Edsel Drive ADU: 14 Issues, Type & Structural Conflicts
Type VB permanent classification with trailer hitch detail, floor plans showing different building than elevations, and California Building Code violations, surfaced before permit submission.
First $100 covered. Enterprise and volume pricing
- Issues found
- 14
- Code referenced
- 2022 CBC
- Critical issues
- 3
The project
A prefabricated ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) project in California. InspectMind reviewed the combined drawing set and identified fundamental conflicts between the stated construction classification and actual structural details, major discrepancies between floor plans and elevations showing essentially different buildings, missing foundation information, and multiple California Building Code violations, issues that would have caused immediate permit rejection.
- Project type
- ADU · California · Prefab
Codes referenced: 2022 CA Building Code · CBC Section 602 · CBC Section 1804.4 · CBC Section 2304.12
Sample findings
- Critical
Type VB Classification with Trailer Hitch
Drawings specify "Construction Type VB" (permanent wood-frame), but the "HITCH VIEW" elevation shows a trailer hitch, fundamentally incompatible for permit classification.
- Critical
Floor Plan and Elevations Show Different Buildings
Floor plan shows 1 exterior door; elevations show 3 doors. "BACK VIEW" shows symmetrical facade that doesn't exist on floor plan. Window locations don't match.
- Critical
Missing Pier Locations Referenced But Not Shown
Foundation Plan Note 5 references symbol "N" for pier locations on floor plan, but A3 contains no such symbols, foundation cannot be constructed.
- High
Zero Roof Slope from Conflicting Dimensions
Eave height at 12' and ridge height at 12' means zero slope, contradicts the gable roof graphic and violates drainage requirements.
- High
Dimension String Missing 2'-10"
Interior dimensions sum to 24'-7" but overall length is 27'-5", nearly 3 feet of building unaccounted for in the layout.
- High
Wood Framing in Contact with Earth Fill
Porch detail shows 2x4 studs adjacent to pea gravel/sand with only poly sheeting: CBC requires concrete, masonry, or cement plaster separation.
Issue categories
- Construction Classification
- Type VB vs. mobile/manufactured conflicts, regulatory path issues
- Document Coordination
- Floor plan vs. elevation mismatches, missing referenced information
- Site & Grading
- Slope requirements, drainage distances, survey disclaimers
- Code Compliance
- Heating requirements, wood protection, mechanical ventilation
Value delivered
- 14 issues surfaced before permit submission
- Fundamental classification conflict identified
- Plan vs. elevation discrepancies caught
- CBC grading and wood protection violations flagged
“The floor plan and elevations literally showed different buildings. This would have been an instant rejection at plan check. Catching it early saved us from a complete redesign cycle.”
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline.
- ResidentialResidential Fireplace Renovation: 28 Issues Including Critical Fire Safety & Document Coordination Violations28 issues · Architectural, Mechanical
- ResidentialManufactured ADU: 26 Issues Including Seismic & Accessibility Violations26 issues · Structural, Architectural
- ResidentialResidential Guest House: 16 Issues Found16 issues · Structural, Architectural
- ResidentialSingle-Family Residence: 13 Issues Found14 issues · Architectural, Civil
- Tenant ImprovementMulti-Unit Development: 814 Issues Across 8 Disciplines814 issues · Fire Protection, Structural
- CommercialRetail Store Build-Out: 205 Issues Found in Commercial Construction205 issues · Fire Protection, Structural