Data centers have no room for error. Our AI catches power distribution conflicts, cooling coordination issues, and redundancy gaps before they impact your uptime commitments.
5+ issues or full refund • Results in hours
Used on 1,600+ projects by 600+ companies
Power density, cooling requirements, and redundancy protocols make data center projects uniquely complex.
Verify PDU specifications, busway coordination, and redundancy paths.
Catch CRAC/CRAH placement conflicts and hot/cold aisle issues.
Ensure N+1, 2N, and concurrent maintainability requirements are met.
Critical infrastructure MEP requires early clash detection.
Based on reviews of hyperscale, colocation, and enterprise data centers.
Electrical, mechanical, structural, and fire protection plans
Equipment specs, redundancy requirements, and Tier standards
Prioritized issues impacting uptime and redundancy
Fix issues before they impact your SLA commitments
Catch power, cooling, and redundancy issues before they impact uptime.
First $100 covered for eligible work emails · 5+ issues or full refund
“We found 156 issues on our hyperscale project: power distribution mismatches, cooling conflicts, and structural coordination problems. Any one of these could have impacted our uptime commitment.”
Review activity includes 1,700+ completed checks and 187,000+ potential findings retained. Savings below are modeled assumptions, not measured customer outcomes.
12 critical · 46 high · 29 medium (illustrative mix)
A confirmed issue that prevents downstream work can justify a review. Actual value depends on which findings require action and what the team corrects. This model does not predict or guarantee your savings.
Issue count: ~43 potential findings per 100 recorded pages in completed checks with page counts. Document types and review scopes vary.
Severity split: 14% critical / 53% high / 33% medium is the illustrative mix used in this model. It is not a measured accuracy or confirmed-defect rate.
Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. The assumed escape rates are 40% for critical, 20% for high, and 10% for medium. These are modeling assumptions, not observed outcomes.
Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K to $50K (scales with project value, rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), high $2K to $8K (RFI and delay), medium $1.5K (minor rework). These are scenario inputs, not customer-verified savings.
Guides, articles, and case studies.
Field Reports captures power, cooling, and equipment commissioning observations with photos and voice, drafted in your firm's template, ready for the owner.
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
