InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

Occupancy & Egress in Electrical Drawings

523 potential findings across 213 completed plan reviews, shown only as anonymized aggregate data.
By InspectMind··About 5 min read
Browse all benchmarks

This benchmark isolates occupancy and egress language in electrical review records. Occupant loads, exits, travel distances, corridors, stairs, and means of egress. Electrical, lighting, controls, communications, security, and low-voltage records.

523

potential findings

213

completed projects

2.5

findings per represented project

Severity mix

Severity is the review priority assigned when the potential finding was generated. It is not proof that the project team accepted the finding unchanged.

SeverityFindingsShare
critical275.2%
high20539.2%
medium27051.6%
low214%

Compare this topic across disciplines

These counts provide context for the same title-term group in other normalized disciplines. They are not discipline error rates.

How to interpret this benchmark

InspectMind matched disclosed, case-insensitive title terms for this topic, then grouped records by normalized discipline. The source window runs from 2026-03-21 through 2026-09-16. Duplicate, dismissed, wrong-find, insufficient-reference, and previously suppressed findings are excluded.

Categories overlap, so one finding may appear in more than one topic or discipline cohort. Document size, project phase, review scope, and validation status vary. This is evidence about the mix of potential findings surfaced in completed reviews, not a defect rate, an industry prevalence estimate, or a quality ranking.

Privacy threshold

Only aggregate cohorts with at least 10 projects and 25 findings are published. No customer names, project names, addresses, files, account identities, project identifiers, or finding text are present.

Related research and review guidance