This benchmark isolates dimension and geometry language in mechanical review records. Dimensions, clearances, elevations, alignments, slopes, and geometric conflicts. Mechanical, HVAC, refrigeration, and building-control records.
673
potential findings
247
completed projects
2.7
findings per represented project
Severity mix
Severity is the review priority assigned when the potential finding was generated. It is not proof that the project team accepted the finding unchanged.
| Severity | Findings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| critical | 18 | 2.7% |
| high | 325 | 48.3% |
| medium | 316 | 47% |
| low | 14 | 2.1% |
Compare this topic across disciplines
These counts provide context for the same title-term group in other normalized disciplines. They are not discipline error rates.
How to interpret this benchmark
InspectMind matched disclosed, case-insensitive title terms for this topic, then grouped records by normalized discipline. The source window runs from 2026-03-21 through 2026-09-04. Duplicate, dismissed, insufficient-reference, and previously suppressed findings are excluded.
Categories overlap, so one finding may appear in more than one topic or discipline cohort. Document size, project phase, review scope, and validation status vary. This is evidence about the mix of potential findings surfaced in completed reviews—not a defect rate, an industry prevalence estimate, or a quality ranking.
Privacy threshold
Only aggregate cohorts with at least 10 projects and 25 findings are published. No customer names, project names, addresses, files, account identities, project identifiers, or finding text are present.
Related research and review guidance
- Dimensions & Geometry topic summary and FAQs
- All 2026 drawing issue benchmarks
- 2026 Construction Drawing Error Index
- Guide: Dimensions & Geometry
- Mechanical: MEP Coordination
- Mechanical: Specifications, Schedules & References
- Mechanical: Building Envelope
- Mechanical: Code Compliance
- Mechanical: Materials & Products
- Mechanical: Structural Systems