Master Plan Mixed-Use: 237 Issues Found
An anonymized master plan review uncovered cross-discipline coordination and code issues, before construction.
First $100 covered. Enterprise and volume pricing
- Potential findings
- 237
- Disciplines
- 5
- Codes referenced
- 5
- Critical or high examples shown
- 15
About this review
InspectMind ran an AI plan review on this project set and returned 237 potential findings across Structural, Architectural, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing. The selected examples below show the document conflict, why it matters, and a suggested next step.
- Disciplines
- Structural, Architectural, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing
- Potential findings
- 237
- Examples shown
- 15
Key findings
- Critical
Issue #270
Structural
Issue #270
- Critical
Issue #87
Architectural
Issue #87
- Critical
Issue #39
Fire Protection
Issue #39
- Critical
Issue #34
Architectural
Issue #34
- Critical
Issue #102
Architectural
Issue #102
- Critical
Issue #71
Structural
Issue #71
- Critical
Issue #70
Structural
Issue #70
- Critical
Issue #74
Structural
Issue #74
- Critical
Issue #77
Architectural
Issue #77
- Critical
Issue #90
Architectural
Issue #90
Issue categories
- Structural
- Structural connections, load paths, foundation design, and structural code compliance
- Architectural
- Egress, accessibility, room layouts, building code compliance, and finish specifications
- Electrical
- Electrical systems, panelboards, circuits, emergency power, and electrical code compliance
- Mechanical
- HVAC systems, ventilation, exhaust, refrigerant piping, and mechanical code compliance
- Plumbing
- Plumbing fixtures, drainage, venting, water supply, and plumbing code compliance
Review details and suggested questions
Issue #270Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #270
Why it matters: Addressing this issue before construction prevents costly rework and ensures code compliance for Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #270
Issue #87Architectural
Critical
Architectural
Summary: Issue #87
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #87
Issue #39Fire Protection
Critical
Fire Protection
Summary: Issue #39
Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders in Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #39
Issue #34Architectural
Critical
Architectural
Summary: Issue #34
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #34
Issue #102Architectural
Critical
Architectural
Summary: Issue #102
Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval for Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #102
Issue #71Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #71
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #71
Issue #70Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #70
Why it matters: This coordination issue could lead to field conflicts and change orders in Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #70
Issue #74Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #74
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #74
Issue #77Architectural
Critical
Architectural
Summary: Issue #77
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #77
Issue #90Architectural
Critical
Architectural
Summary: Issue #90
Why it matters: Addressing this issue before construction prevents costly rework and ensures code compliance for Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #90
Issue #93Architectural · NFPA 275
Critical
Architectural · NFPA 275
Summary: Issue #93
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #93
Issue #109Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #109
Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval for Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #109
Issue #82Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #82
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #82
Issue #80Architectural
Critical
Architectural
Summary: Issue #80
Why it matters: This issue could cause code violations and may prevent plan approval for Mixed-Use projects.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #80
Issue #81Structural
Critical
Structural
Summary: Issue #81
Why it matters: Failure to address this issue may result in construction delays and costly rework during Mixed-Use construction.
Suggested next step: Review drawings and specifications to resolve this conflict before construction begins.
RFI draft: Please clarify: Issue #81
This is an anonymized example. Findings shown are excerpts for illustration. Actual project details have been modified to protect client confidentiality.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline.
- MEP CommercialPDC Plan Review: 273 Issues Found273 issues · Architectural, Structural
- MEP CommercialPlan Review: 263 Issues Found263 issues · Architectural, Civil
- MEP CommercialAutomotive Facility: 258 Issues Found258 issues · Structural, Architectural
- MEP CommercialEvents Center 30% Set: 258 Issues Including Critical Fire & Egress Violations258 issues · Structural, Architectural
- MEP CommercialRiverside CA Plan Review: 256 Issues Found256 issues · Architectural, Civil
- MEP CommercialPlan Review: 255 Issues Found255 issues · Architectural, Electrical