InspectMind AI logo InspectMind
For Project Owners

Verify Your Design Team's Work Before You Commit

You hired the design team. Now verify their work independently, before you lock in a price or send documents to the building department. InspectMind AI reviews your drawings and specs for code gaps, coordination conflicts, and missing information, and returns a plain, prioritized issue list you can act on.

First $100 covered · 5+ issues or full refund · From $50 per upload after

Trusted by 2,000+ customer accounts including

227K+ customer-visible issues$50K+ avg value found per project

Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance

What You Cannot See When You Trust Your Design Team's Self-Review

You Are Paying for Work You Have No Independent Way to Verify

Your design team submits drawings, certifies they are coordinated, and expects your approval. But the only review those documents receive before you sign off is the same team's internal check. There is no independent set of eyes on the work unless you hire one, and most owners never do until something goes wrong.

Design Errors Found in the Field Become Your Problem, Not the Designer's

A missed coordination conflict in the drawings does not stay on paper. It becomes a change order, a schedule delay, or a contractor dispute. Owners absorb the financial impact of late discovery more than any other party, because change orders come out of contingency and schedule slippage affects financing, occupancy, and tenants.

Without a Technical Background, You Have No Way to Judge Document Readiness

Right now, the answer to "are these drawings ready to submit?" comes from the same team that produced them. That is not an independent assessment. Most owners have no practical alternative, so they sign off on documents they cannot fully evaluate and find out what was missed when the building department sends them back, or when the contractor calls with a field question.

Independent AI Review of Your Design Team's Documents, Without Needing a Technical Background

Upload your design team's drawings and specifications. InspectMind AI checks them against the applicable codes and against each other, then returns a plain, prioritized issue list with evidence for every finding. Each issue includes the drawing sheet reference and the specific code or document conflict that triggered it, so you can hand the report directly to your design team and ask for a response. You do not need a construction or design background to use the report. Every finding is written to identify what was found, where it appears in the documents, and why it matters.

Plan Check

The Plan Check runs the same review the building department will run before they issue a permit. You find out what is coming back before you submit, which means your team can fix it on your schedule rather than on the AHJ's correction letter timeline. For owners approaching a permit submission, this is the check that directly prevents resubmission delays.

Constructability Checker

The Constructability Checker flags buildability issues before they get priced into your GMP. If a contractor prices work from drawings that contain coordination conflicts or missing details, those gaps become assumptions. Those assumptions become change orders. Running a constructability check before you commit to a GMP price removes the most common source of post-GMP surprises.

Spec and Drawing Coordination

The Spec & Drawing Coordination checker finds the mismatches between what your specifications require and what your drawings actually show. These conflicts are the ones contractors use to justify change orders, because the contract is ambiguous about which document governs. Finding them before construction starts removes that ambiguity before anyone can exploit it.

First $100 covered

Try InspectMind on your next document set

Upload your project owners drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.

  • First $100 covered
  • Results in hours
  • 5+ issues or full refund

Cold Summit Development: 153 Issues Found Before Field Exposure|Compare AI plan check tools

Start with $100 credit

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

What Owners and Project Teams Found Before They Committed

These reviews were run on real project documents by teams that wanted independent verification before submission, pricing, or construction.

Cold Summit Development: 153 Issues Found Before Field Exposure

InspectMind reviewed Cold Summit Development's construction documents and returned 153 issues before the project reached the field. Aaron Bass, Director of Construction, said: "InspectMind helped us catch real meaningful issues. Using it early in the process is going to absolutely help out in the field." For an owner running their own review rather than relying solely on the design team's sign-off, that finding volume is exactly what independent verification is designed to surface.

Read full case study

K-12 School: 375 Issues Found Before the AHJ Reviewed the Set

A large public-owner K-12 school project went through InspectMind before the document set reached the building department. The review returned 375 issues across the full document set. Finding those issues internally gave the project team time to resolve them before the AHJ's review, rather than working through a correction letter under permit timeline pressure.

Read full case study

Healthcare Facility: 417 Issues Across a Complex Multi-Discipline Set

A complex healthcare facility project was reviewed across structural and other disciplines before construction. InspectMind returned 417 issues on a document set where coordination failures carry significant field cost and schedule consequences. For owners in high-stakes facility types, independent document review before commitment is the only way to know what is actually in the set.

Read full case study

Questions Owners Ask Before Running Their First Review

Does this replace my design team's own QC review, or work alongside it?

At what phase should I run this: schematic design, CDs, or right before permit?

What does the report look like if I don't have a construction or design background?

How do I bring findings back to my design team without it feeling adversarial?

What does a review cost, and how does that compare to a single change order?

Know What Is in Your Documents Before You Sign Off

You are the party with the most at stake when documents go to permit or to bid. Run your design team's drawings through InspectMind before you commit to a price or a submission date, and see what independent review finds.

Start with $100 credit

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required