For Land Development Teams

QC your civil engineer's set before the AHJ does

AI cross-checks grading, utility, and site plans against the project spec book and your selected codes — so you walk into pre-submittal with a triaged list instead of a 200-line plan check.

Grading, utility, site, erosion

Full civil set in 1–2 hours

Severity-ranked, code-cited

Check your civil set · From $50 Watch demo

Grading, drainage, utilities, erosion — one set, one check. 5+ issues or full refund.

Trusted by 500+ companies including

187K+ issues caught•$50K+ avg value found per project

Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance

QC your consultant's work without becoming the bottleneck

AI flags the issues you would catch on a careful read, so you can spend your time on the ones that matter.

Pre-submittal QC

Catch utility-location and sizing mismatches between civil sheets, dimensional discrepancies between drawings, and missing call-outs before the package goes to the city.

Code-Year Drift

Flag code references that do not match the year or jurisdiction stated on the cover sheet — a common cause of plan check rejection.

Fewer Civil RFIs

Hand your civil engineer an already-triaged list with code citations and sheet references instead of a back-and-forth email chain.

Severity-Ranked

High / Medium / Low ranking so your team triages the critical issues first instead of reading 200 line items end to end.

What AI catches in a civil / land-dev set

The cross-sheet coordination work that slips through a one-pass review.

Grading & Drainage

Pipe elevations vs profile mismatches
Slope limits exceeded
Drainage calc vs detail mismatches
Missing erosion control callouts

Utility Coordination

Civil vs MEP utility clashes
Service location mismatches
Easement / right-of-way conflicts
Utility sizing discrepancies

Code Compliance

Code-year drift on civil sheets
Local design standard gaps
ADA slope and drainage
SWPPP / stormwater compliance

Cross-Sheet Errors

Cover sheet vs sheet index mismatches
Detail callouts pointing to wrong sheet
Boundary / setback discrepancies
Tract / parcel number drift

When to run it

A 30-minute QC pass that saves a plan-check cycle.

Pre-Submittal QC

Run before the package goes to the AHJ. Catch the obvious stuff your civil engineer would have caught on one more pass.

Fewer plan check comments
Cleaner first submittal
Faster permit

New Division / New Jurisdiction

When your team picks up a tract in a jurisdiction you haven't built in recently, AI flags code-year drift and local amendment gaps automatically.

Code-year confidence
Local amendment coverage
Lower jurisdiction risk

Multi-Tract Releases

Apply the same QC standard across every tract in a release. Same checks, same severity ranking, same export format.

Portfolio consistency
Scalable QA process
Cross-tract comparison

How it works for land development teams

Upload, review, send your civil engineer the triaged list.

Upload the civil set

Grading, utility, drainage, erosion, and the project manual. PDFs exported from Civil 3D or AutoCAD work as is.

Pick the applicable codes

Local building, energy, residential, plus any jurisdictional amendments — we host the full code library.

Review prioritized findings

Side-by-side viewer: click a finding, see the exact drawing region and code citation on the same screen.

Send to your civil engineer

Export the triaged list to PDF or CSV so your consultant has a clean punch list before resubmittal.

"Being able to check for codes and between pages, anything out of sync — that's hard for me to do. I like that you're specifying what is code, if it's critical, high, or medium. The cross-page checking catches things that are nearly impossible to find manually."

Julio

Owner, Pesco Engineering

ROI Calculator

See what one check saves you

Based on real data from 2,800+ projects and 58,000+ issues found.

Your project details

Construction value$5.0M

$500K$100M

Drawing sheets200

202,000

Projects per year

InspectMind cost

Up to 250 sheets · flat

$250

InspectMind

$250

One RFI

$3,500

One rework

$15,000

Estimated savings

Issues found

~140

20 Critical74 High46 Medium

Critical issues caught

Code violations, structural conflicts, rework avoided

$120K

High-severity issues caught

RFIs prevented, coordination clashes resolved

$52K

Medium issues caught

Drawing gaps, specification clarifications

$7K

Total estimated savings$179K

Return on investment

$250 investment → $179K saved

715x

One critical issue caught pays for 60 checks. Even the most skeptical estimate shows massive ROI — because catching problems in design costs 10–100x less than fixing them in the field.

Start free first check

5+ issues found or full refund guaranteed

How we calculate savings

Issue count: ~70 issues per 100 drawing sheets — our real average across 2,800+ completed projects.

Severity split: 14% Critical / 53% High / 33% Medium — from 58,000+ real issues exported from our production database.

Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. We use conservative "escape rates" — 40% for Critical, 20% for High, 10% for Medium — well below industry rework benchmarks (CII: 5–10% of project value).

Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K–$50K (scales with project value — rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), High $2K–$8K (RFI + delay), Medium $1.5K (minor rework). Based on CII, FMI, and Navigant construction industry research.

Learn More

Explore guides, articles, and case studies

Complete Guide

Ready to QC your next civil set?

Upload the package, run a check, walk into pre-submittal with a triaged list. From $50.

Start free first check Watch demo video See Examples