Value engineering proposals promise savings—but what are the coordination impacts? AI reviews VE proposals against existing documents to catch conflicts, code issues, and unintended consequences.
VE proposals are evaluated for cost savings—but who evaluates the coordination impacts?
A VE to the structural system may affect MEP routing, fire ratings, or architectural finishes.
Example: Reducing beam depth saves steel cost but conflicts with ceiling heights and duct routing.
Substitutions may not meet the same code requirements as the original design.
Example: Alternate fire-rated assembly doesn't meet the required rating in specific conditions.
VE proposals may conflict with existing specification requirements or performance criteria.
Example: Proposed HVAC equipment doesn't meet the efficiency requirements in the spec.
Changes ripple through the documents in ways that aren't immediately obvious.
Example: Changing a rooftop unit affects structural support, electrical, and controls.
Make sure VE savings are real—not offset by downstream coordination costs.
Catch unintended consequences before accepting VE proposals.
Understand the full impact of VE proposals, not just the initial savings.
AI reviews VE proposals in hours, not days. Make decisions faster.
Back to
Use Cases
Catch issues before they become change orders
QA during DD phase before CD production
De-risk bids with thorough document analysis
Reduce RFIs by catching document issues early
Cross-discipline coordination analysis
Document QA before GMP pricing
Upload the base documents and VE proposals. Get a list of coordination conflicts and potential issues before you accept.
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required
Sample report: 282 issues found|Pricing after first check
227,181+ customer-visible issues across 2,000+ customer accounts
