Multifamily projects have unit repetition, complex egress, and accessibility requirements. Our AI catches area calculation errors, unit mix discrepancies, and fire separation issues.
5+ issues or full refund • Results in hours
Used on 1,600+ projects by 600+ companies
Unit repetition amplifies errors. One mistake becomes 50, 100, or 200 mistakes across the building.
Verify unit types, counts, and square footages match schedules and marketing materials.
Catch ADA, FHA, and state accessibility violations before plan check.
Verify corridor ratings, unit demising walls, and floor/ceiling assemblies.
Confirm net/gross areas, efficiency ratios, and FAR compliance.
Based on 100+ apartment, condo, and townhome project reviews.
Floor plans, unit types, building sections, and site plans
Unit schedules, accessibility plans, and fire protection specs
Issues organized by unit type, floor, and building
Catch errors before they multiply across all units
Catch unit mix errors, accessibility violations, and fire separation issues before permitting.
First $100 covered for eligible work emails · 5+ issues or full refund
“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project, conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”
Review activity includes 1,700+ completed checks and 187,000+ potential findings retained. Savings below are modeled assumptions, not measured customer outcomes.
12 critical · 46 high · 29 medium (illustrative mix)
A confirmed issue that prevents downstream work can justify a review. Actual value depends on which findings require action and what the team corrects. This model does not predict or guarantee your savings.
Issue count: ~43 potential findings per 100 recorded pages in completed checks with page counts. Document types and review scopes vary.
Severity split: 14% critical / 53% high / 33% medium is the illustrative mix used in this model. It is not a measured accuracy or confirmed-defect rate.
Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. The assumed escape rates are 40% for critical, 20% for high, and 10% for medium. These are modeling assumptions, not observed outcomes.
Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K to $50K (scales with project value, rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), high $2K to $8K (RFI and delay), medium $1.5K (minor rework). These are scenario inputs, not customer-verified savings.
Guides, articles, and case studies.
Walk units, dictate findings, snap photos. Field Reports drafts daily logs and punch lists in your template, syncs to Procore and Smartsheet.
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
