InspectMind AI reviews your construction drawings for coordination conflicts, code violations, and constructability problems before mobilization. Issues caught in preconstruction cost a fraction of what they cost in the field.
Trusted by general contractors nationwide
A duct running through a beam, a pipe penetrating a shear wall, a dimension that doesn't add up between the architectural and structural sets. These conflicts exist in the drawings long before your crews find them. By the time an RFI hits your desk, the clock on rework cost has already started.
Your team is experienced, but no preconstruction reviewer can cross-reference hundreds of sheets across six disciplines and catch every conflict before bid or GMP. The sheer volume of a large commercial set makes gaps inevitable. AI plan review finds what manual review misses because it doesn't fatigue, skip sheets, or lose track of cross-discipline references.
Missing specifications, uncoordinated scope boundaries between trades, and code deficiencies that surface during inspection all become your problem to manage. Change orders erode the margin you built the estimate around. The owner remembers the final cost, not the reason for it.
The cost to resolve a conflict in a drawing set is a fraction of the cost to resolve it after concrete is placed or MEP is roughed in. Most GC teams don't have a systematic way to front-load that discovery. Preconstruction review that actually covers the full drawing set changes that math entirely.
InspectMind AI processes your complete drawing set and delivers findings tied to specific sheets, dimensions, and code sections. Unlike project management platforms that track issues after they are reported, InspectMind finds the issues before anyone sets foot on site.
InspectMind's constructability review flags sequencing conflicts, access constraints, missing details, and scope gaps that drive field rework. You get findings with the exact sheet references so your team can confirm them in context. Identifying these issues at bid or GMP stage protects the number you're signing your name to.
InspectMind's plan check review compares your submitted drawings against applicable building codes and flags deficiencies with the specific code section cited. Catching a violation before permit submission or inspection costs almost nothing to resolve. Catching it after an inspection failure costs time, credibility, and schedule.
MEP conflicts are the single largest source of field RFIs on most commercial projects. InspectMind's MEP plan review cross-references mechanical, electrical, and plumbing drawings against each other and against architectural and structural constraints. Conflicts flagged here get resolved in a coordination meeting, not in a ceiling that has to come back down.
InspectMind's structural review checks for missing details, connection conflicts, and coordination gaps between structural and architectural drawings. Errors in structural documents are among the most expensive to correct once work is in place. Surfacing them in preconstruction keeps the fix in the design team's hands, not yours.
Upload your drawing set and get a full cross-discipline review before your next project breaks ground. The findings come with specific sheet references so your team can act on them immediately.
Upload your general contractors drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.
“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”
These are real findings from real projects, each one caught before construction began.
Cold Summit Development's team put it plainly: InspectMind caught 47 issues that would have cost millions if they had made it to the field. For a GC, that's the difference between a profitable project and a painful one. Every one of those findings came with a specific drawing reference so the team could act on it immediately.
Read the case studyOn a large commercial development in Ottawa, InspectMind identified 2,731 issues spanning MEP, structural, civil, and architectural drawings before construction began. That volume of cross-discipline conflicts would have generated hundreds of RFIs and change orders if they had surfaced in the field. Finding them in preconstruction gave the project team time to resolve them without schedule or cost consequences.
Read the case studyOn a commercial office renovation, InspectMind found 906 issues including 164 critical code violations before mobilization. Each finding included the specific drawing sheet and the applicable code reference, so the team could prioritize and resolve them without guesswork. Critical violations found before work begins are a design problem. Found during inspection, they become a GC problem.
Read the case studyEach review runs on the same engine and returns findings cited to the sheet and code section.
Catch Constructability Problems Before the Estimate Is Final
Identify Code Violations Before the Jurisdiction Does
Resolve MEP Coordination Conflicts in the Drawing Set, Not the Ceiling
Verify Structural Drawings Before You Pour or Erect Anything
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
Straight answers before your first check.
