Question 1

What does InspectMind AI actually do?

Accepted Answer

Think of it as spellcheck for drawings. InspectMind AI reviews your architectural, structural, civil, and MEP drawings, specs, schedules, and codes, and automatically flags issues—dimension mismatches, spec vs drawing conflicts, cross-sheet coordination errors, and code violations—before they hit the field. Instead of manually hunting through thousands of pages, you get a prioritized issue list you can fix while changes are still cheap.

Question 2

Who is InspectMind AI built for?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI is designed for general contractors, trades, structural and MEP engineers, architects, owners, and developers who want to reduce rework, speed up submittals/permits, and deliver higher-quality plans. If you're responsible for drawings, specs, or QA/QC, InspectMind AI fits into your workflow with almost no change.

Question 3

What kinds of issues does InspectMind AI catch?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI focuses on real, meaningful issues, not cosmetic formatting. Examples include: dimension mismatches across plans/sections/details; spec vs drawing conflicts (e.g., TPO vs EPDM, wood vs HDPE blocking); schedule vs drawings mismatches (doors, windows, equipment, panels, fixtures); cross-discipline coordination gaps; code issues (IBC, ADA, fire/life safety); and sheet/document hygiene problems. Each issue is tagged Critical / High / Medium so you can focus on what moves the needle.

Question 4

How accurate is InspectMind AI, and how do we verify issues?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI is trained on thousands of real AEC issues and reliably flags the types of problems humans most commonly miss—especially subtle dimensional and spec conflicts buried across pages. Every issue includes a plain-English explanation and direct citations/snippets from the drawings, specs, and codes, so your team can quickly verify each finding and decide what to act on.

Question 5

Does InspectMind AI replace our QA/QC team?

Accepted Answer

No. InspectMind AI is a supplement, not a replacement. Think of it as an extra senior reviewer who never gets tired. It catches issues your team might miss under time pressure, but your engineers, PMs, and supers still make the final calls.

Question 6

When in the project timeline should we use InspectMind AI?

Accepted Answer

The earlier, the better. Customers use InspectMind AI during design development and CD sets, before bid so contractors can estimate with fewer surprises, pre-construction to start with coordinated drawings, and during construction to review addenda, ASIs, and revised sets. Fixing issues in design is typically 10x cheaper than fixing them in the field.

Question 7

What file types and sizes are supported?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI works with standard PDF project documents, including architectural, structural, civil, MEP, fire/life safety drawings, specs, addenda, contracts, schedules, and building codes. We routinely handle 1,000+ sheet sets and multi-GB PDFs. For extremely large projects (10,000+ pages), we'll work with you to ensure smooth processing.

Question 8

How long does an AI check take?

Accepted Answer

Same-day results. Most projects complete the same day; 200-500 sheet projects often in a few hours. You get an email when results are ready, and you can self-serve runs without talking to sales.

Question 9

Can InspectMind AI compare revised drawings and addenda?

Accepted Answer

Yes. InspectMind AI compares original vs revised sets and addenda/ASIs vs contract documents, highlights what changed, where new issues appear, and what needs a second look, so you can manage revisions and change orders with clarity.

Question 10

What building codes and geographies does InspectMind AI support?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI works globally—not just in the US. For US projects, we auto-detect the right IBC/state/local edition from cover sheets and project metadata and check against IBC, ADA, fire & life safety, and related structural load provisions. For international projects (UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Europe, Middle East, etc.), you can upload your local codes and standards as PDFs. We configure reviews against your specific code requirements—if it's a document, we can typically check against it.

Question 11

Does InspectMind work outside the United States?

Accepted Answer

Yes, absolutely. InspectMind AI is not US-specific—we work with teams globally. We currently support projects in Australia, New Zealand, UK, Canada, Europe, Middle East, and beyond. You tell us which local building codes and standards apply to your project, and we configure the review accordingly. The core document review capabilities (coordination checking, spec-to-drawing alignment, cross-discipline coordination) work on any construction documents regardless of geography.

Question 12

Can you check against my country's local building codes?

Accepted Answer

Yes. For international projects, you provide the applicable codes (as PDFs), and we configure the AI to check against those standards. We've worked with projects using: New Zealand Building Code (NZBC), Australian National Construction Code (NCC), UK Building Regulations, Canadian codes (NBC, provincial), Eurocode standards, and Middle East codes (Dubai, UAE, Saudi). If you have a specific code requirement, email or chat with us for enterprise pricing and we'll confirm support.

Question 13

Can we use our own QC checklists and firm standards?

Accepted Answer

Yes. You can upload firm QC checklists, standard details, owner/tenant standards, and local guidelines. InspectMind AI uses these alongside codes and specs so your internal standards are enforced on every job.

Question 14

How does InspectMind AI fit into our existing QA/QC process?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI is designed for zero workflow change: upload PDFs (or pull from connected storage), run an AI check, then review and assign the prioritized issue list. Teams typically run InspectMind AI before or in parallel with their manual review so humans start with a curated list instead of a blank page.

Question 15

Can InspectMind handle very large or complex projects?

Accepted Answer

Yes. InspectMind AI is built for large healthcare and industrial facilities, temperature-controlled warehouses, airports, campuses, and high-rises. We regularly run multi-discipline, multi-GB sets with thousands of sheets and can tune workflows for very large programs and portfolios.

Question 16

What integrations are available or planned?

Accepted Answer

Today: Upload from local drive and cloud storage (SharePoint, Box, Google Drive). Export results to Excel/PDF. Procore integration is live—issues can sync directly. Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) integration can be set up quickly for enterprise customers. Coming soon: Direct BIM model integration (IFC, Revit). If you have a specific integration need, we're happy to discuss.

Question 17

Do you integrate with Procore?

Accepted Answer

Yes. We have Procore integration that allows issues to sync directly with your Procore project. You can also export results to Excel and import them into Procore's issue tracking. The integration can be set up in about 2 days for enterprise customers.

Question 18

What about Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC)?

Accepted Answer

ACC integration can be set up for enterprise customers. In the meantime, you can export our findings to Excel or CSV and use ACC's issue import feature. The export format is designed to map easily to ACC's issue template.

Question 19

Can you check against our internal company standards?

Accepted Answer

Yes. If you have internal QC checklists, company standards, owner requirements, or project-specific specifications, upload them as PDFs and we'll check your drawings against those as well. This is especially useful for GCs with submittals, addendums, and contracts to cross-reference.

Question 20

Can you check against HOA or client-specific requirements?

Accepted Answer

Yes. The AI is essentially an inconsistency checker—it looks for conflicts between any documents you provide. Upload your HOA bylaws, covenants, or client requirements as PDFs, and we'll check the drawings against those documents just like we check against building codes.

Question 21

Is my project data secure and confidential?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Your data is hosted on AWS US-West infrastructure with strict access controls. We limit access to authorized staff only when needed (e.g., support, with your permission). We don't train public AI on your drawings; our LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) are contractually prohibited from using your content for training. We may use your documents to improve our document-processing models—you can opt out at support@inspectmind.ai. Enterprise customers can request detailed security documentation and custom data retention/deletion policies.

Question 22

Do you use my drawings to train AI models for others?

Accepted Answer

No. We don't train public AI on your data. LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) are contractually prohibited from using your content for training. We may use your documents to improve our document-processing models (e.g. to better read drawings); you can opt out at support@inspectmind.ai. We never share your documents with other customers.

Question 23

Where is my data stored, and can I delete it?

Accepted Answer

Your data is stored on secure Amazon Web Services (AWS) infrastructure in the US. You can access your project history and results anytime through your dashboard. If you request deletion, we can remove your data from our servers—though you'll lose access to the results. Data is retained indefinitely unless you request deletion.

Question 24

What about confidentiality for my clients' projects?

Accepted Answer

We take confidentiality seriously. Your project files are not shared with other customers and not accessible to anyone outside authorized InspectMind staff (and only with your permission for support purposes). We may use your documents to improve our document-processing models—you can opt out at support@inspectmind.ai. We can sign NDAs and provide security documentation for enterprise customers.

Question 25

Is the design check carried out per discipline?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Reviews are performed per discipline (Architectural, Structural, MEP, Civil, Fire/Life Safety, etc.). Each discipline is analyzed independently and also cross-checked against other disciplines to identify coordination issues—like architectural vs structural conflicts or MEP routing clashes.

Question 26

How is the review effort priced?

Accepted Answer

Eligible work-email signups get the first $100 covered for 7 days. After that, pricing is pay-per-check, driven by project type, disciplines included, drawing set size and complexity, applicable codes/standards, and review depth. For enterprise volume discounts, contact us through live chat or the enterprise page.

Question 27

Does AI only review, or does it generate design?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind does not generate design. It performs AI-powered design review and compliance checking, identifying: coordination issues, code non-compliance, missing or inconsistent information, constructability risks, and deviations from standards and best practices. Final design responsibility always remains with the consultant of record.

Question 28

What is the typical turnaround time?

Accepted Answer

Same-day checks. Most projects complete the same day, including large 500+ sheet sets. We prioritize thoroughness and accuracy first, then speed. Rush reviews are available for time-sensitive bids and permits.

Question 29

How accurate are the findings? What's your hit rate?

Accepted Answer

Every finding includes the exact drawing reference and evidence so you can verify it yourself; you don't have to trust the AI blindly. Architects and engineers often act on hundreds of issues per project, and feedback on any non-applicable items helps improve future checks.

Question 30

Is this all AI, or are there humans reviewing?

Accepted Answer

The actual checking is 100% AI—that's the only way to process thousands of pages of drawings, specs, and codes in detail. Sometimes our team spot-checks results for quality assurance and to continuously improve the AI, but the comprehensive review is performed by AI agents that never get tired or miss details under time pressure.

Question 31

How do you show me where the issue is?

Accepted Answer

Every issue includes: (1) the exact page number in your drawings, (2) the specific building code section that applies, (3) a plain-English explanation of the issue, and (4) a suggestion for how to address it. We take you directly to the evidence—you don't just have to trust the AI blindly.

Question 32

How are issues prioritized?

Accepted Answer

Issues are categorized by severity: Critical, High, Medium, and Low. Critical issues are potential safety concerns or code violations. High priority issues are coordination conflicts likely to cause significant rework. Medium issues are discrepancies that need attention. This helps you focus on what matters most first.

Question 33

Who validates the correctness of AI comments?

Accepted Answer

Our system uses AI models trained on real-world construction and design data, codified rule sets and standards, and QA checks by experienced reviewers for enterprise projects. For each issue, we show you the comment and the drawings/specs/codes where we found the issue—so you can validate it yourself, not just trust the AI.

Question 34

Does AI check implementation of previous comments?

Accepted Answer

Yes. When revised submissions are uploaded, InspectMind tracks previously raised comments, verifies whether they are resolved, partially addressed, or still open, and flags regressions or new conflicts introduced by revisions. This creates a complete audit trail across design iterations.

Question 35

Does AI check or validate calculations?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind does not replace stamped engineering calculations. However, it does check consistency between calculations and drawings (where provided), flag missing, contradictory, or unrealistic assumptions, and identify sizing, load-path, or detailing inconsistencies visible in the documents.

Question 36

Does AI generate a comment tracker sheet?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Deliverables include a structured comment tracker (Excel format), discipline-tagged comments, severity and category classification, and references to specific drawings, sheets, and codes. This makes it easy to assign, track, and close out issues across your team.

Question 37

Can the project be reviewed multiple times?

Accepted Answer

Absolutely. InspectMind is designed for iterative reviews across SD / DD / IFC stages, consultant revisions, and submittals/shop drawings. Each check is priced separately. High-volume teams get discounted per-check rates—contact us for volume pricing.

Question 38

Does AI generate a code compliance report?

Accepted Answer

Yes. We generate code compliance summaries highlighting applicable codes and standards, pass/fail/risk areas, and gaps requiring consultant clarification. This is especially useful for pre-submission reviews and consultant coordination.

Question 39

What value does AI add versus traditional reviews?

Accepted Answer

Key differentiators include: faster turnaround (days vs weeks), consistent and unbiased checking, cross-discipline coordination at scale, early risk detection before RFIs and change orders, and reduced rework, claims, and schedule impact. InspectMind is typically used alongside traditional reviews to improve speed, coverage, and consistency.

Question 40

How do I get started with InspectMind AI?

Accepted Answer

Upload a plan and try it—we work with everything from mid-size commercial builds to large industrial facilities. Eligible work-email signups get the first $100 covered for 7 days. Enterprise and portfolio options are available for high-volume teams; use live chat or the enterprise page for volume pricing.

Question 41

Is there a trial or pilot option?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Many teams start with one real project so they can see actual issues on their drawings and quantify ROI on live documents. Eligible work-email signups get the first $100 covered for 7 days. For enterprise volume pilots, use live chat or the enterprise page.

Question 42

What does a typical project cost?

Accepted Answer

Eligible work-email signups get the first $100 covered for 7 days. After that, pricing is based on project size and complexity: small residential projects are usually $50-$100, mid-size commercial projects are often $250, and larger commercial or multi-discipline projects are $500+. Teams crossing ~$2K/mo in check spend can contact us for volume pricing.

Question 43

How does pay-per-check pricing work?

Accepted Answer

Pay-per-check is our core model. Eligible work-email signups get the first $100 covered for 7 days; future checks are priced based on sheet count and project complexity. For teams consistently spending ~$2K+/mo on checks, we offer volume commitments with discounted per-check rates.

Question 44

What if I need to recheck a project after revisions?

Accepted Answer

You run a new check on the revised set—each check is priced separately. We're building progressive check tracking so you can see which issues were fixed between revisions. High-volume teams can contact us for volume commitments with lower per-check rates.

Question 45

Who built InspectMind AI, and what makes it different from generic AI tools?

Accepted Answer

InspectMind AI is built by ex-AEC founders and engineers who've lived rework, RFIs, and plan check pain, backed by investors like Y Combinator, AI Grant, PeakXV, and True Ventures. Unlike generic "dump docs into ChatGPT" tools, InspectMind AI is purpose-built for construction drawings and specs, trained on thousands of real AEC issues, tuned for cross-page and cross-discipline checks, and focused on direct, RFI-ready output.

Question 46

What does the Architectural Checker review?

Accepted Answer

Floor plans, elevations, sections, details, door/window schedules, finish schedules, and related specs.

Question 47

What issues can it catch?

Accepted Answer

Room and clear dimension mismatches; door/window size and location conflicts; finish and material inconsistencies between schedules and plans; ADA and egress issues tied to architectural layout; coordination problems with structural and MEP drawings.

Question 48

How does it coordinate with other disciplines?

Accepted Answer

It cross-checks architectural drawings against structural and MEP sets to catch things like missing openings, clearance problems, and clashes that would cause field rework.

Question 49

What does the Structural Checker review?

Accepted Answer

Foundation plans, framing plans, details, schedules (beams, columns, footings), and structural general notes.

Question 50

What issues can it catch?

Accepted Answer

Dimension and elevation conflicts; schedule vs plan mismatches (wrong member sizes, missing members); foundation depth and footing conflicts; coordination issues with architectural and MEP penetrations.

Question 51

Does it replace structural calculations?

Accepted Answer

No. It does not perform engineering calculations. It focuses on drawing/spec contradictions and coordination that drive RFIs and field rework.

Question 52

What MEP systems can InspectMind AI review?

Accepted Answer

Mechanical/HVAC, electrical, and plumbing drawings, schedules, risers, and details.

Question 53

What kinds of MEP issues can it catch?

Accepted Answer

Duct and piping coordination clashes; panel and circuit mismatches; equipment schedule vs plan conflicts; fixture and riser inconsistencies; clearance and access issues.

Question 54

How does it handle MEP coordination?

Accepted Answer

The MEP checkers cross-reference mechanical, electrical, and plumbing drawings with each other and with architectural/structural sets to identify conflicts and access problems before they reach the field.

Question 55

What does the Civil Checker review?

Accepted Answer

Site plans, grading and drainage plans, utility plans, and civil details.

Question 56

What issues can it catch?

Accepted Answer

Grading and elevation conflicts; utility and building location clashes; boundary, setback, and access issues; coordination problems between civil, architectural, and structural drawings.

Question 57

What does the ADA Checker review?

Accepted Answer

Accessible routes, entrances, door clearances, counters, restrooms, parking, and related details in architectural drawings.

Question 58

What issues can it catch?

Accepted Answer

Slope and ramp violations; insufficient clear floor spaces and turning radii; door and counter height/clearance non-compliance; missing or non-compliant accessible routes and features.

Question 59

Do we still need an accessibility specialist?

Accepted Answer

Yes. The AI catches common issues early, but final ADA compliance should be verified with a certified accessibility specialist and your AHJ.

Question 60

What issues can it catch?

Accepted Answer

Occupancy and egress non-compliance; fire rating and separation inconsistencies; sprinkler and fire alarm coverage gaps vs plans; structural code and load requirements that contradict stated codes.

Question 61

Does it remove the need for plan check?

Accepted Answer

No. It helps you get through plan check faster by catching common issues before submittal, reducing revisions and permit delays.

Question 62

How does the Constructability Checker help?

Accepted Answer

It looks across all disciplines to find: sequencing problems and inaccessible details; missing information that will turn into RFIs; coordination and clearance issues that make construction difficult or unsafe.

Question 63

How does the Plan Check Checker help with permits?

Accepted Answer

It focuses on issues that typically trigger plan check comments—missing details, code shortfalls, coordination gaps—so you can fix them before submission and avoid extra review cycles.

Question 64

What does the Survey Checker review?

Accepted Answer

Site, boundary, topo, and as-built surveys in PDF form.

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Features & Capabilities

What does InspectMind AI actually do?

Who is InspectMind AI built for?

What kinds of issues does InspectMind AI catch?

How accurate is InspectMind AI, and how do we verify issues?

Does InspectMind AI replace our QA/QC team?

When in the project timeline should we use InspectMind AI?

What file types and sizes are supported?

How long does an AI check take?

Can InspectMind AI compare revised drawings and addenda?

What building codes and geographies does InspectMind AI support?

Does InspectMind work outside the United States?

Can you check against my country's local building codes?

Can we use our own QC checklists and firm standards?

How does InspectMind AI fit into our existing QA/QC process?

Can InspectMind handle very large or complex projects?

What integrations are available or planned?

Do you integrate with Procore?

What about Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC)?

Can you check against our internal company standards?

Can you check against HOA or client-specific requirements?

Is the design check carried out per discipline?

How is the review effort priced?

Does AI only review, or does it generate design?

What is the typical turnaround time?

How accurate are the findings? What's your hit rate?

Is this all AI, or are there humans reviewing?

How do you show me where the issue is?

How are issues prioritized?

Who validates the correctness of AI comments?

Does AI check implementation of previous comments?

Does AI check or validate calculations?

Does AI generate a comment tracker sheet?

Can the project be reviewed multiple times?

Does AI generate a code compliance report?

What value does AI add versus traditional reviews?

How do I get started with InspectMind AI?

Is there a trial or pilot option?

What does a typical project cost?

How does pay-per-check pricing work?

What if I need to recheck a project after revisions?

What about false positives? How do you minimize them?

We've never used AI for plan review. How do we know it works?

We have projects outside the US. Can you support international codes?

We do 10-15 jobs per week. Is there volume pricing?

What enterprise features do you offer? SSO, white-labeling, data isolation?

Can InspectMind be used for forensic analysis or litigation support?

Can you review change orders and addenda for new issues?

We need results fast—is same-day turnaround possible?

What if you miss an issue?

We're an owner/developer. Should we use this, or should our GC?

We use BIM/Revit. Why do we need PDF checking?

Can we start with just one discipline or project type?

Do you work with CAD files or just PDFs?

Can I customize reports with my company branding?

Can multiple team members access the platform?

What support do I get during onboarding and after?

Does the AI learn and improve over time?

Can I access InspectMind on mobile devices?

What doesn't InspectMind AI do?

Do you work with affordable housing developers?

Can forensic engineers use InspectMind for investigation?

Is InspectMind suitable for residential builders?

How does InspectMind fit design-build projects?

How do I know the ROI? Will this actually save me enough time or money to justify the investment?

How often are codes and standards updated in the system?

What's the learning curve? How long until my team can use this effectively?

Can I control which issues are flagged or adjust the level of detail?

Is this just for new construction, or does it work for renovations, retrofits, and specialty projects?

Is InspectMind affordable for small firms and solo practitioners?

Is this really AI, or are there humans reviewing behind the scenes?

How does the AI improve? Can I give feedback on findings?

What kind of support do I get? Is there someone I can call?

How is InspectMind different from a construction chatbot or ChatGPT?

Can InspectMind be personalized or trained for our firm-specific standards?

How does InspectMind handle code book licensing and updates?

Can I control or filter the output and comments?

Can InspectMind detect graphical issues like missing brick ledges or dimension mismatches?

Is there a portal for ongoing access and collaboration?