InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

Commercial / Mixed-Use: 383 Issues Found

An anonymized commercial/mixed-use plan review in the Midwest uncovered coordination and code issues across civil, structural, plumbing, and electrical, before permit.

Free check on up to 10 drawing pages. Enterprise and volume pricing

Potential findings
383
Disciplines
4
Codes referenced
4
Critical or high examples shown
15

About this review

InspectMind ran an AI plan review on this project set and returned 383 potential findings across Civil, Structural, Plumbing, Electrical. The selected examples below show the document conflict, why it matters, and a suggested next step.

Disciplines
Civil, Structural, Plumbing, Electrical
Potential findings
383
Examples shown
15

Key findings

  1. Civil: Street section elevations vs ADA ramp slope limits

    Civil

    Critical

    Spot elevations table conflicts with PROWAG ramp cross-slope and running slope limits.

  2. Civil: Flood zone note vs FIRM Zone AE delineation

    Civil

    Critical

    General note states site not in SFHA (Zone X) while plan shows Zone AE floodway.

  3. Civil: Sanitary structure table vs design guidelines

    Civil

    Critical

    Sanitary sewer structure data table format does not match jurisdiction design guidelines.

  4. Civil: Benchmark datum NAVD 88 vs NAD 1983 spec

    Civil

    Critical

    Site TBMs and project BM reference NAVD 88; spec requires NAD 1983 datum.

  5. Civil: Water main vs storm sewer vertical separation

    Civil

    Critical

    10-ft horizontal / 18-in vertical separation from sanitary and storm sewers not maintained at crossing.

  6. Civil: Spillway elevation vs top of bank schedule

    Civil

    Critical

    Section graphic shows spillway elevation below top of bank; schedule values conflict.

  7. Civil/Structural: Manhole anchor bolt detail vs adjustment ring

    Structural

    Critical

    Anchor bolt callout (3/8" x 3" SS) vs drill 1/2" anchor holes detail conflict.

  8. Civil: Outside-source details vs Noblesville Standards

    Civil

    Critical

    Sanitary sewer details from outside source conflict with direction to use Noblesville Standards only.

  9. Civil: Storm sewer structure invert consistency

    Civil

    High

    Storm sewer structure inverts and pipe lengths conflict between plan and profile.

  10. Civil: Casing extension past stormwater structure

    Civil

    High

    Detail shows 6 ft casing extension; note requires at least 8 feet past stormwater manhole.

Issue categories

Civil
Grading, utilities, storm/sanitary sewer, ADA ramps, and civil design guidelines compliance
Structural
Structural connections, load paths, foundation design, and structural code compliance
Plumbing
Plumbing fixtures, drainage, venting, water supply, and plumbing code compliance
Electrical
Electrical systems, panelboards, circuits, and electrical code compliance

Review details and suggested questions

Civil: Street section elevations vs ADA ramp slope limits

Civil

Critical

Summary: Spot elevations table conflicts with PROWAG ramp cross-slope and running slope limits.

Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval for Commercial projects.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Civil grading and ADA ramp slope coordination.

Civil: Flood zone note vs FIRM Zone AE delineation

Civil

Critical

Summary: General note states site not in SFHA (Zone X) while plan shows Zone AE floodway.

Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and permit rejection.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Flood zone designation and note consistency.

Civil: Sanitary structure table vs design guidelines

Civil

Critical

Summary: Sanitary sewer structure data table format does not match jurisdiction design guidelines.

Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders in Commercial projects.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Sanitary structure table format per local standards.

Civil: Benchmark datum NAVD 88 vs NAD 1983 spec

Civil

Critical

Summary: Site TBMs and project BM reference NAVD 88; spec requires NAD 1983 datum.

Why it matters: Addressing this issue before construction prevents costly rework and ensures code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Datum and benchmark consistency.

Civil: Water main vs storm sewer vertical separation

Civil

Critical

Summary: 10-ft horizontal / 18-in vertical separation from sanitary and storm sewers not maintained at crossing.

Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval for Commercial projects.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Water main and storm sewer separation at conflict location.

Civil: Spillway elevation vs top of bank schedule

Civil

Critical

Summary: Section graphic shows spillway elevation below top of bank; schedule values conflict.

Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Spillway and top of bank elevations.

Civil/Structural: Manhole anchor bolt detail vs adjustment ring

Structural

Critical

Summary: Anchor bolt callout (3/8" x 3" SS) vs drill 1/2" anchor holes detail conflict.

Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Manhole anchor bolt size and hole detail.

Civil: Outside-source details vs Noblesville Standards

Civil

Critical

Summary: Sanitary sewer details from outside source conflict with direction to use Noblesville Standards only.

Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Use of jurisdiction standard details.

Civil: Storm sewer structure invert consistency

Civil

High

Summary: Storm sewer structure inverts and pipe lengths conflict between plan and profile.

Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders in Commercial projects.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Storm sewer invert and pipe run consistency.

Civil: Casing extension past stormwater structure

Civil

High

Summary: Detail shows 6 ft casing extension; note requires at least 8 feet past stormwater manhole.

Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Casing extension dimension at stormwater structure.

Civil: Street high point station vs spot elevation

Civil

High

Summary: High point station and elevation on street section conflict with spot elevation table.

Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Street profile and spot elevation consistency.

Civil: Sanitary structure INV consistency across sheets

Civil

High

Summary: Sanitary structure invert elevations conflict between plan callouts and profile.

Why it matters: Addressing this issue before construction prevents costly rework and ensures code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Sanitary structure invert elevations.

Civil/Plumbing: Water and sewer horizontal separation

Plumbing

Critical

Summary: Required 10-ft horizontal and 18-in vertical separation from sanitary/storm not maintained.

Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval for Commercial projects.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Water main and sewer separation at crossing.

Structural: Steel splice plate thickness callout

Structural

Critical

Summary: Detail calls out 1/32" thickness; design professional certification and constructability conflict.

Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Steel splice plate thickness and detail.

Civil: Curve table vs alignment geometry

Civil

High

Summary: Curve table dimension conflicts with alignment PC/PT and temp access road geometry.

Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Curve and alignment geometry consistency.

This is an anonymized example. Findings shown are excerpts for illustration. Actual project details have been modified to protect client confidentiality.

Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline.

Browse all case studies