QA/QC quality should not depend on who is assigned or how much time they have. InspectMind applies the same review standard to every project your firm runs, returning sheet-referenced issue reports in hours so problems get resolved before they reach the AHJ.
Trusted by architecture firm principals and QA/QC leads
QA/QC quality at most firms depends on which reviewer is available and how much time they have that week. That is a manageable risk on a single project. Across a full portfolio, it means some projects receive a careful second look and others do not. There is no way to tell which is which until an issue surfaces in the field or comes back from the AHJ. A consistent review standard cannot be built on individual availability. It requires a process that applies the same criteria to every project, regardless of who is leading it.
Cross-discipline coordination review does not scale evenly across every active project under deadline pressure. The projects moving fastest get the least thorough check, which is exactly backward from what the risk profile requires. AI plan review covers the full document set systematically, not just the sections a reviewer reaches before time runs out. That gap between what gets reviewed and what gets submitted is where field conflicts and correction letters originate.
A QA/QC process that lives in a reviewer's habits, rather than in a documented workflow, cannot be produced as evidence if a professional liability claim arises. Firms need a repeatable, evidenced process that shows the same standard was applied to every submission. An informal habit that varies by project and by person does not meet that bar.
InspectMind applies the same review criteria to every project a firm uploads, regardless of which principal or project architect is leading it. Upload the document set, confirm the applicable codes, and receive a sheet-referenced issue report in hours. The standard does not vary by project size, deadline pressure, or reviewer availability. Where a manual QC process depends on a person knowing what to look for and having time to look, InspectMind checks the full set against defined criteria every time. Every finding includes a specific sheet reference and applicable code section, so your team can locate and resolve each issue without hunting through the set.
The Architectural Checker cross-references floor plans, schedules, details, and notes for conflicts across every project the firm runs through it. It does not limit review to the sections a human reviewer flags as high-risk. Every finding is tied to the specific sheet where the conflict appears.
The ADA Compliance Checker applies the same accessibility review to every project automatically. Accessibility check depth no longer varies by reviewer experience or by how much time remains before a deadline. The same criteria are applied on the firm's smallest tenant improvement and its largest institutional project.
The plan check runs the same review the AHJ will run on every submission, firm-wide, before any project leaves the office. Issues that would trigger a correction letter get flagged while your team still has time to resolve them without a formal resubmission cycle.
The Constructability Checker flags buildability issues consistently across every project type the firm handles. Conflicts between structural and architectural elements, clearance problems, and sequencing issues get identified at the document stage rather than in the field.
More than 187,000+ potential issues have been found across 600+ companies before they reached the AHJ. From $50 per upload, no per-user fees, with a 5+ issues or full refund guarantee, there is no cost to finding out what is in your next set.
Upload your architecture firms drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.
“After my first call with Aakash Prasad, I knew they were head and shoulders above their peers in the marketplace. We put our first project through (750+ drawings, multifamily), and the tool flagged most of the major issues we knew about, plus 97 others that escaped our review. Working with someone who treats us like a partner instead of just a client.”
These reviews were run on real project document sets by firms that needed to know what was in their drawings before submission.
Thomas J. Owens, P.E., P.L.S., Assoc. AIA ran InspectMind's AI plan check before submitting a church project to the city and resolved roughly 300 issues before the AHJ reviewed the set. The result was a materially shorter correction letter. In his words: "We got fewer pages of city comments because the AI had already caught a lot of things that would have come back. Most of the comments are small and insignificant. We will easily wrap this up in only a few days."
Read the case studyInspectMind reviewed a large K-12 public school document set and identified 375 issues across the full set before the AHJ reviewed it. Finding those issues at the document stage meant the design team resolved them on their own schedule rather than responding to a formal correction cycle.
Read the case studyA complex healthcare facility document set was reviewed across multiple disciplines, returning 417 issues before construction. Healthcare projects carry elevated coordination risk across structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Catching those issues before the set left the design team prevented field conflicts in a project type where rework is especially costly.
Read the case studyEach review runs on the same engine and returns findings cited to the sheet and code section.
Architectural Review Across Floor Plans, Schedules, and Details
ADA Compliance Applied Consistently Across Every Submission
Pre-Submittal Plan Check Before Any Project Leaves the Office
Constructability Review Across Every Project Type the Firm Handles
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
Straight answers before your first check.
