InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

InspectMind vs ePlanSoft & CodeComply

Three tools that get grouped together but do different jobs

ePlanSoft runs plan review workflows for cities. CodeComply checks designs against building codes. InspectMind reviews a full drawing and spec set and reports what is wrong.

  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Standard from $50
  • Results in hours

The short answer

If you work at a building department and need to move submittals from intake to approval, ePlanSoft is the workflow tool. CodeComply automates code checks, for designers during design and for cities during review. InspectMind is for the people producing and building from the documents: upload a set and get back cited findings covering code, coordination and spec conflicts, before the city or the field finds them.

ePlanSoft

ePlanSoft describes itself as plan review software designed for local governments. Its products (including e-PlanREVIEW) cover intake routing, collaborative markup across disciplines on the same sheet, consolidated comment reports, resubmittal comparison and integrations with permitting systems. It describes AI for intake, review and response, such as sheet indexing to confirm a set is complete, while stating that AI does not replace reviewer expertise. Pricing is not published.

CodeComply

CodeComply sells AI building code compliance in three products: AI Compliance & Design for designers, AI Precheck for cities' pre-submittal intake, and AI Plan Review for city reviewers, which adds markup, revision comparison and plan chat. It covers ICC, NFPA, ADA and FHA codes plus local amendments, and is CivicPlus's plan review partner. Pricing is not published; the site offers demos.

InspectMind

InspectMind reviews the full set: drawings across disciplines, specifications and building code compliance. It flags dimension conflicts between views, MEP and structural coordination gaps, missing callouts and specs that contradict the drawings, each with the sheet and reference. It is self-serve with published pricing from $50 per check and a 5+ issues or full refund guarantee. Revised sets can be rechecked against earlier findings or city plan check comments. It does not offer city intake or permitting workflows.

Side by side

Feature
InspectMind
ePlanSoft
CodeComply
Primary buyer
Architects, engineers, contractors, owners
Local governments
Design firms and city plan reviewers
Primary function
Full-set review of drawings, specs and codes
Plan intake, markup, comments and resubmittals
AI code compliance checks and plan review
Automated code checking
Yes, IBC, ASHRAE, NEC, NFPA, ADA, IFC + uploaded standards
Not claimed on its site
Yes, ICC, NFPA, ADA, FHA + local amendments
Cross-sheet coordination
Yes, core check
Reviewer markup across disciplines
Not stated publicly
Spec vs drawing conflicts
Yes, core check
Not stated publicly
Not stated publicly
Revised sets
Recheck against prior findings or city comments
Compares resubmitted sheets
VersionVue change comparison
Pricing
Published, from $50 per check
Not published
Not published
How to start
Self-serve upload, no sales call
Book a demo
Book a demo
Guarantee
5+ issues or full refund
Not offered publicly
Not offered publicly
Primary buyer

InspectMind: Architects, engineers, contractors, owners

ePlanSoft: Local governments

CodeComply: Design firms and city plan reviewers

Primary function

InspectMind: Full-set review of drawings, specs and codes

ePlanSoft: Plan intake, markup, comments and resubmittals

CodeComply: AI code compliance checks and plan review

Automated code checking

InspectMind: Yes, IBC, ASHRAE, NEC, NFPA, ADA, IFC + uploaded standards

ePlanSoft: Not claimed on its site

CodeComply: Yes, ICC, NFPA, ADA, FHA + local amendments

Cross-sheet coordination

InspectMind: Yes, core check

ePlanSoft: Reviewer markup across disciplines

CodeComply: Not stated publicly

Spec vs drawing conflicts

InspectMind: Yes, core check

ePlanSoft: Not stated publicly

CodeComply: Not stated publicly

Revised sets

InspectMind: Recheck against prior findings or city comments

ePlanSoft: Compares resubmitted sheets

CodeComply: VersionVue change comparison

Pricing

InspectMind: Published, from $50 per check

ePlanSoft: Not published

CodeComply: Not published

How to start

InspectMind: Self-serve upload, no sales call

ePlanSoft: Book a demo

CodeComply: Book a demo

Guarantee

InspectMind: 5+ issues or full refund

ePlanSoft: Not offered publicly

CodeComply: Not offered publicly

ePlanSoft and CodeComply details reflect their public websites as of October 2026. Vendors change pricing and features; check their sites for the latest.

Which tool is right for you?

Choose ePlanSoft if you run a building department and need intake, markup, comment letters and resubmittal tracking in one system.

Consider CodeComply if code compliance is the main question, during design or during a city's review, and a demo-led purchase suits you.

Choose InspectMind if you need to know everything wrong with a set before you submit, bid or build, including coordination and plan check issues beyond code, and want to start today without a sales call.

Frequently asked questions

Is ePlanSoft an AI plan checker?

ePlanSoft sells electronic plan review software to local governments: plan intake, multi-discipline markup, comment letters, resubmittal comparison and permitting integrations. It describes AI features for intake, review and response, such as sheet indexing, but its site does not claim automated code-compliance checking. Plan reviewers still write the comments.

How is CodeComply different from InspectMind?

CodeComply focuses on building code compliance (ICC, NFPA, ADA, FHA and local amendments), with products for designers and for city plan reviewers. InspectMind reviews the whole document set: code compliance plus cross-sheet coordination, dimension conflicts and specs that contradict the drawings. InspectMind is self-serve from $50 per check; CodeComply does not publish pricing and offers demos.

Which one should a design firm or contractor use?

ePlanSoft is bought by jurisdictions, so applicants only see it through a city's submittal portal. Design firms choosing between CodeComply and InspectMind should decide whether they need code checks during design (CodeComply's design product) or a full-set review before permit, bid or construction (InspectMind).

Does InspectMind publish its pricing?

Yes. Standard is $3 per drawing page plus $0.35 per spec page, $50 minimum, with the exact quote shown before purchase. Every check has a 5+ issues or full refund guarantee. See the pricing page for current details.

More comparisons

All comparisons
First $100 covered

Check your next set before the city does

Self-serve from $50. Results in hours. 5+ issues or full refund.

  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours
  • No demo required

Sample report: 282 issues foundPricing after first check

187,000+ potential issues across 600+ companies

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

Sample report: 282 issues foundPricing after first check

187,000+ potential issues across 600+ companies