InspectMind AI logo InspectMind
Educational Guide

AI Plan Check Benchmarks: How Many Issues Does a Review Find?

Benchmarks from a 497-project case-study dataset: how many issues an AI plan check finds, by project size and discipline.
First $100 covered

Run one real project first

Upload drawings, specs, and codes. Eligible work emails get a $100 credit and cited issues in hours.

  • $100 first-check credit
  • Work email required
  • Results in hours

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

See sample report

Across a 497-project InspectMind case-study dataset, the median construction project surfaces 87 issues in an AI plan check, with an average of about 175. Counts range from a single issue on small sets to 5,199 on the largest project reviewed. As a working rule of thumb, an AI review finds roughly 70 issues per 100 drawing sheets. These benchmarks are drawn from real projects, not estimates.

Issues found per project

  • Median: 87 issues per project
  • Average: ~175 issues per project
  • Range: 1 to 5,199 issues
  • Rule of thumb: ~70 issues per 100 sheets

The median (87) is well below the average (175) because a handful of very large, multi- discipline sets pull the average up. For a typical permit set, the median is the more useful expectation.

Distribution by issue count

How the 497 analyzed project records break down by the number of issues found:

  • 1–10 issues: 26 projects
  • 11–25 issues: 45 projects
  • 26–50 issues: 75 projects
  • 51–100 issues: 126 projects
  • 101–200 issues: 109 projects
  • 201–500 issues: 91 projects
  • 501–1,000 issues: 14 projects
  • 1,000+ issues: 11 projects

Over 80% of projects land between 10 and 500 issues. Sets above 1,000 issues are almost always large, multi-building or multi-discipline submissions.

Which disciplines drive the most issues?

In the case-study corpus, structural and architectural drawings appear most frequently, followed by electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and civil. Many of the most expensive findings are not within a single discipline at all — they are cross-discipline coordination conflicts (duct vs. structure, fixtures vs. plan, panel clearances) that only surface when every discipline is reviewed against the others.

Why a high issue count is good news

Finding more issues before construction is the goal, not a red flag. Fixing a problem in design is roughly 10x cheaper than fixing it in the field, where the same conflict becomes an RFI, a change order, or rework. A thorough pre-submission review that surfaces 200 issues you can resolve on paper is far cheaper than discovering a fraction of them after the concrete is poured.

See the underlying projects in the case study library, or explore severity, discipline, and recurring issue patterns in the 2026 Construction Drawing Error Index. Read how the review works in How It Works.

How these benchmarks were measured

Figures are aggregated from a fixed 497-project InspectMind case-study dataset. The public case-study library provides project-level examples with issue counts and evidence-linked findings. Across the broader platform, InspectMind has reviewed 2,800+ submitted projects for 2,000+ customer accounts. Benchmarks vary with discipline mix, design stage, and set quality, and are provided as general guidance.

First $100 covered

Ready to run this check?

Upload PDF drawings and specs. Get flagged issues with evidence and code citations in hours.

  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours
  • No demo required

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

Sample report: 282 issues found|Pricing after first check

227,181+ customer-visible issues across 2,000+ customer accounts