Residential Renovation: 75 Issues Flagged
Check that architectural plans, sections, ventilation schedules, and wet-area details describe the same renovation scope.
Enterprise & volume pricing
Anonymized review · Published 2026-09-16
What this review documents
Check that architectural plans, sections, ventilation schedules, and wet-area details describe the same renovation scope.
The documented result is a set of review findings. This case study does not establish that corrections were completed or that savings were realized. The examples below were marked useful in the source review record; they have been paraphrased to remove identifying details.
Key findings
Fireplace fuel type changes between views
Architectural / Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing
The floor plan specifies a gas fireplace insert while the building section at the same location specifies an electric insert.
Next step: Confirm the appliance and coordinate gas, power, venting, and architectural details.
Ridge-vent quantities do not reconcile
Architectural
The attic schedule credits 9.13 square feet of ridge ventilation, while the two quantified roof-plan segments total 5.00 square feet.
Next step: Reconcile the provided ventilation area with the roof layout and product rating.
Shower waterproofing extent differs from specification
Architectural / Plumbing
The specification calls for waterproofing to extend four feet beyond a curbless shower threshold. The detail appears to terminate the pan membrane at the threshold.
Next step: Clarify the required membrane continuity and adjacent-floor waterproofing detail.
Issue categories
Review details and suggested questions
Fireplace fuel type changes between viewsArchitectural / Mechanical / Electrical / PlumbingHigh
Summary: The floor plan specifies a gas fireplace insert while the building section at the same location specifies an electric insert.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Confirm the appliance and coordinate gas, power, venting, and architectural details.
RFI draft: Confirm the appliance and coordinate gas, power, venting, and architectural details.
Ridge-vent quantities do not reconcileArchitecturalHigh
Summary: The attic schedule credits 9.13 square feet of ridge ventilation, while the two quantified roof-plan segments total 5.00 square feet.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Reconcile the provided ventilation area with the roof layout and product rating.
RFI draft: Reconcile the provided ventilation area with the roof layout and product rating.
Shower waterproofing extent differs from specificationArchitectural / PlumbingHigh
Summary: The specification calls for waterproofing to extend four feet beyond a curbless shower threshold. The detail appears to terminate the pan membrane at the threshold.
Why it matters: This discrepancy leaves the design team or contractor with conflicting instructions. Resolve the governing requirement before relying on the affected documents.
Suggested next step: Clarify the required membrane continuity and adjacent-floor waterproofing detail.
RFI draft: Clarify the required membrane continuity and adjacent-floor waterproofing detail.
Anonymized, paraphrased excerpts from a completed project review. These three examples were marked “good catch” in the source review record; that label is feedback, not independent validation. The project total excludes duplicate-group members, dismissed findings, wrong finds, and insufficient-reference findings. Only selected excerpts are published. Customer identity, project address, source identifiers, and private drawings are omitted. Corrections, permit outcomes, and financial savings have not been independently verified. A qualified professional should assess each finding against the complete project documents.
Related case studies
Similar AI plan review results by project type and discipline. Browse all case studies
Want this on your next set?
Start with the first $100 covered. See cited issues in hours, no call required.
- Evidence-linked findings
- 5+ issues or full refund
- Results in hours
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required