InspectMind AI logo InspectMind
ArchitecturalCivilElectricalGeneral

Ottawa Commercial Plan Review: 2731 Issues Found

An anonymized Ottawa commercial plan review uncovered coordination and code issues across disciplines—before permit.

2731
Issues found
8
Disciplines
2
Codes referenced
Start with $100 creditSee the findings

Enterprise & volume pricing

Key findings

Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 1 mismatched out of 68 sheets

General

Critical

68 index entries | 67 perfect matches | 1 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (1): S137: Expected: ROOF / PENTHOUSE FLOOR CONCRETE LAYOUT PLANS (S137) | Actual: ROOF / PENTHOUSE FLOOR CONCRETE LAYOUT PLANS (S107)(p47)

Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 6 mismatched out of 12 sheets

General

Critical

12 index entries | 6 perfect matches | 6 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (6): L1.03: Expected: LEVEL 10 LANDSCAPE PLAN (L1.03) | Actual: LANDSCAPE PLAN LEVEL 10 EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA (L1.03)(p4) L1.04: Expected: LEVEL 10 PAVING PATTERN (L1.04) | Actual: PAVING PATTERN LEVEL 10 EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA (L1.04)(p5) L1.05: ...

Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 0 mismatched out of 26 sheets

General

Critical

26 index entries | 25 perfect matches | 0 mismatched | 1 missing Missing (1) — listed in drawing index but not found in the document: T: - T-000 COVER PAGE

Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 13 mismatched out of 144 sheets

General

Critical

144 index entries | 131 perfect matches | 13 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (13): A2.20: Expected: LEVEL P3 - REFLECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.20) | Actual: LEVEL P3 - REFECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.20)(p38) A2.21: Expected: LEVEL P2 - REFLECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.21) | Actual: LEVEL P2 - REFECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.21)(p39) A2.22: ...

Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 0 mismatched out of 91 sheets

General

Critical

91 index entries | 90 perfect matches | 0 mismatched | 1 missing Missing (1) — listed in drawing index but not found in the document: Mechanical: - M-000 COVER PAGE

Missing Structural Oil Pit in Hydro Vault 118

Architectural

Critical

The Architectural Floor Plan (A2.03) explicitly details an 'OIL PIT' with electrical grating in Hydro Vault 118, including dimensions for the pit. However, the corresponding location on the Structural Slab Edge Plan (A2.63) shows a continuous slab surface with a 'LINE OF HYDRO DUCT BELOW SLAB' and does not provide the required slab depression,...

Missing Garbage Chute on Penthouse Floor Plan vs. Slab Edge Plan

Architectural

Critical

Drawing A2.72 (Penthouse Level - Slab Edge Plan) specifies a 'GARBAGE CHUTE SLAB OPENING' in the central core area. Additionally, drawing A2.32 (Level 15 - Reflected Ceiling Plan) shows 'GARB. CHUTE 1504' directly below this location. However, drawing A2.12 (Floor Plan - Penthouse Level) fails to show a garbage chute or enclosing shaft walls in...

Inconsistent Architectural Layout for Main Electrical Room and Hydro Vault

Electrical

Critical

The Ground Floor Power Plan (E-353) and the Enlarged Plan View (1/E-600) use conflicting architectural layouts for the primary electrical spaces between grids H and L. The Enlarged Plan (E-600) shows the Hydro Vault extending from grid H to grid K, with 'ELECTRICAL ROOM 11' (housing main equipment like SWBD6-1) located between grids K and L....

Contradicting Specifications for Lighting Fixture L38

Electrical

Critical

The 'LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE' on the site plan (E-151) defines fixture L38 as an exterior 3.9W FX Luminaire. Conversely, the 'LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE' on E-900 defines L38 as an interior 40/50/60W Magic Light fixture for the Ground Floor Amenity. Both E-151 and E-253 floor plans use the 'L38' tag for these completely different applications.

Conflicting Function for Room 105 (LAN Room vs. Dog Wash / Suite)

General

Critical

The Security Core Riser diagram states that the main network distribution hub is 'LAN ROOM [0105]' on the Ground Floor. However, the Ground Floor ICAT Plan contradicts this by assigning Room 105 to a 'DOG WASH' and a residential 'SUITE'. No LAN Room is shown on the floor plan.

Issue categories

Architectural
Egress, accessibility, room layouts, building code compliance, and finish specifications
Structural
Structural connections, load paths, foundation design, and structural code compliance
Electrical
Electrical systems, panelboards, circuits, and electrical code compliance
Mechanical
HVAC systems, ventilation, exhaust, and mechanical code compliance
Plumbing
Plumbing fixtures, drainage, venting, water supply, and plumbing code compliance
Civil
Site grading, utilities, stormwater, and civil coordination
Landscape
Landscape and site improvement coordination
General
Drawing index, coordination, and general plan review findings

More example findings

Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 1 mismatched out of 68 sheets
General
Critical

Summary: 68 index entries | 67 perfect matches | 1 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (1): S137: Expected: ROOF / PENTHOUSE FLOOR CONCRETE LAYOUT PLANS (S137) | Actual: ROOF / PENTHOUSE FLOOR CONCRETE LAYOUT PLANS (S107)(p47)

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 6 mismatched out of 12 sheets
General
Critical

Summary: 12 index entries | 6 perfect matches | 6 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (6): L1.03: Expected: LEVEL 10 LANDSCAPE PLAN (L1.03) | Actual: LANDSCAPE PLAN LEVEL 10 EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA (L1.03)(p4) L1.04: Expected: LEVEL 10 PAVING PATTERN (L1.04) | Actual: PAVING PATTERN LEVEL 10 EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA (L1.04)(p5) L1.05: ...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 0 mismatched out of 26 sheets
General
Critical

Summary: 26 index entries | 25 perfect matches | 0 mismatched | 1 missing Missing (1) — listed in drawing index but not found in the document: T: - T-000 COVER PAGE

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Drawing Index Audit: 0 missing, 13 mismatched out of 144 sheets
General
Critical

Summary: 144 index entries | 131 perfect matches | 13 mismatched | 0 missing Mismatched (13): A2.20: Expected: LEVEL P3 - REFLECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.20) | Actual: LEVEL P3 - REFECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.20)(p38) A2.21: Expected: LEVEL P2 - REFLECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.21) | Actual: LEVEL P2 - REFECTED CEILING PLAN (A2.21)(p39) A2.22: ...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Drawing Index Audit: 1 missing, 0 mismatched out of 91 sheets
General
Critical

Summary: 91 index entries | 90 perfect matches | 0 mismatched | 1 missing Missing (1) — listed in drawing index but not found in the document: Mechanical: - M-000 COVER PAGE

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Missing Structural Oil Pit in Hydro Vault 118
Architectural
Critical

Summary: The Architectural Floor Plan (A2.03) explicitly details an 'OIL PIT' with electrical grating in Hydro Vault 118, including dimensions for the pit. However, the corresponding location on the Structural Slab Edge Plan (A2.63) shows a continuous slab surface with a 'LINE OF HYDRO DUCT BELOW SLAB' and does not provide the required slab depression,...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Missing Garbage Chute on Penthouse Floor Plan vs. Slab Edge Plan
Architectural
Critical

Summary: Drawing A2.72 (Penthouse Level - Slab Edge Plan) specifies a 'GARBAGE CHUTE SLAB OPENING' in the central core area. Additionally, drawing A2.32 (Level 15 - Reflected Ceiling Plan) shows 'GARB. CHUTE 1504' directly below this location. However, drawing A2.12 (Floor Plan - Penthouse Level) fails to show a garbage chute or enclosing shaft walls in...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Inconsistent Architectural Layout for Main Electrical Room and Hydro Vault
Electrical
Critical

Summary: The Ground Floor Power Plan (E-353) and the Enlarged Plan View (1/E-600) use conflicting architectural layouts for the primary electrical spaces between grids H and L. The Enlarged Plan (E-600) shows the Hydro Vault extending from grid H to grid K, with 'ELECTRICAL ROOM 11' (housing main equipment like SWBD6-1) located between grids K and L....

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Contradicting Specifications for Lighting Fixture L38
Electrical
Critical

Summary: The 'LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE' on the site plan (E-151) defines fixture L38 as an exterior 3.9W FX Luminaire. Conversely, the 'LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE' on E-900 defines L38 as an interior 40/50/60W Magic Light fixture for the Ground Floor Amenity. Both E-151 and E-253 floor plans use the 'L38' tag for these completely different applications.

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Conflicting Function for Room 105 (LAN Room vs. Dog Wash / Suite)
General
Critical

Summary: The Security Core Riser diagram states that the main network distribution hub is 'LAN ROOM [0105]' on the Ground Floor. However, the Ground Floor ICAT Plan contradicts this by assigning Room 105 to a 'DOG WASH' and a residential 'SUITE'. No LAN Room is shown on the floor plan.

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Spatial and Grid Layout Conflict for Suite 709 (2BED BF - 2H-BF)
Architectural
Critical

Summary: The Level 7-9 floor plan (T-459) designates Suite 709 as '2BED BF - 2H-BF' and locates it between horizontal grids 9 and 12, with a demising wall at grid 9 separating it from Suite 708. However, the corresponding typical unit plan for '2BED BF - 2H-BF' (T-474, Detail 4) shows a footprint that extends above grid 9 down to grid 12. Specifically,...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

MUA-1 Gas Heating Leaving Air Temperature Discrepancy
Mechanical
Critical

Summary: The 'DDC SEQUENCE OF OPERATION' on M-709 dictates that the MUA-1 gas burner will fire to 'MAINTAIN THE SUPPLY AIR SETPOINT, ADJUSTABLE, INITIAL SETPOINT OF 80°F'. Conversely, the 'MAKE-UP AIR UNIT - GAS HEATING SCHEDULE' on M-900 indicates a design Leaving Air Temperature ('L.A.T. D.B. (°C)') of '9.2' (48.6°F).

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Uncoordinated Equipment Layout and Incomplete Enlarged Plan for Water Supply Room
Mechanical
Critical

Summary: The Water Supply Room (P1-02) located between Grids A-C and 10-12 contains a spatial clash and cross-reference mismatch. The Fire Protection plan (M-552) locates the 'FIRE PUMP SKID' (JP-1, FP-1) and PRV Station in the exact same footprint where the Plumbing plan (M-253) locates incoming water lines and backflow preventers ('BP-1A', 'BP-1B',...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Incorrect Project Reference in Control Sequences (Copy-Paste Error)
Mechanical
Critical

Summary: The project file paths listed on the borders of the roof plans (M-267 and M-366) identify the project as '989 Somerset Apartments' (e.g., '989 Somerset Apartments-QCG ME Model_R23.rvt'). However, the Heating & Cooling Schematic (M-709) includes a major controls sequence section titled '299 CITY CENTRE PLANT CONTROL SEQUENCES'. This indicates...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

Emergency Generator Natural Gas Piping Sizing and Routing Direction Conflict
Mechanical
Critical

Summary: There is a contradiction regarding both the pipe size and routing direction for the natural gas line serving the emergency generator. The Level 16 Plumbing plan (M-266) specifies 'NATURAL GAS PIPING UP TO SERVE EMERGENCY GENERATOR ON ROOF'. The Enlarged Penthouse Mechanical Room plan (M-600 Detail 1) aligns with the upward routing but specifies...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft:

This is an anonymized example. Findings shown are excerpts for illustration. Actual project details have been modified to protect client confidentiality.

Related case studies

Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies

First $100 covered

Want this on your next set?

Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.

  • Median 87 issues per project
  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

View all case studies|See pricing