Career Center Renovation: 82 Issues Flagged
Check material thickness, panelboard requirements, and feeder capacity against the equipment schedules.
Enterprise & volume pricing
Anonymized review · Published 2026-09-16
What this review documents
Check material thickness, panelboard requirements, and feeder capacity against the equipment schedules.
The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.
Key findings
Dryer duct thickness needs verification
Mechanical
A concealed dryer-duct note specifies smooth 30-gauge aluminum. The supporting table specifies a thicker minimum aluminum duct.
Next step: Reconcile the duct material and minimum thickness with the applicable specification.
Panel main type conflicts with specification
Electrical
Several branch panel schedules call for main-lug-only panels, while the specification requires circuit-breaker mains.
Next step: Confirm the intended panel configuration and reconcile the procurement documents.
Feeder breaker and downstream panel current differ
Electrical
An upstream schedule assigns a 20-ampere feeder to a panel whose scheduled total current is 171 amperes.
Next step: Verify the connected load, demand calculation, feeder size, and protective device.
Issue categories
Review details and suggested questions
Dryer duct thickness needs verificationMechanicalHigh
Summary: A concealed dryer-duct note specifies smooth 30-gauge aluminum. The supporting table specifies a thicker minimum aluminum duct.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Reconcile the duct material and minimum thickness with the applicable specification.
RFI draft: Reconcile the duct material and minimum thickness with the applicable specification.
Panel main type conflicts with specificationElectricalHigh
Summary: Several branch panel schedules call for main-lug-only panels, while the specification requires circuit-breaker mains.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Confirm the intended panel configuration and reconcile the procurement documents.
RFI draft: Confirm the intended panel configuration and reconcile the procurement documents.
Feeder breaker and downstream panel current differElectricalHigh
Summary: An upstream schedule assigns a 20-ampere feeder to a panel whose scheduled total current is 171 amperes.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Verify the connected load, demand calculation, feeder size, and protective device.
RFI draft: Verify the connected load, demand calculation, feeder size, and protective device.
Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies
Want this on your next set?
Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.
- Evidence-linked findings
- 5+ issues or full refund
- Results in hours
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required