InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

Document Status in Architectural Drawings

1,071 potential findings across 335 completed plan reviews, shown only as anonymized aggregate data.
By InspectMind··About 5 min read
Browse all benchmarks

This benchmark isolates document status language in architectural review records. Revisions, stamps, seals, signatures, dates, permit status, and addenda. Architectural, interiors, envelope, and finish-related records.

1,071

potential findings

335

completed projects

3.2

findings per represented project

Featured topic analysis

Largest document status cohort by finding volume

Architectural records account for 27.7% of findings across the eight published document statuscohorts. This cohort contains 2.1× the median cohort volume, with 498 Critical or High-priority findings. These are descriptive counts, not an error-rate comparison.

Severity mix

Severity is the review priority assigned when the potential finding was generated. It is not proof that the project team accepted the finding unchanged.

SeverityFindingsShare
critical363.4%
high46243.1%
medium52348.8%
low504.7%

Compare this topic across disciplines

These counts provide context for the same title-term group in other normalized disciplines. They are not discipline error rates.

How to interpret this benchmark

InspectMind matched disclosed, case-insensitive title terms for this topic, then grouped records by normalized discipline. The source window runs from 2026-03-21 through 2026-09-16. Duplicate, dismissed, wrong-find, insufficient-reference, and previously suppressed findings are excluded.

Categories overlap, so one finding may appear in more than one topic or discipline cohort. Document size, project phase, review scope, and validation status vary. This is evidence about the mix of potential findings surfaced in completed reviews, not a defect rate, an industry prevalence estimate, or a quality ranking.

Privacy threshold

Only aggregate cohorts with at least 10 projects and 25 findings are published. No customer names, project names, addresses, files, account identities, project identifiers, or finding text are present.

Related research and review guidance