Distribution Yard Expansion: 75 Issues Flagged
Coordinate light-pole foundations, stormwater details, and utility relocation responsibilities before site construction.
Enterprise & volume pricing
Anonymized review · Published 2026-09-16
What this review documents
Coordinate light-pole foundations, stormwater details, and utility relocation responsibilities before site construction.
The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.
Key findings
Pole-foundation tie spacing differs
Structural / Civil
Two views of the same light-pole foundation specify tie spacing of 12 inches and 16 inches on center.
Next step: Have the structural designer issue one governing reinforcement requirement.
Outlet backfill detail needs scope clarification
Civil
A basin detail shows stone beside an outlet structure while the earthwork specification calls for cohesive, low-permeability material at the levee interface.
Next step: Confirm whether the shown stone occupies the regulated backfill zone and revise the detail if needed.
Utility relocation responsibilities differ
Civil
A plan note assigns all conflicting utility relocation to the contractor, while the specification directs utility companies to relocate public utilities.
Next step: Clarify scope, coordination, and cost responsibility before excavation.
Issue categories
Review details and suggested questions
Pole-foundation tie spacing differsStructural / CivilCritical
Summary: Two views of the same light-pole foundation specify tie spacing of 12 inches and 16 inches on center.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Have the structural designer issue one governing reinforcement requirement.
RFI draft: Have the structural designer issue one governing reinforcement requirement.
Outlet backfill detail needs scope clarificationCivilCritical
Summary: A basin detail shows stone beside an outlet structure while the earthwork specification calls for cohesive, low-permeability material at the levee interface.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Confirm whether the shown stone occupies the regulated backfill zone and revise the detail if needed.
RFI draft: Confirm whether the shown stone occupies the regulated backfill zone and revise the detail if needed.
Utility relocation responsibilities differCivilCritical
Summary: A plan note assigns all conflicting utility relocation to the contractor, while the specification directs utility companies to relocate public utilities.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Clarify scope, coordination, and cost responsibility before excavation.
RFI draft: Clarify scope, coordination, and cost responsibility before excavation.
Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies
Want this on your next set?
Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.
- Evidence-linked findings
- 5+ issues or full refund
- Results in hours
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required