InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

Elementary School: 172 Issues Flagged

Compare school equipment schedules with controls specifications and the document index before coordinating MEP installation.

Anonymized review · Published 2026-09-16

Free check on up to 10 drawing pages. Enterprise and volume pricing

Potential findings
172
Disciplines
4
Published examples
3
Critical or high examples shown
3

About this review

InspectMind ran an AI plan review on this education set and returned 172 potential findings across Mechanical, Fire Protection, Electrical, Plumbing. The selected examples below show the document conflict, why it matters, and a suggested next step.

Project type
Education
Disciplines
Mechanical, Fire Protection, Electrical, Plumbing
Potential findings
172
Published examples
3
Published
2026-09-16
Evidence status
Selected findings marked useful in the source review record

What this review documents

Compare school equipment schedules with controls specifications and the document index before coordinating MEP installation.

The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.

Key findings

  1. Smoke-detector scope differs

    Mechanical / Fire Protection / Electrical

    Critical

    Mechanical schedules call for return-air smoke detection on systems above 2,000 CFM, while the controls specification calls for both supply and return detection.

    Next step: Reconcile detector locations and the associated controls sequence.

  2. Drawing index lists unavailable pages

    General & Coordination

    High

    The review compared 133 indexed pages and flagged three as missing, one as mismatched, and seven with minor title differences.

    Next step: Confirm whether the missing pages were omitted from the upload or from the issued set.

  3. Water-heater energy source conflicts

    Plumbing / Mechanical

    High

    A plumbing plan routes gas to water-heating equipment, but the specification describes residential electric water heaters.

    Next step: Confirm the intended heater and coordinate its fuel, power, and utility connections.

Checkers used

Issue categories

Mechanical / Fire Protection / Electrical
Mechanical / Fire Protection / Electrical findings in the selected review excerpts.
General & Coordination
General & Coordination findings in the selected review excerpts.
Plumbing / Mechanical
Plumbing / Mechanical findings in the selected review excerpts.

Review details and suggested questions

Smoke-detector scope differs

Mechanical / Fire Protection / Electrical

Critical

Summary: Mechanical schedules call for return-air smoke detection on systems above 2,000 CFM, while the controls specification calls for both supply and return detection.

Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.

Suggested next step: Reconcile detector locations and the associated controls sequence.

RFI draft: Reconcile detector locations and the associated controls sequence.

Drawing index lists unavailable pages

General & Coordination

High

Summary: The review compared 133 indexed pages and flagged three as missing, one as mismatched, and seven with minor title differences.

Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.

Suggested next step: Confirm whether the missing pages were omitted from the upload or from the issued set.

RFI draft: Confirm whether the missing pages were omitted from the upload or from the issued set.

Water-heater energy source conflicts

Plumbing / Mechanical

High

Summary: A plumbing plan routes gas to water-heating equipment, but the specification describes residential electric water heaters.

Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.

Suggested next step: Confirm the intended heater and coordinate its fuel, power, and utility connections.

RFI draft: Confirm the intended heater and coordinate its fuel, power, and utility connections.

Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.

Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline.

Browse all case studies