Multi-Story Residential: 430 Issues Found in Pre-Permit Review
AI plan checking uncovered 430 issues including critical structural conflicts, fire protection violations, code edition conflicts, and extensive mechanical coordination problems before permit submission.
First $100 covered. Enterprise and volume pricing
- Total issues
- 430
- Critical
- 15
- High
- 5
- Medium
- 0
The project
A 6-story multi-family residential building (R-2 occupancy) requiring comprehensive coordination across architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection, and civil disciplines. The project included dwelling units, common areas, mechanical closets, elevator shafts, and parking facilities with strict compliance requirements for life safety, fire protection, structural integrity, and building code standards.
- Project type
- Multi-story residential · R-2 occupancy · 6-story building
Codes referenced: 2021 International Building Code · 2021 International Fire Code · 2024 International Building Code · 2020 NFPA 70 (NEC) · NFPA 13 · NFPA 14 · NFPA 20
Critical findings (15)
- Critical
Water Heater WH3 fuel type conflict: Equipment note says ELECTRIC but specification states GAS-FIRED
Plumbing
On the same detail drawing (WH3 Piping Detail), Equipment Note 7 identifies the water heater as 'ELECTRIC WATER HEATER' while the narrative specification states 'WATER HEATERS (2) SHALL BE HIGH EFFICIENCY, GAS-FIRED, STORAGE TYPE.' The Water Heater Schedule on P901 confirms WH3 is ELECTRIC with 18 KW input at 208/3/60.
- Critical
Steel Lintel ML1 and ML2 Sizes Conflict Between S002 Schedule and S104 Notes
Structural
Sheet S002 Steel Lintel Schedule shows ML1 as W8x24 and ML2 as HSS16x8x1/2. However, Note 11 on sheet S104 defines ML1 as (2) 6x3 1/2x5/16 (LLV) and ML2 as W16x40 LINTEL. These are completely different steel member types - double angles versus wide flange for ML1, and hollow structural section versus wide flange for ML2.
- Critical
Wood Lintel Schedule (WL1, WL2) conflicts with Roof Framing Plan notes - lumber depth differs (2x8 vs 2x10)
Structural
The Wood Lintel Schedule on S002 specifies WL1 as (3) 2x8 and WL2 as (2) 2x8. However, Note 11 on the Roof Framing Plan S107 defines WL1 as (3) 2x10 and WL2 as (2) 2x10. The lumber depth differs by 2 inches (8" nominal vs 10" nominal), representing a significant difference in section modulus and load-carrying capacity.
- Critical
Conflicting International Building Code years: 2015 vs 2021
Code Compliance
Multiple versions of the International Building Code are referenced in this document. Found references to year(s) 2015 alongside 2021. The 2021 International Building Code (2021) was selected as the applicable code since it is the latest edition, but older version(s) are still referenced on some sheets.
- Critical
Smoke Barrier Assembly W605-SB Lacks Required 1-Hour Fire-Resistance Rating
Fire Protection · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The drawing shows wall assembly W605-SB explicitly labeled as "(SMOKE BARRIER)" but this assembly is based on the W405/W605 construction which is labeled "NON-RATED". The W605-SB shows only "5 1/2" WD FRMG" as its defining characteristic, with the base W405 assembly consisting of 5/8" GWB on both sides of 3 1/2" wood framing. IBC Section 709.3 requires smoke barriers to have a 1-hour fire-resistance rating.
- Critical
First Floor Interior Exit Stair Doors Have 45-Minute Fire Rating While Upper Floor Stair Doors Have Higher Ratings
Fire Protection · Code: 2021 International Fire Code
The door schedule shows inconsistent fire protection ratings for interior exit stairway doors across floors. First floor doors ST1-1 and ST2-1 have 45-minute fire rating. Second floor doors ST1-2 and ST2-2 have 3-hour fire rating. Third floor doors ST1-3 and ST2-3 have 90-minute fire rating. Per Section 1023.2, interior exit stairway enclosures connecting four stories or more shall have a fire-resistance rating of not less than 2 hours.
- Critical
Conflicting National Electrical Code (NFPA 70) years: 2017 vs 2020
Code Compliance
Multiple versions of the National Electrical Code (NFPA 70) are referenced in this document. Found references to year(s) 2017 alongside 2020. The 2020 NFPA 70: National Electrical Code (NEC) (2020) was selected as the applicable code since it is the latest edition, but older version(s) are still referenced on some sheets.
- Critical
Masonry Lap Splice Lengths Violate ASD Minimums
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The 'TENSION DEVELOPMENT AND LAP SPLICE LENGTH (FOR MASONRY ONLY)' schedule lists lap splice lengths that violate the minimum requirements for Allowable Stress Design (ASD). IBC Section 2107.2.1 explicitly states that for ASD, 'The length of the lapped splice shall be not less than 40 bar diameters.' For #3 bars (0.375" diameter), the minimum is 15 inches (40 * 0.375), but the schedule lists 12 inches.
- Critical
Unsecured Masonry Soaps at Steel Lintel
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The details show "CMU SOAP" installed directly against the web of a steel "WF LINTEL" without detailing any mechanical anchorage or lath system. Relying solely on mortar adhesion to smooth structural steel is not a code-compliant method for supporting masonry (veneer or otherwise).
- Critical
Missing Uplift Anchorage for Shear Wall Hold-Down Transfer Plate
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
Section 2 details a wood shear wall hold-down system connected to a "CONT. 3/8" BENT P" via a welded threaded stud. However, the detail fails to specify any vertical anchorage (such as embedded anchor bolts) connecting this bent plate to the supporting "8" CMU" bond beam to resist the concentrated uplift forces generated by the hold-down.
- Critical
Contradictory Elevator Shaft Construction and Erroneous Reinforcement Detail
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The drawing contains conflicting information regarding the structural construction of the elevator shaft. Note 15 explicitly mandates a "MASONRY SHAFT" that is "GROUTED SOLID & REINFORCED". However, the framing plan (Reference 2) depicts the elevator shaft walls with thin lines consistent with the surrounding wood framing and references wood framing tags (e.g., "WL1") and wood framing details.
- Critical
Incompatible Anchor Specification for Masonry Ledger
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The drawing details (Sections 6, 7, and 8) specify "3/4"φ EXP. ANCHORS @ 24" o/c STAGGERED" connecting a 2x wood ledger to an 8" CMU wall. The wall reinforcement note ("w/ REINF. PER PLAN NOTES") implies standard reinforced masonry, which is typically partially grouted (grout only at reinforced cells). 3/4-inch diameter expansion anchors generally require a solid substrate (solid grout or concrete) to function and are not listed for use in the hollow face shells of CMU.
- Critical
Contradictory Pile Spacing Dimensions
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The drawing contains a critical contradiction regarding pile spacing dimensions. General Note 4 states "CENTER TO CENTER PILE SPACING SHALL BE 4'-6"." However, the specific dimensions on Details PC5, PC7, PC8, and PC10 explicitly show pile spacings of 3'-3" and 3'-11", which directly contradict the general note.
- Critical
Incorrect Material Specification for Bent Plate Connection
Structural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The drawings specify a "14 GA. BENT PL" connected with "(2) 3/4"Ø EPOXY BOLTS" to anchor the wood framing to the CMU wall. 14 gauge steel (approx. 0.075" thick) is disproportionately thin for use with large 3/4" diameter structural anchors. The bearing area provided by 14 gauge steel is insufficient to develop the capacity of a 3/4" bolt.
- Critical
Missing Return Air Path for HVAC Unit in Mechanical Closet
Mechanical · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The mechanical plans (Details 1, 2, 3/M701) depict the VRP HVAC unit located inside an enclosed Mechanical Closet. Detail 4/M701 shows the ERV supplying fresh air directly into this closet ('SA DUCT DUMP IN MECHANICAL CLOSET'). However, there are no return air transfer grilles, undercut specifications, or return air ductwork shown connecting the habitable dwelling unit space to the Mechanical Closet.
Sample high priority findings (5 total)
- High
Unprotected Ventilation Penetrations in 2-Hour Rated Shaft
Fire Protection · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The detail shows a '4" DUCT METAL CONDUIT' and an intake opening penetrating the enclosure of a '2 HR. RATED SHAFT'. While the refrigerant piping note specifies a 'UL TESTED JOINT SYSTEM', there is no corresponding firestopping specification or damper shown for the 4" ventilation conduit penetrations.
- High
Incompatible Roofing Materials Specified (EPDM and Asphalt)
Architectural · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The drawing specifies 'EPDM FLASHING MEMBRANE' in direct contact with 'RUBBERIZED ASPHALT SEALANT'. Rubberized asphalt and other petroleum-based products are chemically incompatible with EPDM membranes, causing the membrane to swell, degrade, and fail, leading to leaks.
- High
Prohibited Mechanical Piping Penetration in Elevator Hoistway
Fire Protection · Code: 2021 International Building Code
The Roof Plan (Sheet M105) shows a "PIPING ROOF CURB" located directly within the enclosure labeled "ELEVATOR HOISTWAY". The leader line points to a penetration symbol inside the hoistway footprint. IBC Section 713.8.1 prohibits penetrations in shaft enclosures other than those necessary for the purpose of the shaft.
- High
Toilet Rooms Improperly Connected to Return Air System
Mechanical
In Plan 1, the Return Air system (green ductwork) serving 'CCU 06A' and 'MAINT. OFFICE 221' is incorrectly connected to grilles in 'TOILET 228' and 'TOILET 229'. The grilles in the toilets are labeled 'R2' (Return) and share the same ductwork as the office.
- High
Contradiction in System Type: Branch Boxes vs. Split Systems
Mechanical
The Drawing indicates a VRF (Variable Refrigerant Flow) system design by calling for "BRANCH BOXES ON UNISTRUT" in the refrigerant shaft area. Branch boxes (selector boxes) are specific components of Heat Recovery VRF systems. However, the Specification's Sequence of Operation explicitly describes "Ducted Split System[s]" and "Wall Mounted Split System[s]" each paired with an "Associated Heat Pump".
Issue categories
- Fire Protection
- Fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, standpipe systems, smoke barriers, fire-resistance ratings, and fire code compliance
- Structural
- Steel lintels, wood framing, masonry construction, seismic connections, load paths, foundation design, and structural code compliance
- Architectural
- Door schedules, stair enclosures, fire ratings, wall assemblies, roof ventilation, fireblocking, and building code compliance
- Mechanical
- HVAC systems, ventilation strategies, ERV systems, return air paths, equipment conflicts, and mechanical code compliance
- Plumbing
- Water heaters, fuel types, roof drains, piping systems, and plumbing code compliance
- Electrical
- Electrical code references, NEC compliance, and electrical system coordination
- Code Compliance
- IBC compliance, IFC compliance, code edition conflicts, and building code violations
- Document Coordination
- Drawing conflicts, schedule mismatches, specification contradictions, and document coordination issues
Value delivered
- 430 issues surfaced before permit submission
- 15 critical permit-blocking issues identified
- Code edition conflicts caught (2015 vs 2021 IBC, 2017 vs 2020 NEC)
- Critical structural conflicts identified (steel lintel mismatches, insufficient lap splices)
- Fire protection violations caught (non-rated smoke barriers, insufficient door ratings)
- Mechanical system conflicts resolved (VRF vs split system, missing return air paths)
“Finding 430 issues, including 86 critical permit blockers, before submission saved us from weeks of delays, permit rejections, and costly field corrections. The structural conflicts alone would have caused major construction problems, and the fire protection violations would have been instant permit rejections.”
This case study is based on actual project data. Project details have been anonymized to protect client confidentiality. All issues were identified by InspectMind AI before permit submission, allowing the design team to resolve conflicts and code violations proactively.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline.
- ResidentialHigh-Rise Residential Tower: 420 Issues Including Critical Document Coordination, Structural & Code Violations420 issues · Fire Protection, Structural
- ResidentialResidential Mixed-Use Building: 417 Issues Found417 issues · Architectural, Structural
- ResidentialResidential Rowhomes: 370 Issues Found370 issues · Architectural, Structural
- MultifamilyMultifamily Residential Development: 419 Issues Including Critical Fire, Egress & Code Violations419 issues · Fire Protection, Structural
- ResidentialCalifornia Residential Renovation: 92 Issues Including Critical Structural, Code Compliance & Coordination Violations92 issues · Structural, Architectural
- ResidentialNew Orleans Residential Renovation: 44 Issues Found44 issues · Architectural, Carpentry