AI finds hundreds of issues across a plan set. But resolving those issues requires coordination across disciplines—mechanical, electrical, structural, architectural. Here's how teams work together on AI-generated findings.
When AI reviews a complete plan set, it finds issues across all disciplines:
Column size doesn't match between S101 and S201
Duct routing conflicts with beam shown on structural
Panel schedule doesn't match one-line diagram
Door swing conflicts with accessible route
Fixture count doesn't meet occupancy load
Finished floor elevation conflicts with site grading
A single person reviewing all 200 issues isn't efficient—and they may not have the expertise to properly evaluate issues outside their discipline. Teams need a way to divide and conquer.
Invite your entire team to the organization. No per-seat fees—everyone who needs access can have it.
Project leads share projects with team members. Everyone sees the same issues and can contribute to resolution.
Add notes, questions, and clarifications to individual issues. Maintain a record of team discussions.
When an issue is addressed, mark it resolved. Track progress across the entire issue list.
Here's how a typical AE firm organizes review of AI findings:
PM gets the high-level view: 217 issues found across disciplines. Reviews severity distribution and identifies any critical items needing immediate attention.
PM filters issues by discipline. Mechanical issues go to the mechanical lead, structural to structural lead. Each discipline lead owns their issues.
Each lead reviews their assigned issues. They validate AI findings, add context, and determine resolution approach. Some issues may be false positives to dismiss.
Some issues involve multiple disciplines (MEP routing vs structural beams). These get flagged for coordination meetings. Comments capture the discussion.
Teams update drawings to address issues. As changes are made, issues are marked resolved in the system.
After updates, run another AI check to verify issues were resolved and no new issues were introduced by the changes.
Unlike many enterprise tools, InspectMind doesn't charge per user. Add your entire team—project managers, discipline leads, junior staff, QA coordinators—without worrying about per-seat costs.
Parallel review by multiple disciplines is faster than sequential review by one person.
Each issue is reviewed by someone with expertise in that discipline. Better accuracy.
PMs can see resolution progress across all disciplines. Know where bottlenecks are.
Junior staff learn by reviewing AI findings alongside senior engineers. Comments capture institutional knowledge.
See how your team can work together on AI-generated findings. No per-seat fees, full team access included.
