InspectMind AI logo InspectMind
ArchitecturalDocument Coordination

Maryland Multifamily Interior: 26 Issues Found

An anonymized plan review of a Maryland multifamily interior renovation uncovered 26 issues—including drawing index mismatches, floor transition detail references, and demo/finish plan coordination—before permit.

26
Issues found
2
Disciplines
2
Codes referenced
Start with $100 creditSee the findings

Enterprise & volume pricing

Key findings

Drawing Index Audit: 3 missing, 23 mismatched out of 45 sheets

Unspecified

Critical

45 index entries | 19 perfect matches | 23 mismatched | 3 missing Mismatched (23): ID00.01: Expected: GRAPHIC SYMBOL LEGEND | Actual: DRAWING SYMBOLS AND NOTES (p2) ID00.03: Expected: ELECTRICAL/ MECHANICAL NOTES & SYMBOL LEGEND | Actual: ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL NOTES (p4) ID00.10: Expected: SCHEDULES - FINISH SCHEDULE AND DOOR SCHEDULE | Actual: FINISH SCHEDULE (p...

Floor Transition Legend on ID06.00 references details 01, 02, 03 on sheet ID12.00, but ID12.00 contains only Coffee Bar millwork details

Architectural

Critical

The Floor Transition Legend on sheet ID06.00 (Level 01 Floor Finish Plan) directs the contractor to sheet ID12-00 for three floor transition details: detail 01 (RF to TL transition), detail 02 (RF to RF transition), and detail 03 (RF to CPT transition). However, sheet ID12.00 is titled "TYPICAL MILLWORK DETAILS - COFFEE BAR" and its details 01, 02, 03 (and 04) are all "SECTION DETAIL OF COFFEE ...

Keynote 22 cross-reference mismatch: ID01.00 directs to ID02.00 for relocated power outlets, but ID02.00 Note 22 addresses switches instead

Electrical

High

Sheet ID01.00 (Demo Plan) Note 22 instructs the contractor to relocate two existing power outlets and explicitly references sheet ID02.00 for the new locations. However, on sheet ID02.00 (Proposed Power & Data Plan), Note 22 addresses the relocation of existing switches (not power outlets) and directs the contractor to electrical drawings instead. The same keynote number '22' carries entirely d...

Paint Finish Tags for Room 121 Differ Between Floor Finish Plan (PT-06) and Interior Elevations (PT-04, PT-03)

Architectural

High

The room finish tag on sheet ID06.00 for PET GROOMING 121 lists paint finishes including PT-01 and PT-06 (appearing in the wall and base lines of the tag). However, the corresponding interior elevations on sheet ID11.02, detail 01 (PET SPA ROOM ELEVATION), specify paint finishes PT-01, PT-04 (upper/mid wall zones), and PT-03 (wainscot/lower wall zone) across elevations B, C, and D. Elevation A ...

ID11.00 Elevation A (“BELL AT THE PIKE”) references ID12.02 leasing office desk details

Architectural

High

On sheet ID11.00 (Main Lobby interior elevations), Elevation A for the “BELL AT THE PIKE” feature wall includes detail callouts to “ID12-02” (details 01 and 02). However, the referenced sheet ID12.02 is titled as typical millwork details for the “LEASING OFFICE DESK” and its details are labeled “SECTION DETAIL OF LEASE OFFICE DESK,” which does not match the lobby feature wall/signage condition ...

Room numbering conflicts between ID01.00 Demo Plan and ID02.00 Proposed Power/Data Plan (Pet Grooming vs Package Room)

Architectural

High

Sheet ID01.00 labels the Pet Grooming room as Room 120 and the Package Room as Room 119, while sheet ID02.00 labels the Package Room as Room 120 and the Pet Grooming room as Room 121. This creates a direct conflict where Room 120 refers to different rooms depending on the sheet, even though ID01.00 explicitly directs the contractor to use ID02.00 for new outlet location coordination.

Room Number Conflict: Door Schedule swaps Manager Office (117) and Lease Office (117A) vs Floor Plan assignments

Architectural

High

The Door Schedule on sheet ID00.10 assigns D-01 (MANAGER OFFICE) to Room 117 and D-02 (LEASE OFFICE) to Room 117A. However, the Level 01 Floor Finish Plan on sheet ID06.00 labels Room 117 as LEASING and Room 117A as MANAGER'S OFFICE. The room numbers are swapped between these two sources. Additionally, the Door Schedule is internally inconsistent: both D-01 (MANAGER OFFICE) and D-03 (LEASE OFFI...

Co-work Desk Finish Conflict: Sheet Note 08 specifies "PT FINISH" (Paint) while Millwork Details specify PLAM (Plastic Laminate)

Architectural

High

Sheet note 08 on ID11.03 describes the custom co-work desk as having "PT FINISH" (paint), while the millwork detail sections on ID12.04 consistently specify PLAM-01 and PLAM-02 (plastic laminate) for all desk surfaces. Furthermore, even the elevation D on ID11.03 itself tags the desk components with PLAM-01 and PLAM-02 material labels, contradicting its own sheet note. Paint and plastic laminat...

Reception desk detail callouts on Elevation B (ID11.00) reference sheet ID12-01 instead of ID12.05

Architectural

High

Interior Elevation B on sheet ID11.00 contains four detail reference callouts (01, 02, 03, 04) that all point to sheet "ID12-01" for the custom reception desk area. However, the actual reception desk millwork details—with matching detail numbers 01, 02, 03, and 04—are located on sheet ID12.05, titled "TYPICAL MILLWORK DETAILS - RECEPTION DESK." The sheet number in the elevation callouts (ID12-0...

Break Room 118 shown as separate room on Power Plan (ID02.00) but absent from RCP (ID03.00); Room 117 named differently

Electrical

High

On the Power & Data Plan (ID02.00), two distinct rooms are labeled in the southwest area of the suite: "BREAK ROOM 118" (with kitchenette fixtures DW, REF, sink, and GFCI outlets) and "LEASE OFFICE 117" below it. On the Reflected Ceiling Plan (ID03.00), the same spatial area shows only one room labeled "LEASING 117" — the break room casework/sink area visible in the RCP tile description is incl...

Issue categories

Architectural
Egress, accessibility, room layouts, finish plans, and building code compliance
Document Coordination
Drawing index, sheet matching, and cross-discipline coordination

More example findings

Drawing Index Audit: 3 missing, 23 mismatched out of 45 sheets
Unspecified
Critical

Summary: 45 index entries | 19 perfect matches | 23 mismatched | 3 missing Mismatched (23): ID00.01: Expected: GRAPHIC SYMBOL LEGEND | Actual: DRAWING SYMBOLS AND NOTES (p2) ID00.03: Expected: ELECTRICAL/ MECHANICAL NOTES & SYMBOL LEGEND | Actual: ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL NOTES (p4) ID00.10: Expected: SCHEDULES - FINISH SCHEDULE AND DOOR SCHEDULE | Actual: FINISH SCHEDULE (p...

Why it matters: Addressing this before construction prevents rework and supports code compliance.

Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve before construction.

RFI draft: Please clarify: Drawing Index Audit: 3 missing, 23 mismatched out of 45 sheets

Floor Transition Legend on ID06.00 references details 01, 02, 03 on sheet ID12.00, but ID12.00 contains only Coffee Bar millwork details
Architectural
Critical

Summary: The Floor Transition Legend on sheet ID06.00 (Level 01 Floor Finish Plan) directs the contractor to sheet ID12-00 for three floor transition details: detail 01 (RF to TL transition), detail 02 (RF to RF transition), and detail 03 (RF to CPT transition). However, sheet ID12.00 is titled "TYPICAL MILLWORK DETAILS - COFFEE BAR" and its details 01, 02, 03 (and 04) are all "SECTION DETAIL OF COFFEE ...

Why it matters: Floor transition details are essential for the contractor to properly install transitions between resilient flooring (RF), tile (TL), and carpet (CPT). Without the correct detail reference, the GC and flooring subcontractor cannot determine the required transition strip type, profile, material, o...

Suggested next step: Please clarify the correct sheet reference for floor transition details 01, 02, and 03 currently called out in the Floor Transition Legend on ID06.00 as being on sheet ID12-00. Sheet ID12.00 contains only Coffee Bar millwork section details. Please confirm whether (a) the floo...

RFI draft: Please clarify the correct sheet reference for floor transition details 01, 02, and 03 currently called out in the Floor Transition Legend on ID06.00 as being on sheet ID12-00. Sheet ID12.00 contains only Coffee Bar millwork section details. Pleas...

Keynote 22 cross-reference mismatch: ID01.00 directs to ID02.00 for relocated power outlets, but ID02.00 Note 22 addresses switches instead
Electrical
High

Summary: Sheet ID01.00 (Demo Plan) Note 22 instructs the contractor to relocate two existing power outlets and explicitly references sheet ID02.00 for the new locations. However, on sheet ID02.00 (Proposed Power & Data Plan), Note 22 addresses the relocation of existing switches (not power outlets) and directs the contractor to electrical drawings instead. The same keynote number '22' carries entirely d...

Why it matters: During construction, the GC will look at ID02.00 keynote 22 expecting to find the new location for two power outlets from the Package Room area, but will instead find an instruction about switch relocation. This will cause confusion about where to install the relocated outlets, potentially delayi...

Suggested next step: Request the designer clarify the new locations for the two existing power outlets referenced in ID01.00 Sheet Note 22. Confirm whether ID02.00 Note 22 should address power outlet relocation (as cross-referenced) or switch relocation, and update both sheets so keynote 22 conten...

RFI draft: Request the designer clarify the new locations for the two existing power outlets referenced in ID01.00 Sheet Note 22. Confirm whether ID02.00 Note 22 should address power outlet relocation (as cross-referenced) or switch relocation, and update bo...

Paint Finish Tags for Room 121 Differ Between Floor Finish Plan (PT-06) and Interior Elevations (PT-04, PT-03)
Architectural
High

Summary: The room finish tag on sheet ID06.00 for PET GROOMING 121 lists paint finishes including PT-01 and PT-06 (appearing in the wall and base lines of the tag). However, the corresponding interior elevations on sheet ID11.02, detail 01 (PET SPA ROOM ELEVATION), specify paint finishes PT-01, PT-04 (upper/mid wall zones), and PT-03 (wainscot/lower wall zone) across elevations B, C, and D. Elevation A ...

Why it matters: Conflicting paint finish designations between the floor finish plan and the interior elevations will create ambiguity during material procurement and paint application. The contractor will not know whether to follow PT-06 per the plan or PT-04/PT-03 per the elevations, potentially leading to inco...

Suggested next step: Confirm the correct paint finish designations for Room 121. Should the wall and base finishes be PT-06 as indicated on ID06.00, or PT-04 and PT-03 as shown on the ID11.02 interior elevations? Update the conflicting sheet accordingly and verify the finish schedule is consistent.

RFI draft: Confirm the correct paint finish designations for Room 121. Should the wall and base finishes be PT-06 as indicated on ID06.00, or PT-04 and PT-03 as shown on the ID11.02 interior elevations? Update the conflicting sheet accordingly and verify the...

ID11.00 Elevation A (“BELL AT THE PIKE”) references ID12.02 leasing office desk details
Architectural
High

Summary: On sheet ID11.00 (Main Lobby interior elevations), Elevation A for the “BELL AT THE PIKE” feature wall includes detail callouts to “ID12-02” (details 01 and 02). However, the referenced sheet ID12.02 is titled as typical millwork details for the “LEASING OFFICE DESK” and its details are labeled “SECTION DETAIL OF LEASE OFFICE DESK,” which does not match the lobby feature wall/signage condition ...

Why it matters: If the callouts remain as-is, the contractor/millwork fabricator may use leasing office desk sections for the lobby feature wall/base millwork, leading to incorrect fabrication, installation conflicts, and schedule/cost impacts.

Suggested next step: Please confirm the correct detail/sheet references for ID11.00 Elevation A (“BELL AT THE PIKE”) feature wall/base millwork. If ID12.02 is not intended, provide the correct sheet/detail numbers or issue the appropriate millwork details for this lobby condition and revise the el...

RFI draft: Please confirm the correct detail/sheet references for ID11.00 Elevation A (“BELL AT THE PIKE”) feature wall/base millwork. If ID12.02 is not intended, provide the correct sheet/detail numbers or issue the appropriate millwork details for this lob...

Room numbering conflicts between ID01.00 Demo Plan and ID02.00 Proposed Power/Data Plan (Pet Grooming vs Package Room)
Architectural
High

Summary: Sheet ID01.00 labels the Pet Grooming room as Room 120 and the Package Room as Room 119, while sheet ID02.00 labels the Package Room as Room 120 and the Pet Grooming room as Room 121. This creates a direct conflict where Room 120 refers to different rooms depending on the sheet, even though ID01.00 explicitly directs the contractor to use ID02.00 for new outlet location coordination.

Why it matters: Conflicting room numbers can cause power/data devices (and any associated demolition/relocation work) to be installed in the wrong room, complicate field verification, and create coordination errors across disciplines and inspections.

Suggested next step: Confirm the correct room numbering for Pet Grooming and Package Room for Level 01, and revise ID01.00 and/or ID02.00 so Room 120 consistently identifies the same space across the drawing set (and update any related device/outlet location callouts accordingly).

RFI draft: Confirm the correct room numbering for Pet Grooming and Package Room for Level 01, and revise ID01.00 and/or ID02.00 so Room 120 consistently identifies the same space across the drawing set (and update any related device/outlet location callouts ...

Room Number Conflict: Door Schedule swaps Manager Office (117) and Lease Office (117A) vs Floor Plan assignments
Architectural
High

Summary: The Door Schedule on sheet ID00.10 assigns D-01 (MANAGER OFFICE) to Room 117 and D-02 (LEASE OFFICE) to Room 117A. However, the Level 01 Floor Finish Plan on sheet ID06.00 labels Room 117 as LEASING and Room 117A as MANAGER'S OFFICE. The room numbers are swapped between these two sources. Additionally, the Door Schedule is internally inconsistent: both D-01 (MANAGER OFFICE) and D-03 (LEASE OFFI...

Why it matters: This room number mismatch will cause confusion during construction for door installation, hardware keying, signage coordination, and any trade referencing room numbers. Doors may be installed in incorrect openings or configured with wrong hardware if not resolved prior to construction.

Suggested next step: Request clarification on the correct room number assignments for the Manager's Office and Lease Office. Confirm whether Room 117 is the Leasing/Lease Office and Room 117A is the Manager's Office (per the Floor Plan), and update the Door Schedule entries D-01 and D-02 accordingly.

RFI draft: Request clarification on the correct room number assignments for the Manager's Office and Lease Office. Confirm whether Room 117 is the Leasing/Lease Office and Room 117A is the Manager's Office (per the Floor Plan), and update the Door Schedule e...

Co-work Desk Finish Conflict: Sheet Note 08 specifies "PT FINISH" (Paint) while Millwork Details specify PLAM (Plastic Laminate)
Architectural
High

Summary: Sheet note 08 on ID11.03 describes the custom co-work desk as having "PT FINISH" (paint), while the millwork detail sections on ID12.04 consistently specify PLAM-01 and PLAM-02 (plastic laminate) for all desk surfaces. Furthermore, even the elevation D on ID11.03 itself tags the desk components with PLAM-01 and PLAM-02 material labels, contradicting its own sheet note. Paint and plastic laminat...

Why it matters: This conflict directly impacts millwork shop drawings, material procurement, and pricing. A desk fabricated for paint finish requires a different substrate preparation (e.g., MDF with primer) compared to one designed for plastic laminate application. The millwork fabricator cannot proceed until t...

Suggested next step: Please clarify the intended finish for the custom co-work desk on Level 04. Sheet note 08 on ID11.03 specifies "PT FINISH" (paint), while all four section details on ID12.04 and the material tags on the elevation itself specify PLAM-01 and PLAM-02 (plastic laminate). Which fin...

RFI draft: Please clarify the intended finish for the custom co-work desk on Level 04. Sheet note 08 on ID11.03 specifies "PT FINISH" (paint), while all four section details on ID12.04 and the material tags on the elevation itself specify PLAM-01 and PLAM-02...

Reception desk detail callouts on Elevation B (ID11.00) reference sheet ID12-01 instead of ID12.05
Architectural
High

Summary: Interior Elevation B on sheet ID11.00 contains four detail reference callouts (01, 02, 03, 04) that all point to sheet "ID12-01" for the custom reception desk area. However, the actual reception desk millwork details—with matching detail numbers 01, 02, 03, and 04—are located on sheet ID12.05, titled "TYPICAL MILLWORK DETAILS - RECEPTION DESK." The sheet number in the elevation callouts (ID12-0...

Why it matters: This cross-reference mismatch can cause the general contractor and millwork subcontractor to look for reception desk details on the wrong sheet. If sheet ID12-01 exists as a separate sheet with unrelated details, the contractor may either build from wrong information or lose time tracking down th...

Suggested next step: Request clarification on whether the detail callouts (01, 02, 03, 04) on Elevation B of sheet ID11.00 should reference sheet ID12.05 (where the reception desk millwork details are shown) instead of ID12-01. If sheet ID12-01 is a separate valid sheet, clarify which sheet govern...

RFI draft: Request clarification on whether the detail callouts (01, 02, 03, 04) on Elevation B of sheet ID11.00 should reference sheet ID12.05 (where the reception desk millwork details are shown) instead of ID12-01. If sheet ID12-01 is a separate valid she...

Break Room 118 shown as separate room on Power Plan (ID02.00) but absent from RCP (ID03.00); Room 117 named differently
Electrical
High

Summary: On the Power & Data Plan (ID02.00), two distinct rooms are labeled in the southwest area of the suite: "BREAK ROOM 118" (with kitchenette fixtures DW, REF, sink, and GFCI outlets) and "LEASE OFFICE 117" below it. On the Reflected Ceiling Plan (ID03.00), the same spatial area shows only one room labeled "LEASING 117" — the break room casework/sink area visible in the RCP tile description is incl...

Why it matters: If Break Room 118 and Room 117 (Lease Office / Leasing) are in fact separate rooms, the RCP is missing ceiling layout, lighting design, and sprinkler coordination for the break room. Conversely, if they were intentionally combined, the Power Plan must be updated to reflect a single room. The inco...

Suggested next step: Request clarification on whether Break Room 118 is a separate room from Room 117 (Leasing/Lease Office). If separate, request the RCP be updated to show Break Room 118 with its own ceiling layout, lighting, and room tag. Also confirm the correct room name for Room 117 — 'LEASE...

RFI draft: Request clarification on whether Break Room 118 is a separate room from Room 117 (Leasing/Lease Office). If separate, request the RCP be updated to show Break Room 118 with its own ceiling layout, lighting, and room tag. Also confirm the correct r...

Fixture L01 shown in Co-Work Room (Level 04) and Yoga Room (Level 06) on RCPs but schedule lists only 'MANAGER OFFICE & WAITING ROOM'
Electrical
High

Summary: The Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11 lists fixture L01 (CYLINDER DOWNLIGHT) with a location of 'MANAGER OFFICE & WAITING ROOM' only. However, fixture tag L-01 also appears on the Level 04 Co-Work Room RCP (ID03.01) and in the Yoga Room on the Level 06 Fitness Center and Yoga RCP (ID03.02). Neither the Co-Work Room nor the Yoga Room is listed as a location for L01 in the schedule. On ID03...

Why it matters: This discrepancy affects fixture procurement quantities, specifications, and coordination. If L01 is intended for these additional locations, the schedule must be updated with correct quantities and locations. If different fixtures were intended for the Co-Work Room and Yoga Room, the RCP fixture...

Suggested next step: Please confirm whether fixture L01 (CYLINDER DOWNLIGHT) is intended for the Co-Work Room (Level 04) and the Yoga Room (Level 06) in addition to the Manager Office & Waiting Room. If so, please update the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11 to include these additional locat...

RFI draft: Please confirm whether fixture L01 (CYLINDER DOWNLIGHT) is intended for the Co-Work Room (Level 04) and the Yoga Room (Level 06) in addition to the Manager Office & Waiting Room. If so, please update the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11 to ...

RCP sheet note references 'PICTURE LIGHT' and directs to Lighting Schedule, but no such fixture exists in the schedule
Electrical
High

Summary: Sheet note 01 on ID03.00 (Proposed RCP - Level 01) states '(N) PICTURE LIGHT, SEE LIGHTING SCHEDULE,' directing the contractor to the Lighting Schedule for specification information. However, the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11 does not include any fixture described as a 'PICTURE LIGHT.' The schedule lists seven fixtures L01 through L07 (Cylinder Downlight, Wall Sconces, LED Tape Light,...

Why it matters: Without a picture light entry in the Lighting Schedule, the contractor has no specification, manufacturer, finish, or quantity information for this fixture. This affects procurement, pricing, and installation coordination. A picture light is a distinct fixture type used to illuminate artwork, dif...

Suggested next step: Sheet note 01 on ID03.00 references a '(N) PICTURE LIGHT, SEE LIGHTING SCHEDULE,' but no picture light fixture is listed in the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11. Please add the picture light to the schedule with manufacturer, product, finish, size, quantity, and locatio...

RFI draft: Sheet note 01 on ID03.00 references a '(N) PICTURE LIGHT, SEE LIGHTING SCHEDULE,' but no picture light fixture is listed in the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11. Please add the picture light to the schedule with manufacturer, product, finis...

Picture Light referenced in Leasing Office Elevation (Note 12) is missing from the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11
Electrical
Medium

Summary: Sheet ID11.01 (Interior Elevations) includes Sheet Note 12 which states '(N) PICTURE LIGHT, SEE LIGHTING SCHEDULE.' This note is called out in the Leasing Office Elevation A with a leader arrow pointing to a fixture location. However, the Decorative Lighting Schedule on sheet ID00.11 lists only seven fixtures (L01 through L07): Cylinder Downlight, Wall Sconce (multiple), LED Tape Light, and Lin...

Why it matters: Without a corresponding schedule entry, the picture light fixture lacks manufacturer, product model, color/finish, size, quantity, and procurement/installation responsibility designations. This will prevent proper pricing, ordering, and coordination of the fixture, potentially delaying constructi...

Suggested next step: Please add the Picture Light fixture to the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11, including manufacturer, product, color/finish, size, quantity, technical information, and furnished-by/installed-by designations. Alternatively, clarify if an existing schedule entry (e.g., L0...

RFI draft: Please add the Picture Light fixture to the Decorative Lighting Schedule on ID00.11, including manufacturer, product, color/finish, size, quantity, technical information, and furnished-by/installed-by designations. Alternatively, clarify if an exi...

Yoga Room Featured Wall Length: Plan Shows 10'-10 5/8" (ID02.02) vs. Section Detail Shows 10'-10 3/4" (ID12.03)
Architectural
Medium

Summary: The floor plan on sheet ID02.02 dimensions the yoga room featured wall length along the left side of the YOGA room as 10'-10 5/8". The section detail 03 on sheet ID12.03, titled "SECTION DETAIL OF YOGA ROOM FEATURED WALL," dimensions the overall length of the same featured wall assembly as 10'-10 3/4". This is a 1/8" discrepancy. Since the section detail depicts the featured wall panel running ...

Why it matters: If the featured wall millwork is fabricated to the section detail dimension of 10'-10 3/4", it would be 1/8" longer than the room dimension shown on the plan (10'-10 5/8") and could not be installed between the two end walls. The GC and millwork fabricator require a single confirmed dimension to ...

Suggested next step: Please clarify the correct featured wall length for the Yoga Room (636A): is it 10'-10 5/8" as dimensioned on the plan (ID02.02) or 10'-10 3/4" as dimensioned on the section detail 03 (ID12.03)? Please confirm which dimension governs for millwork fabrication and update the con...

RFI draft: Please clarify the correct featured wall length for the Yoga Room (636A): is it 10'-10 5/8" as dimensioned on the plan (ID02.02) or 10'-10 3/4" as dimensioned on the section detail 03 (ID12.03)? Please confirm which dimension governs for millwork ...

Fireplace feature wall overall length: plan ID02.00 shows 10'-6 1/8" vs section details on ID12.01 show 10'-6"
Architectural
Medium

Summary: The power & data plan on sheet ID02.00 dimensions the fireplace feature wall in LOBBY 116 with an overall length of 10'-6 1/8" (broken into 1'-2" + 8'-2 1/8" + 1'-2"). The plan includes a detail callout "03/04 ID-12.01" pointing directly to this element. On the referenced sheet ID12.01, both Section Detail 03 and Section Detail 04 of the fireplace wall show an overall length of 10'-6". The 1/8"...

Why it matters: For custom millwork fabrication, the overall dimension of the fireplace wall must be precisely coordinated between the plan and the millwork detail sections. A 1/8" discrepancy, while small, can propagate through shop drawing preparation and panel/stone fabrication. Additionally, the sub-dimensio...

Suggested next step: Request the designer clarify the correct overall length of the fireplace feature wall in LOBBY 116: is it 10'-6 1/8" as dimensioned on plan ID02.00, or 10'-6" as shown in Section Details 03 and 04 on sheet ID12.01? Also request confirmation of the intermediate dimension breakd...

RFI draft: Request the designer clarify the correct overall length of the fireplace feature wall in LOBBY 116: is it 10'-6 1/8" as dimensioned on plan ID02.00, or 10'-6" as shown in Section Details 03 and 04 on sheet ID12.01? Also request confirmation of the...

This is an anonymized example. Findings shown are excerpts for illustration. Actual project details have been modified to protect client confidentiality.

Related case studies

Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies

First $100 covered

Want this on your next set?

Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.

  • Median 87 issues per project
  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

View all case studies|See pricing