Tenant Fit-Out: 92 Issues Flagged
Check the fit-out scope against inherited shell-building notes, storefront dimensions, and the issued specification set.
Enterprise & volume pricing
Anonymized review · Published 2026-09-16
What this review documents
Check the fit-out scope against inherited shell-building notes, storefront dimensions, and the issued specification set.
The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.
Key findings
Specification sheets are absent from the reviewed set
General & Coordination
Six specification pages listed in a 25-page index were not found in the submitted documents.
Next step: Provide the missing specifications or correct the index before relying on cross-document review.
Storefront width differs by one foot
Architectural
The floor plan dimensions the new storefront at 48 feet 5 5/8 inches, while enlarged views show 47 feet 5 5/8 inches.
Next step: Resolve the overall width before storefront shop drawings or fabrication.
Shell-building note conflicts with fit-out code data
Architectural / Fire Protection
A life-safety note leaves occupant load to a future tenant permit, while the same set identifies a tenant fit-out and calculates 48 occupants.
Next step: Update the scope note and confirm the occupant-load and exit assumptions.
Issue categories
Review details and suggested questions
Specification sheets are absent from the reviewed setGeneral & CoordinationHigh
Summary: Six specification pages listed in a 25-page index were not found in the submitted documents.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Provide the missing specifications or correct the index before relying on cross-document review.
RFI draft: Provide the missing specifications or correct the index before relying on cross-document review.
Storefront width differs by one footArchitecturalHigh
Summary: The floor plan dimensions the new storefront at 48 feet 5 5/8 inches, while enlarged views show 47 feet 5 5/8 inches.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Resolve the overall width before storefront shop drawings or fabrication.
RFI draft: Resolve the overall width before storefront shop drawings or fabrication.
Shell-building note conflicts with fit-out code dataArchitectural / Fire ProtectionHigh
Summary: A life-safety note leaves occupant load to a future tenant permit, while the same set identifies a tenant fit-out and calculates 48 occupants.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Update the scope note and confirm the occupant-load and exit assumptions.
RFI draft: Update the scope note and confirm the occupant-load and exit assumptions.
Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies
Want this on your next set?
Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.
- Evidence-linked findings
- 5+ issues or full refund
- Results in hours
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required