InspectMind AI reviews your construction documents for code compliance gaps, sheet-to-sheet coordination conflicts, and spec inconsistencies before the AHJ sees them. Catch the issues that trigger plan check comments and resubmission cycles while you still have time to fix them.
Trusted by architecture & engineering firms
A door schedule that conflicts with the floor plan, a detail that references the wrong specification section, a note carried over from a previous project. These are the issues reviewers catch and you pay for. Each correction letter adds weeks to your schedule and signals to the client that the documents were not ready.
Your team checks what time allows. On large document sets, exhaustive cross-discipline coordination review before submission is rarely possible at the pace projects move. AI plan review covers what manual review misses, particularly the pattern-based conflicts that span dozens of sheets and are easy to overlook under deadline pressure.
Permit delays push construction starts, which strains contractor relationships and exposes you to schedule liability. Repeated plan check comments from the same AHJ affect how your firm is perceived on future projects in that jurisdiction. The reputational cost of a third correction letter is harder to quantify than the fee impact but no less real.
InspectMind AI analyzes your drawings and specifications against code requirements and internal document coordination standards, returning findings with specific sheet references and applicable code sections in hours, not weeks. Where PDF markup tools require a human to know what to look for, InspectMind systematically checks the full document set against defined criteria every time.
The Architectural Checker cross-references your floor plans, schedules, details, and notes to surface conflicts between drawing sets and flag departures from code requirements. Every finding is tied to the specific sheet and section where the issue appears, so your team can locate and resolve it without hunting.
Accessibility compliance failures are among the most common plan check comments and among the most preventable. The ADA Compliance Checker reviews your documents against current accessibility standards and returns findings with the specific code reference and drawing location, before a plan checker or inspector finds them first.
Egress paths, occupancy separations, fire-rated assembly callouts, and suppression system coordination are all areas where a missed conflict can stop a permit or trigger a field correction. The Fire and Life Safety Checker reviews these elements across your document set and flags issues with the precision your reviewers need to act on them immediately.
Discrepancies between specifications and drawings generate RFIs, change orders, and contractor claims long after permit is issued. The Spec and Drawing Coordination Checker identifies conflicts between your written specifications and the drawn conditions so your documents say the same thing in both places, and you control the resolution rather than reacting to a question in the field.
Submit documents that are ready, not documents that come back. Run your set through InspectMind before your next submission and see what is in there.
Upload your architects & engineers drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.
“After my first call with Aakash Prasad, I knew they were head and shoulders above their peers in the marketplace. We put our first project through (750+ drawings, multifamily), and the tool flagged most of the major issues we knew about, plus 97 others that escaped our review. Working with someone who treats us like a partner instead of just a client.”
These reviews were run on real project documents by firms that wanted to know what was in their sets before the AHJ did.
InspectMind reviewed Charlan Brock Architects' construction documents and identified coordination and code compliance issues across the architectural set before the documents were submitted to the authority having jurisdiction. Finding those issues internally meant the firm resolved them on their own schedule rather than responding to a correction letter. See the full review at the case study link.
Read the case studyPesco Engineering's document set was reviewed by InspectMind and returned multiple issues, each tied to the specific drawing and applicable code section. Delivery took hours rather than weeks, giving the team time to act before the submission deadline rather than after a comment letter arrived. Read the full case study for detail on what was found.
Read the case studyOn a K-12 school project reviewed at the 65% construction documents stage, InspectMind returned 276 issues. Because the review happened before the documents were finalized, every one of those findings could be addressed without a resubmission, a correction letter, or a schedule impact. That is the difference between a quality control review that happens at the right stage and one that happens after submission.
Read the case studyEach review runs on the same engine and returns findings cited to the sheet and code section.
Architectural Review Against Code and Your Own Documents
ADA Compliance Checked Systematically Across the Full Set
Fire and Life Safety Coordination Before It Reaches the Fire Marshal
Spec and Drawing Conflicts Resolved Before the Contractor Asks
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
Straight answers before your first check.
