InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

AI ADA Accessibility Checker

Find slope violations, reach range problems, turning radius issues, and path of travel conflicts. Results in days, not weeks.

Start a free checkWatch 2-min demoQuestions? Chat or email

Free check, no card needed · Watch the 2-minute demo

Best for: Architects, Plan reviewers, Owners, Accessibility consultants.

Why ADA Violations Cost So Much

ADA accessibility requirements ensure buildings are accessible to people with disabilities. One violation can cause significant rework costs and legal liability.

ADA violations are especially problematic because they can result in lawsuits and require complete redesign of affected areas.

Common issues that lead to costly rework:

  • Slope violations (exceeding 1:12 maximum)
  • Reach range problems (forward and side reach requirements)
  • Turning radius violations (60-inch minimum)
  • Path of travel conflicts and barriers
  • Door clearance violations
  • Counter height violations
  • Missing accessible routes and features

What the AI ADA Checker Catches

AI reviews drawings for ADA compliance to identify issues that manual review might miss.

Slope Issues

  • Slope violations (exceeding 1:12 maximum)
  • Missing slope specifications
  • Slope inconsistencies between plans
  • Ramp slope violations
  • Missing slope details

Reach Range Errors

  • Forward reach range violations
  • Side reach range problems
  • Reach range conflicts with fixtures
  • Missing reach range specifications
  • Counter height violations

Turning Radius Problems

  • Turning radius violations (60-inch minimum)
  • Missing turning radius details
  • Turning radius conflicts with architectural features
  • Wheelchair turning space violations
  • Missing turning radius specifications

Path of Travel Issues

  • Path of travel conflicts and barriers
  • Missing accessible routes
  • Path of travel width violations
  • Accessible route conflicts
  • Missing path of travel details

Door and Opening Compliance

  • Door clearance violations
  • Missing door clearances
  • Door opening width violations
  • Door hardware accessibility issues
  • Missing door accessibility details

Code Compliance Issues

  • ADA Standards violations
  • IBC accessibility code conflicts
  • Local accessibility code violations
  • Missing code-required accessible features
  • Accessibility code requirement gaps

606

issue-title matches

1.5% of 40,401 structured public records

What the published dataset shows about ADA and accessibility

This disclosed pattern covers explicit ADA, accessibility, wheelchair, maneuvering-clearance, grab-bar, reach-range, and curb-ramp terms.

Counts use disclosed, case-insensitive matching on published issue titles. Topic groups overlap and describe this sample; they are not industry-wide error rates.

Review the full dataset and methodology

In-depth guide

Why accessibility errors survive drawing review

Most accessibility problems are not missing knowledge. Designers know the 60 in. turning circle and the 1:12 ramp. The errors come from coordination: a turning space drawn on the enlarged plan that a door swing or casework later eats into, a corridor that meets clear width on the floor plan but not after a drinking fountain is added, or a counter height that differs between the elevation and the millwork detail. Once built, these are demolition, not redlines.

The references below are to the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Many jurisdictions enforce ICC A117.1 through the building code instead, with similar but not identical dimensions. If yours does, upload that standard and it is included in the review.

Turning space (Section 304)

Section 304 allows either a 60 in. diameter circle or a T-shaped space within a 60 in. square. On drawings, the common failures are:

  • Turning circle drawn in a toilet room but overlapping the water closet clearance, a lavatory without knee clearance, or a trash receptacle
  • T-shaped turn used where an arm of the T is blocked by a wall or fixture
  • Kitchenette, break room, or dwelling unit plans that show no turning space at all
  • Enlarged plan and floor plan showing different room dimensions, so the turn only works on one of them

Clear width on accessible routes (Section 403.5)

Section 403.5.1 sets a 36 in. minimum clear width for walking surfaces on an accessible route, which may narrow to 32 in. for a length of 24 in. or less. Clear width is measured to the face of obstructions, not to the wall centerline. Things that typically reduce it:

  • Wall-mounted items, fire extinguisher cabinets, and handrails projecting into corridors
  • Columns, furniture, and casework placed after the corridor was dimensioned
  • Tight turns around an element, which need more width than a straight run
  • Long corridors under 60 in. wide with no passing space shown

Running slope over 1:20 makes a walking surface a ramp, and cross slope over 1:48 is not allowed. The checker compares slopes and spot elevations on site and civil sheets against those limits and the ramp requirements in Section 405.

Reach ranges (Section 308)

Unobstructed forward and side reach both fall between 15 in. minimum and 48 in. maximum above the floor. Obstructed reaches over counters or cabinets lower the high limit. Reach problems are easy to miss because the controls are often specified on different sheets from the elevations:

  • Light switches, thermostats, or card readers dimensioned above the reach limit on interior elevations
  • Dispensers and controls placed over a deep counter without adjusting for obstructed reach
  • Electrical mounting height notes that conflict with the architectural elevations

Doors, counters, and toilet rooms

  • Door clear opening under 32 in. once the door stop and hardware are counted
  • Maneuvering clearance at the latch side blocked by a wall, casework, or another door swing
  • Sales and service counter heights that differ between floor plan notes, elevations, and millwork details
  • Water closet centerline and clearance dimensions that conflict between the enlarged plan and the elevation
  • Grab bar lengths and locations missing or inconsistent with the fixture layout

Site and parking

The accessible route has to connect parking, passenger loading, and public sidewalks to the entrance. The checker looks for accessible parking with no access aisle shown, aisles on slopes steeper than allowed, and routes that cross curbs without a curb ramp. Site work is cross-checked with the civil checker.

What a finding looks like

Each finding names the sheets, the dimension, and the requirement. An illustrative example:

Enlarged plan A-401 shows a 60 in. turning circle in Toilet 114. Interior elevation A-501 adds a 14 in. deep vanity on the same wall with no knee clearance, which reduces the turning space. Revise the vanity or the room layout.

How InspectMind reviews accessibility

Upload architectural, site, and civil drawings as PDFs. The checker reads plans, enlarged plans, elevations, and details together, then compares dimensions and notes against the accessibility standard you enable. For broader code coverage, pair it with the building codes checker. See common patterns in ADA drawing errors.

Frequently asked questions

Does it replace an accessibility consultant?

No. It catches common issues early so your consultant and AHJ review spends time on judgment calls, not dimensions.

ADA Standards or ICC A117.1?

ADA Standards are built in. Upload ICC A117.1, a state accessibility code, or local amendments and they are included in the review.

Does it check site slopes?

Yes, where slopes or spot elevations are shown on the drawings.

See It In Action

Watch a demo to see how InspectMind AI catches issues before they become costly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the ADA Checker review?

What issues can it catch?

Do we still need an accessibility specialist?

Related Checkers

ADA drawings often coordinate with other disciplines. Check these related checkers:

Related Case Studies

See how other teams have used AI to catch issues before construction

What Construction Professionals Say

GCs, architects, engineers, contractors, and developers use InspectMind AI to catch issues before they hit the field.

“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”

A

Aaron Bass

Director of Construction, Cold Summit Development

“We used to spend 40+ hours on plan review. Now I upload the drawings, and get back a complete issue report that catches code violations I would have missed. It's a no-brainer.”

Julio

Owner, Pesco Engineering

Want to learn more about AI plan checking?

Read our complete guide to understand how AI reviews construction documents, what it catches, and how it fits your workflow.