InspectMind AI reviews your construction documents for code compliance gaps, coordination conflicts, and spec discrepancies before you submit. That means fewer correction cycles, cleaner permit submissions, and submittal reviews that stop piling up during construction.
First $100 covered · 5+ issues or full refund · From $50 per upload after
Trusted by 2,000+ customer accounts including
Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance
Every correction notice from the AHJ costs your team unbudgeted hours and signals to your client that something slipped through. Repeated resubmission cycles erode the trust you built during design, often on issues a thorough internal review would have caught. The problem is not effort. It is that manual QA at the end of a project sprint is inconsistent by nature, and manual review processes don't scale to the volume and complexity modern documentation demands.
When submittals stack up faster than your project architects can review them, contractors wait, schedules slip, and you absorb the pressure from every direction. Reviewing each submittal against the drawings and specs manually is time-consuming work that compounds across a busy portfolio. A backlog is not a staffing problem. It is a workflow problem.
Conflicts between architectural, structural, and MEP documents that go undetected during design become RFIs, change orders, and sometimes disputes during construction. Finding them in the field is always more expensive than finding them at your desk. Your QA process needs to catch what tired eyes miss at the end of a document production sprint.
InspectMind AI runs a structured, evidence-based review of your documents in hours, not weeks, so your team resolves issues before submission rather than after. Unlike annotation tools that require a reviewer to identify problems manually, InspectMind actively analyzes your documents against code requirements and cross-discipline coordination rules, then delivers findings tied to specific sheets and sections your team can act on immediately.
Run your architectural drawings through InspectMind before submission and receive findings pinned to specific sheet numbers and code sections. The Architectural Checker evaluates accessibility compliance, egress requirements, occupancy classifications, and more across your full document set. You get a prioritized list of issues your team can resolve before the AHJ ever sees the package.
Discrepancies between your specifications and drawings are among the most common sources of RFIs and change orders, and among the hardest to catch manually across hundreds of sheets. The Spec and Drawing Coordination Checker cross-references your specs against your drawings to surface conflicts before they reach the field. Your project team gets the specific location and language of each discrepancy, so resolution is straightforward rather than investigative.
Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing coordination issues are responsible for a significant share of plan check comments and field conflicts on complex projects. The MEP Plan Review Checker analyzes your MEP documents for code compliance, system coordination conflicts, and cross-discipline clashes. Catching these issues during design is the difference between a clean permit submittal and a second round of corrections.
When the construction phase submittal queue is running ahead of your review capacity, InspectMind closes the gap without adding headcount. The Submittal Review Checker compares submitted product data, shop drawings, and samples against your project specifications and drawings, flagging non-conformances with specific references. Your project architects spend their time making approval decisions, not hunting through spec sections.
Upload your built for ae design consultants drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.
203 Issues Found on a Mid-Rise Multifamily Project|Compare AI plan check tools
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required
These reviews show what InspectMind surfaces on real projects, with the kind of evidence your team needs to act.
On a mid-rise multifamily project, InspectMind identified 203 issues, each tied to specific drawing sheets and code references. The design team received the specifics needed to resolve every item before the documents were submitted. That is the difference between a clean first submission and a correction cycle that your client sees.
Read full case studyInspectMind identified coordination and code compliance issues across Charlan Brock Architects' documents before submission to the AHJ. Surfacing those issues internally, with drawing references attached, gave the team a clear path to resolution rather than a correction notice. For AE firms, that sequence is exactly the workflow improvement that protects both schedule and client confidence.
Read full case studyPesco Engineering received multiple findings, each with specific drawing references and code citations, in hours rather than weeks. When your QA turnaround is measured in hours, you still have time to resolve issues before submission deadlines. That speed changes how your team plans the end of every project phase.
Read full case studyInspectMind gives your team a full code and coordination review in hours, so plan check comments stop being the way you find out what was missed. Start your first review and see what your documents contain before they leave your office.
Start with $100 credit5+ issues or full refund · No demo required
