InspectMind AI logo InspectMind
Aggregate Benchmark

Building Envelope in Architectural Drawings

7,409 potential findings across 626 completed plan reviews, shown only as anonymized aggregate data.

About 5 min read

Browse all benchmarks
First $100 covered

Run one real project first

Upload drawings, specs, and codes. Eligible work emails get a $100 credit and cited issues in hours.

  • $100 first-check credit
  • Work email required
  • Results in hours

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

See sample report

This benchmark isolates building envelope language in architectural review records. Roofs, walls, flashing, waterproofing, moisture, insulation, and cladding. Architectural, interiors, envelope, and finish-related records.

7,409

potential findings

626

completed projects

11.8

findings per represented project

Featured topic analysis

Largest building envelope cohort by finding volume

Architectural records account for 40.7% of findings across the eight published building envelopecohorts. This cohort contains 6.4× the median cohort volume, with 3,805 Critical or High-priority findings. These are descriptive counts, not an error-rate comparison.

Severity mix

Severity is the review priority assigned when the potential finding was generated. It is not proof that the project team accepted the finding unchanged.

SeverityFindingsShare
critical2243%
high3,58148.3%
medium3,32544.9%
low2793.8%

Compare this topic across disciplines

These counts provide context for the same title-term group in other normalized disciplines. They are not discipline error rates.

How to interpret this benchmark

InspectMind matched disclosed, case-insensitive title terms for this topic, then grouped records by normalized discipline. The source window runs from 2026-03-21 through 2026-09-04. Duplicate, dismissed, insufficient-reference, and previously suppressed findings are excluded.

Categories overlap, so one finding may appear in more than one topic or discipline cohort. Document size, project phase, review scope, and validation status vary. This is evidence about the mix of potential findings surfaced in completed reviews—not a defect rate, an industry prevalence estimate, or a quality ranking.

Privacy threshold

Only aggregate cohorts with at least 10 projects and 25 findings are published. No customer names, project names, addresses, files, account identities, project identifiers, or finding text are present.

Related research and review guidance

First $100 covered

Ready to run this check?

Upload PDF drawings and specs. Get flagged issues with evidence and code citations in hours.

  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours
  • No demo required

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

Sample report: 282 issues found|Pricing after first check

227,181+ customer-visible issues across 2,000+ customer accounts