AI cross-checks grading, utility, and site plans against your project manual and selected codes, returning a severity-ranked issue list in 1–2 hours. Walk into pre-submittal with a triaged list instead of a 200-line plan check.
Trusted by land development teams at production homebuilders and developers
Civil submittals to municipal plan check carry long review cycles before you get a response. A correction set pushes back grading, utility installation, and pad preparation, and that slip carries directly into holding costs and downstream construction starts. The issues that trigger rejections are rarely complex. They are the kind of coordination gap that gets missed under deadline pressure.
When your civil engineer's drawings reference code editions or local amendments that do not match the year and jurisdiction on the cover sheet, the AHJ rejects the submittal. This happens on projects entering a new jurisdiction, on phased releases where the reference date was not updated, and on sets where different sheets were produced at different times. AI plan review for building codes flags these mismatches before you submit.
Your civil engineer hands you a drawing set with grading, utility, drainage, and erosion control sheets that all reference each other. Reviewing all of it carefully enough to catch what the city will catch does not happen consistently under schedule pressure. AI civil drawing review runs that cross-sheet check systematically, every time, against defined criteria your team selects.
Upload the civil set, including grading, utility, drainage, erosion control sheets, and the project manual. PDFs exported from Civil 3D or AutoCAD work as-is. Select the applicable codes from the library, and the AI returns a severity-ranked, code-cited, sheet-referenced issue list in 1–2 hours. The difference from a manual check is coverage consistency. Manual review catches what the reviewer has time and attention to find. AI applies the same criteria to every sheet in the set, including cross-sheet references, code edition matching, and detail-to-callout conflicts that span multiple drawing files.
Run before the package goes to the AHJ. The Civil Checker catches pipe elevation mismatches, utility clashes, drainage calc discrepancies, and missing erosion control callouts. The Plan Check Checker flags code-year drift and local amendment gaps before they generate a rejection letter. Each finding includes the sheet reference and the specific code section so your civil engineer can locate and resolve the issue without a back-and-forth.
When your team picks up a tract in a jurisdiction you have not built in recently, local adopted editions and amendments are easy to miss. The Building Codes Checker checks your drawings against the specific adopted edition for that jurisdiction and surfaces any reference drift or gap before the submittal goes out. This is the check that prevents the rejection letter that arrives six weeks after you thought you were in review.
On a multi-tract release, the risk is inconsistency. One tract gets a thorough review; another gets a quick pass because the deadline moved. The Constructability Checker catches field problems in grading, utility installation, and paving using the same severity ranking and export format across every tract. You get a cross-tract comparison instead of three different reviewers with three different thresholds.
Holding costs accumulate on a calendar, not on a correction letter. Run your civil set through InspectMind before your next submittal and find out what is in it before the AHJ does.
Upload your land development teams drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.
“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”
These reviews were run on real civil and infrastructure projects before the packages reached the AHJ.
Julio, Owner of Pesco Engineering, runs InspectMind on civil and land development document sets before submittal. His experience: "Being able to check for codes and between pages, anything out of sync, that's hard for me to do. I like that you're specifying what is code, if it's critical, high, or medium. The cross-page checking catches things that are nearly impossible to find manually." Pesco uses InspectMind to replace 40+ hours of manual review with a structured issue report that prioritizes findings by severity.
Read the case studyA complex transportation infrastructure project was reviewed before submittal, returning 43 issues across the civil document set. Findings included coordination conflicts and compliance gaps that would have required correction letters had they reached the AHJ. The review ran in hours, not weeks.
Read the case studyInspectMind reviewed the Cold Summit Development cold storage project and identified 47 critical issues, including site and civil coordination conflicts and spec-versus-drawing mismatches. Aaron Bass, Director of Construction at Cold Summit Development, said: "InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project, conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review." Site and civil conflicts were among the findings that would have carried into field rework without the pre-submittal review.
Read the case studyEach review runs on the same engine and returns findings cited to the sheet and code section.
Pre-Submittal QC: Catch What the AHJ Will Catch
Pre-Submittal QC: Catch What the AHJ Will Catch
New Division or New Jurisdiction: Flag Local Code Differences Automatically
Multi-Tract Releases: Apply the Same QC Standard Across Every Tract
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
Straight answers before your first check.
