InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

Accessibility in Architectural Drawings

1,281 potential findings across 347 completed plan reviews, shown only as anonymized aggregate data.
By InspectMind··About 5 min read
Browse all benchmarks

This benchmark isolates accessibility language in architectural review records. Accessible routes, ADA requirements, ramps, clearances, and maneuvering space. Architectural, interiors, envelope, and finish-related records.

1,281

potential findings

347

completed projects

3.7

findings per represented project

Featured topic analysis

Largest accessibility cohort by finding volume

Architectural records account for 47.6% of findings across the eight published accessibilitycohorts. This cohort contains 6.2× the median cohort volume, with 638 Critical or High-priority findings. These are descriptive counts, not an error-rate comparison.

Severity mix

Severity is the review priority assigned when the potential finding was generated. It is not proof that the project team accepted the finding unchanged.

SeverityFindingsShare
critical503.9%
high58845.9%
medium58445.6%
low594.6%

Compare this topic across disciplines

These counts provide context for the same title-term group in other normalized disciplines. They are not discipline error rates.

How to interpret this benchmark

InspectMind matched disclosed, case-insensitive title terms for this topic, then grouped records by normalized discipline. The source window runs from 2026-03-21 through 2026-09-16. Duplicate, dismissed, wrong-find, insufficient-reference, and previously suppressed findings are excluded.

Categories overlap, so one finding may appear in more than one topic or discipline cohort. Document size, project phase, review scope, and validation status vary. This is evidence about the mix of potential findings surfaced in completed reviews, not a defect rate, an industry prevalence estimate, or a quality ranking.

Privacy threshold

Only aggregate cohorts with at least 10 projects and 25 findings are published. No customer names, project names, addresses, files, account identities, project identifiers, or finding text are present.

Related research and review guidance