Plan Review: 5199 Issues Found

Summary: 3 index entries | 0 perfect matches | 3 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (3): TC01: Expected: TITLE SHEET AND DETAILS (TC01) | Actual: TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR: 2805 ADAMS AVENUE (TC01)(p20) TC02: Expected: PHASE 1 - INSTALLATION & REMOVAL OF BASE PLAN ADAMS AVENUE & IDAHO AVENUE (TC02) | Actual: TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR: 2805 ADAMS (TC02)(p21) TC03: Expected: TRAFFIC C...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 3 mismatched out of 3 sheets

Summary: 3 index entries | 0 perfect matches | 2 mismatched | 1 missing Mismatched (2): C1.0: Expected: PRECISE GRADING PLAN (C1.0) | Actual: PRECISE GRADING PLAN (C-1.0)(p1) C2.0: Expected: WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN (C2.0) | Actual: WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN (C-2.0)(p2) Missing (1) — listed in drawing index but not found in the document: Civil: - C3.0 POST CONSTRUCTION ...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 2 mismatched out of 3 sheets

Summary: 73 index entries | 0 perfect matches | 53 mismatched | 20 missing Mismatched (53): M000: Expected: GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS (M000) | Actual: MECHANICAL GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS (M000)(p1) M001: Expected: SHEET INDEX & EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES (M001) | Actual: MECHANICAL SHEET INDEX & EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES (M001)(p2) M002: Expected: EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES ...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 20 missing, 53 mismatched out of 73 sheets

Summary: 109 index entries | 0 perfect matches | 105 mismatched | 4 missing Mismatched (105): E0.01: Expected: SYMBOLS ABBREVIA. AND SHEET INDEX (E0.01) | Actual: ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS ABBREVIA. AND SHEET INDEX (E0.01)(p1) E0.02: Expected: GENERAL NOTES (E0.02) | Actual: ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES (E0.02)(p2) E0.03: Expected: LOAD CALCULATIONS (E0.03) | Actual: ELECTRICAL LOAD CAL...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 4 missing, 105 mismatched out of 109 sheets

Summary: 13 index entries | 12 perfect matches | 1 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (1): FA300: Expected: BUILDING SECTION (FA300) | Actual: BUILDING SECTIONS (FA300)(p11)

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 1 mismatched out of 13 sheets

Summary: 561 index entries | 199 perfect matches | 35 mismatched | 327 missing Mismatched (35): A508: Expected: UNIT PLANS - TYPE I B1-S, B2-S (A508) | Actual: UNIT PLANS - TYPE B1-S, B2-S (A508)(p109) E0.02: Expected: GENERAL NOTES (E0.02) | Actual: GENERAL NOTES (G005.1)(p6) PM104: Expected: OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 (PM104) | Actual: OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 (A104)(...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 327 missing, 35 mismatched out of 561 sheets

Summary: 19 index entries | 18 perfect matches | 1 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (1): F01: Expected: TITLE SHEET/SITE PLAN (F01) | Actual: FIRE SPRINKLER COVER / SITE PLAN (F01)(p2)

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 1 mismatched out of 19 sheets

Summary: 11 index entries | 0 perfect matches | 10 mismatched | 1 missing Mismatched (10): TC01: Expected: TITLE SHEET AND DETAILS (TC01) | Actual: TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS (TC01)(p19) TC02: Expected: PHASE 1 - WATER-KILLS IDAHO AVENUE (TC02) | Actual: TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR: 2805 ADAMS BLOCK 14, LOTS 7-14 AMENDED MAP BY B.A. D'HEMEC (TC02)(p20) TC04: Expected: PHASE 3 - UNDERGROUN...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 10 mismatched out of 11 sheets

Summary: 76 index entries | 5 perfect matches | 69 mismatched | 2 missing Mismatched (69): S001: Expected: STRUCTURAL -GENERAL NOTES (S001) | Actual: GENERAL NOTES (S001)(p1) S002: Expected: STRUCTURAL -GENERAL NOTES (S002) | Actual: GENERAL NOTES (S002)(p2) S003: Expected: STRUCTURAL -GENERAL NOTES (S003) | Actual: GENERAL NOTES (S003)(p3) S004: Expected: STRUCTURAL -SPEC...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 2 missing, 69 mismatched out of 76 sheets

Summary: 14 index entries | 11 perfect matches | 3 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (3): SP-001: Expected: NOTES (SP-001) | Actual: COVER SHEET, NOTES & VICINITY MAP (SP-001)(p2) SP-301: Expected: POOL DETAILS (SP-301) | Actual: POOL & SPA DETAILS (SP-301)(p7) SP-503: Expected: PRODUCT SPECIFICATION CUT SHEETS (SP-503) | Actual: PRODUCT SPECIFICATION CUT SHEETS (SP-501)(p9)

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 3 mismatched out of 14 sheets

Summary: 61 index entries | 2 perfect matches | 58 mismatched | 1 missing Mismatched (58): P001: Expected: ABBREVIATIONS & LEGENDS (P001) | Actual: PLUMBING ABBREVIATIONS & LEGENDS (P001)(p1) P002: Expected: GENERAL NOTES (P002) | Actual: PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES (P002)(p2) P003: Expected: SIZING TABLES (P003) | Actual: PLUMBING SIZING TABLES (P003)(p3) P004: Expected: CALCU...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 58 mismatched out of 61 sheets

Summary: The Plumbing plan shows a '4" SSD' (sub-soil drain) and a '10" WIDE x 4" DEEP SUMP HOLE' located inside 'TRANSFORMER P101'. However, the Electrical Power plan shows this exact room footprint occupied by large transformers 'TA' and 'TB'.

Why it matters: The physical footprint required for transformers 'TA' and 'TB' conflicts directly with the location of the 10" x 4" sump hole and 4" SSD shown on the plumbing plan. Additionally, routing plumbing drainage and sumps inside a dedicated transformer room presents a severe hazard and standard electric...

Suggested next step: Please clarify if the 4" SSD and sump hole can be relocated outside of Transformer Room P101, or if the transformers need to be reconfigured to accommodate the plumbing layout without violating dedicated equipment space clearances.

RFI draft: Please clarify if the 4" SSD and sump hole can be relocated outside of Transformer Room P101, or if the transformers need to be reconfigured to accommodate the plumbing layout without violating dedicated equipment space clearances.

Summary: The Plumbing Overall Floor Plan (P104) depicts multiple water lines, including an '8" CW', a '2" CW', and a '3/4" CD DN.' routing directly across the 'MPOE/DAS 112' room footprint. However, the Electrical Enlarged Floor Plan (E403P) identifies this as a dedicated 'MPOE/DAS 112' room housing electrical panels ('"HPA4" - 30', '"HPA4" - 32') and an 'ACCELEROGRAPH'.

Why it matters: Routing foreign systems (such as domestic cold water and condensate drainage) through a dedicated electrical and telecommunications room is a direct violation of National Electrical Code (NEC) 110.26(F)(1) and standard telecom guidelines, which require dedicated space to be clear of foreign pipin...

Suggested next step: Please confirm if the 8" CW, 2" CW, and 3/4" CD lines can be rerouted outside the footprint of the MPOE/DAS 112 room to comply with dedicated electrical space requirements. If they must remain, please clarify if a protective drip pan or ceiling system is intended and approved ...

RFI draft: Please confirm if the 8" CW, 2" CW, and 3/4" CD lines can be rerouted outside the footprint of the MPOE/DAS 112 room to comply with dedicated electrical space requirements. If they must remain, please clarify if a protective drip pan or ceiling sy...

Summary: In the plumbing plans for the B-series units (e.g., UNIT TYPE I B1-S), a bathtub (BT 1) is located along the wall of the upper bathroom. However, the corresponding electrical power plans show a 120V receptacle (circuit 19, typically mounted at +44" AFF) installed on that exact same wall, placing the receptacle directly inside or over the bathtub enclosure footprint.

Why it matters: Installing a receptacle over or inside a bathtub or shower stall is a severe safety hazard and a direct violation of NEC 406.9(C). This will result in a failed electrical inspection and requires the receptacle to be relocated outside the tub/shower zone.

Suggested next step: Please revise the electrical power plans for all B-series units to relocate the receptacle (circuit 19) in the upper bathrooms so that it is not within or directly over the bathtub, in compliance with NEC 406.9(C).

RFI draft: Please revise the electrical power plans for all B-series units to relocate the receptacle (circuit 19) in the upper bathrooms so that it is not within or directly over the bathtub, in compliance with NEC 406.9(C).

Summary: The civil grading plan (C02) and electrical floor plan (E104P) locate the new transformer vault in the right-of-way at the site's northwest corner. However, C02 shows this footprint directly overlapping an existing 12" storm drain and structure explicitly noted "TO REMAIN".

Why it matters: A below-grade vault cannot be constructed in a space actively occupied by a 12" storm drain system. The existing storm drain infrastructure must be relocated or the vault footprint shifted to resolve the geometric clash prior to excavation.

Suggested next step: Please clarify the location of the proposed transformer vault. Does the existing 12" storm drain and structure need to be relocated to accommodate the vault, or will the vault be shifted to avoid the existing utility? Provide updated coordinated civil and electrical drawings.

RFI draft: Please clarify the location of the proposed transformer vault. Does the existing 12" storm drain and structure need to be relocated to accommodate the vault, or will the vault be shifted to avoid the existing utility? Provide updated coordinated c...