

CriticalConflicting Grid Locations for Interior and Exterior Spaces

Sheet A-402 Detail 8 (Terrace Dining Room) shows interior dining at grid lines D–G. Sheet A-505 Detail 7 (Enlarged Plan) uses the same grid for the Patio. The same grid lines cannot define both interior and exterior spaces.

CriticalConflict Between Structural Connection and Expansion Joint Callout

A-508 Detail 2 references detail '6/A-605' (EJ-1 Roof to Wall) but graphically shows an HSS member bridging the connection. The expansion joint and rigid structural condition conflict.

CriticalContradictory Masonry Wall Demolition Scope

The roof demolition plan (SD-101) calls for shoring "PRIOR TO WALL DEMOLITION" and references Detail 1/SD-102. Detail 1 shows the lower portion demolished and upper portion "(E) MASONRY WALL TO REMAIN" but provides no underpinning for the remaining wall.

CriticalConflicting Roof Geometry at Tillinghast Room East Wall

A-404 Elevation 4 depicts the East wall of the Tillinghast Room as a gable end with a peaked roof. Wall section A-303 Section 6 shows the same wall as an eave with slope running the opposite direction.

CriticalConflicting Roof Structure: Existing Rafters vs New Open Web Truss

A-303 Detail 6 describes the roof structure as existing wood rafters to be sanded and restained. The referenced detail 1/A-507 shows new open web trusses. The same location cannot be both.

Sample High Priority Findings (2 in sample)

HighMissing Required Structural Design Loads and Geotechnical Criteria

The STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES on sheet SD-102 fail to indicate the design loads and geotechnical information required by the building code (Floor Live Loads, Roof Live Loads, Snow, Wind, Seismic, Soil Bearing).

HighMissing Roof Drainage System at Roof Low Point

Elevation 1 indicates a shed roof sloping to the South (low point). The South Elevation shows no gutters, downspouts, or scuppers at the low point.

Issue Categories

Architectural

Architectural and coordinate issues found during plan review

Structural

Structural issues found during plan review

Fire Protection

Fire and life safety issues found during plan review

Plumbing

Plumbing and accessibility restroom issues found during plan review

Civil

Civil and excavation retention issues found during plan review

Value Delivered

339 issues surfaced before permit
Level datum and grid conflicts caught across sheets
Egress and fire-rated assembly issues identified
Structural demolition and shoring scope clarified

"The number of conflicts between sheets—level datums, roof geometry, and exit types—would have caused major rework. Catching 339 issues before permit saved us time and kept the schedule intact."

— Project Team, Renovation Project

Want This Level of Detail on Your Next Project?

Get comprehensive AI plan review with prioritized issues and code references.

5+ issues or full refund
Results in hours
Demo optional

One issue found pays for the whole check