Restaurant Expansion: 138 Issues Flagged
Coordinate fire-separation terminology, service pathways, and the readiness of structural details before construction.
Enterprise & volume pricing
Anonymized review · Published 2026-09-16
What this review documents
Coordinate fire-separation terminology, service pathways, and the readiness of structural details before construction.
The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.
Key findings
One-hour assembly is labeled as a fire wall
Architectural / Fire Protection
A detail labels an existing one-hour assembly as a fire wall. The review flagged whether that term matches the intended separation and applicable rating.
Next step: Ask the architect to confirm the assembly classification, rating, and governing requirements.
Beverage-line pathway sizes conflict
Architectural / Plumbing / Foodservice
Architectural drawings call for an eight-inch conduit, while plumbing drawings call for a twelve-inch sleeve for the beverage and glycol lines.
Next step: Agree on the pathway size and coordinate the opening and routing.
Stair foundation remains concept-only
Structural
A foundation plan shows stair support posts but also says the work is conceptual and must be redesigned.
Next step: Confirm whether the set is ready for construction and issue the required engineered details.
Issue categories
Review details and suggested questions
One-hour assembly is labeled as a fire wallArchitectural / Fire ProtectionCritical
Summary: A detail labels an existing one-hour assembly as a fire wall. The review flagged whether that term matches the intended separation and applicable rating.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Ask the architect to confirm the assembly classification, rating, and governing requirements.
RFI draft: Ask the architect to confirm the assembly classification, rating, and governing requirements.
Beverage-line pathway sizes conflictArchitectural / Plumbing / FoodserviceHigh
Summary: Architectural drawings call for an eight-inch conduit, while plumbing drawings call for a twelve-inch sleeve for the beverage and glycol lines.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Agree on the pathway size and coordinate the opening and routing.
RFI draft: Agree on the pathway size and coordinate the opening and routing.
Stair foundation remains concept-onlyStructuralHigh
Summary: A foundation plan shows stair support posts but also says the work is conceptual and must be redesigned.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Confirm whether the set is ready for construction and issue the required engineered details.
RFI draft: Confirm whether the set is ready for construction and issue the required engineered details.
Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies
Want this on your next set?
Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.
- Evidence-linked findings
- 5+ issues or full refund
- Results in hours
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required