Residential Renovation: 75 Issues Flagged

About this review

InspectMind ran an AI plan review on this residential set and returned 75 potential findings across Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing. The selected examples below show the document conflict, why it matters, and a suggested next step.

Project type

Residential

Disciplines

Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing

Potential findings

75

Published examples

3

Published

2026-09-16

Evidence status

Selected findings marked useful in the source review record

What this review documents

Check that architectural plans, sections, ventilation schedules, and wet-area details describe the same renovation scope.

The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.

• Open the sample report
• See pricing
• Read our measurement definitions

Key findings

1. Fireplace fuel type changes between views

   Architectural / Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing

   High

   The floor plan specifies a gas fireplace insert while the building section at the same location specifies an electric insert.

   Next step: Confirm the appliance and coordinate gas, power, venting, and architectural details.

2. Ridge-vent quantities do not reconcile

   Architectural

   High

   The attic schedule credits 9.13 square feet of ridge ventilation, while the two quantified roof-plan segments total 5.00 square feet.

   Next step: Reconcile the provided ventilation area with the roof layout and product rating.

3. Shower waterproofing extent differs from specification

   Architectural / Plumbing

   High

   The specification calls for waterproofing to extend four feet beyond a curbless shower threshold. The detail appears to terminate the pan membrane at the threshold.

   Next step: Clarify the required membrane continuity and adjacent-floor waterproofing detail.

Checkers used

• Architectural Checker
• Mechanical Checker
• Electrical Checker
• Plumbing Checker
• All checkers

Issue categories

Architectural / Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing

Architectural / Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing findings in the selected review excerpts.

Architectural

Architectural findings in the selected review excerpts.

Architectural / Plumbing

Architectural / Plumbing findings in the selected review excerpts.

Review details and suggested questions

Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.