MEP rework happens after installation. InspectMind reviews your full document set for duct clashes, panel schedule mismatches, and cross-discipline conflicts before they reach the field. Results in hours, with a free check on up to 10 drawing pages, then from $25 per upload.
Trusted by MEP engineers and contractors
A duct that conflicts with a beam, a panel schedule that does not match the plan callouts, a riser diagram that conflicts with fixture counts, these are all findable in the drawings. They only become expensive when they reach the field. Installation is underway, trades are scheduled, and a single coordination conflict can cascade into days of rework, change orders, and schedule damage.
Mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and structural drawings come from different teams, drawn at different times, under different deadlines. Checking for conflicts across that full set is time-consuming. Under schedule pressure, that check does not get done completely. MEP coordination review runs systematically across all disciplines in hours, flagging the conflicts a manual pass is likely to miss.
NEC, IMC, IPC, and NFPA requirements shift depending on which edition your jurisdiction has adopted and what local amendments are in force. Missing an adopted amendment is not an acceptable explanation at plan check. The review needs to run against the specific code edition and jurisdiction you are submitting to, not a generic national baseline.
InspectMind reviews all MEP disciplines at once, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection, alongside structural and architectural drawings for full cross-discipline coordination. Upload the complete set, include all disciplines, and get a prioritized conflict report with sheet references in hours. Every finding identifies the specific sheet, detail, and applicable code section. Where a manual pass requires an engineer to know what to look for and have time to look for it, InspectMind runs a defined check against every sheet in the set, every time. That consistency matters most on large document sets where the sheer number of cross-references makes manual coordination impractical under deadline pressure.
The Mechanical Checker reviews your mechanical drawings for duct-to-beam conflicts, equipment clearance violations, diffuser location errors, and VAV box access issues. Each finding is tied to the specific sheet and detail where the conflict appears, so your team can locate and resolve it without hunting across the set.
The Electrical Checker cross-references panel schedules against plan callouts, checks circuit assignments for conflicts, reviews conduit routing, and checks lighting layouts against reflected ceiling plans. Panel schedule mismatches are among the most common sources of field RFIs on electrical scopes. Finding them in the drawings costs a fraction of resolving them after rough-in.
The Plumbing Checker reviews riser diagrams for errors, checks fixture schedules against plan callouts, flags pipe routing conflicts, and verifies drain slope requirements. Riser diagram errors and fixture schedule mismatches generate more field RFIs on complex projects than almost any other plumbing coordination failure. Both are findable in the drawings before a single pipe is installed.
The Fire and Life Safety Checker checks egress conflicts, suppression system coordination, and NFPA compliance against the specific code edition adopted in your jurisdiction. Fire protection conflicts with structural or ceiling systems are a recurring source of late-stage coordination failures. Catching them in the document set avoids the schedule impact of resolving them in the field.
MEP rework is expensive because it happens after the work is in place. Run your full document set through InspectMind before your next submission and find the conflicts while they are still in the drawings.
Upload your mep & electrical teams drawings. Free check on up to 10 drawing pages, no card needed. Results in hours.
“InspectMind catches a lot of coordination items and the analysis is very thorough and helpful. I will definitely continue to use it during the different phases of the design. It will keep us updated with code issues and help eliminate change orders and RFIs during construction.”
These reviews were run on real project documents by firms that needed to know what was in their sets before coordination conflicts reached the field.
Julio, Owner of Pesco Engineering, describes the coordination and code compliance problem directly: "Being able to check for the codes and for checking between pages, anything that is out of sync or something, that's hard for me to do, especially comparing that. I like that you're specifying, which is what is code. If it's critical, if it's high, medium." Cross-page checking at that level, across a full document set, is what manual review under deadline pressure consistently fails to deliver. InspectMind handles it in hours.
Read the case studyA complex healthcare facility review produced 159 issues across a multi-discipline document set with extensive MEP scope. Healthcare projects carry tight clearance requirements, demanding code compliance across multiple adopted standards, and dense coordination between mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and structural systems. Finding 159 issues before submission meant the design team resolved them on their own schedule.
Read the case studyA K-12 school project review returned 375 issues across the full document set, including MEP coordination conflicts across a large multi-discipline drawing package. School projects involve extensive MEP scope across multiple building systems, with coordination requirements that span mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection. A finding count of 375 on a set that size reflects the density of cross-discipline conflicts that manual review under deadline pressure leaves unresolved.
Read the case studyEach review runs on the same engine and returns findings cited to the sheet and code section.
Mechanical Review: Duct Clashes, Equipment Clearance, and Diffuser Conflicts
Electrical Review: Panel Schedules, Circuit Conflicts, and Lighting Coordination
Fire and Life Safety: Suppression Coordination and NFPA Compliance
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
Straight answers before your first check.
