Catch issues before they turn into RFIs

AI Shop Drawing Checker

Review shop drawings against design drawings and specs using AI. Catch coordination issues, missing details, and constructability risks before construction begins.

See Examples

Best for: Structural engineers, MEP engineers, Architects, GCs, Plan reviewers.

Why Shop Drawing Errors Cost So Much

Shop drawing review is manual, repetitive, and error-prone. Engineers review hundreds of drawings under tight timelines, cross-checking against design documents and specs.

Issues slip through. RFIs explode. Rework eats into margins.

Common issues that lead to costly rework:

  • Dimension mismatches between shop drawings and design intent
  • Material specification conflicts (specified vs submitted)
  • Coordination gaps between structural, architectural, and MEP
  • Missing or incomplete details that will trigger RFIs
  • Conflicting notes or callouts across drawings
  • Implied clashes and infeasible assemblies
  • Submittals that don't match project specifications

What the AI Shop Drawing Checker Catches

AI reviews shop drawings against original design drawings and project specifications to surface issues that are easy to miss but expensive to fix later.

Dimension & Location Verification
  • Dimensions vs design drawings
  • Locations and elevations vs contract documents
  • Critical clearances and tolerances
  • Opening sizes and positions
  • Connection point locations
Material & Specification Compliance
  • Specified materials vs submitted materials
  • Finish and coating specifications
  • Hardware and accessory compliance
  • Product substitution conflicts
  • Performance specification alignment
Cross-Discipline Coordination
  • Structural vs architectural coordination
  • MEP vs architectural/structural coordination
  • Trade-to-trade interface conflicts
  • System routing and clash detection
  • Access and clearance requirements
Detail & Completeness Review
  • Missing or incomplete details
  • Conflicting notes or callouts
  • Implied clashes and infeasible assemblies
  • Missing anchorage and attachment details
  • Installation sequence conflicts
Submittal vs Spec Compliance
  • Submittals vs project specifications
  • Code and standard compliance
  • Testing and certification requirements
  • Warranty and maintenance documentation
  • Required shop drawing content completeness
Constructability Assessment
  • Field installation feasibility
  • Sequencing and access conflicts
  • Tolerance stack-up issues
  • Site condition conflicts
  • Prefabrication coordination

Real Issues We've Caught

Actual issues found on real projects. Each one would have caused significant rework, change orders, or schedule delays.

Steel Connection MismatchCritical

What AI Found: Shop drawing showed bolted connection where design documents specified welded moment connection.

Impact: Would have required re-fabrication and schedule delay. Caught before steel fabrication began.

Curtain Wall Dimension ConflictHigh

What AI Found: Panel dimensions in shop drawings didn't account for structural deflection tolerances shown in structural drawings.

Impact: Prevented field fit issues and expensive panel modifications. Would have caused water infiltration.

MEP Coordination GapHigh

What AI Found: Ductwork shop drawings showed routing through area where structural shop drawings showed bracing members.

Impact: Caught clash before fabrication. Would have required costly field re-routing.

Specification Non-ComplianceCritical

What AI Found: Submitted door hardware didn't meet fire rating specified in project specifications for rated opening.

Impact: Prevented code violation and costly hardware replacement after installation.

See It In Action

Watch a demo to see how InspectMind AI catches issues before they become costly.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Checkers

Shop drawings often coordinate with other disciplines. Check these related checkers:

Related Case Studies

See how other teams have used AI to catch issues before construction

What Construction Professionals Say

GCs, architects, engineers, contractors, and developers use InspectMind AI to catch issues before they hit the field.

"InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project—conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review."

A

Aaron Bass

Director of Construction, Cold Summit Development

"We used to spend 40+ hours on plan review. Now I upload the drawings, and get back a complete issue report that catches code violations I would have missed. It's a no-brainer."

J

Julio

Owner, Pesco Engineering

Want to learn more about AI plan checking?

Read our complete guide to understand how AI reviews construction documents, what it catches, and how it fits your workflow.

Ready to catch issues before they cost you?

Protect margins, reduce risk, and improve quality. Pay and upload — results in 24 hours.

5+ issues or full refund
Results in hours
Demo optional

One issue found pays for the whole check