Magnolia Ave ADU: 26 Issues, Seismic & Accessibility
Wood pad foundations in Seismic Design Category D, no accessible route to entrances, and incorrect HUD pre-emption claims, surfaced before permit submission.
First $100 covered. Enterprise and volume pricing
- Issues found
- 26
- Seismic category
- SDC D
- Critical issues
- 4
The project
A manufactured/prefab ADU project in California located in Seismic Design Category D. InspectMind reviewed the drawing set and identified critical deficiencies in seismic anchorage, fundamental accessibility violations, incorrect claims about HUD pre-emption of California codes, and extensive document coordination errors between floor plans, elevations, and site plans, issues that would have caused immediate permit rejection and potentially dangerous construction.
- Project type
- Manufactured home · California · SDC D
Codes referenced: 2022 CA Building Code · CBC 1604.4 · AISC 341 · CBC Chapter 11
Sample findings
- Critical
Wood pad foundations in SDC D
Foundation uses wood pads on ground with 1/4" self-tapping screws. SDC D requires positive mechanical anchorage per CBC 1604.4 and AISC 341, structure could slide off foundation in earthquake.
- Critical
Unstable three-point landing support
Free-standing landing supported by only three 4x4 posts with non-moment-resisting bases. A rectangular assembly on three points is geometrically unstable under lateral loads.
- Critical
Location map and site plan show different properties
Location map shows one urban block location. Site plan shows property at a completely different location with different neighboring parcels, two entirely different geographical sites.
- High
No accessible route to either entrance
Both entrances accessed via stairs only. CBC Section 1117A.3 requires ground-floor units to have accessible routes, steps are prohibited on accessible paths.
- High
Incorrect HUD pre-emption claim
Notes claim "ALL MH PRE-EMPT CALIFORNIA REQUIREMENTS." HUD pre-empts unit construction only: site installation, fire protection, and accessibility still follow CBC per Section 420.1.
- High
Sprinkler requirement contradiction
"ADU WILL NOT HAVE SPRINKLERS" contradicts CBC 903.2 and conflicts with scope noting "water tank for fire suppression system."
Issue categories
- Structural & seismic
- SDC D anchorage, unstable supports, missing member sizes
- Accessibility
- No accessible routes, 8" thresholds, stairs at all entries
- Document coordination
- Floor plan/elevation conflicts, location map errors, generic plans
- Code compliance
- HUD pre-emption errors, sprinkler contradictions, concrete strength
Value delivered
- 26 issues surfaced before permit submission
- Critical SDC D anchorage deficiency identified
- California accessibility violations flagged
- HUD vs CBC jurisdiction clarified
“The seismic anchorage issue alone could have resulted in a dangerous installation. Having an AI catch these fundamental issues before permit submission saved us from both liability and costly redesign.”
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline.
- ResidentialADU Project: Critical Classification & Coordination Conflicts14 issues · Architectural, Structural
- Tenant ImprovementMulti-Unit Development: 814 Issues Across 8 Disciplines814 issues · Fire Protection, Structural
- CommercialRetail Store Build-Out: 205 Issues Found in Commercial Construction205 issues · Fire Protection, Structural
- ResidentialHigh-Rise Residential Tower: 420 Issues Including Critical Document Coordination, Structural & Code Violations420 issues · Fire Protection, Structural
- ResidentialResidential Fireplace Renovation: 28 Issues Including Critical Fire Safety & Document Coordination Violations28 issues · Architectural, Mechanical
- ResidentialRural Residential Estate: 28 Issues Found28 issues · Architectural, Civil