InspectMind AI reviews your construction drawings, specifications, and submittals to surface coordination conflicts, code violations, and constructability problems before your GC files the first RFI. Finding these issues on paper costs a fraction of what they cost in the field.
Trusted by owners & developers worldwide
Field-discovered conflicts trigger change orders, schedule extensions, and contractor claims that compound on each other. The fix that would have cost almost nothing at the drawing stage can cost 10 to 100 times more once work is in place. Your contingency budget was not sized for problems that should have been caught months earlier.
Architects and engineers check their own drawings under deadline pressure, which means the conflicts most likely to survive into construction are the ones that cross discipline boundaries. Mechanical runs through a structural member. Egress paths that violate code. Electrical panels with no clearance. These issues exist in your drawing set right now, and a traditional peer review will not reliably find them. See how AI plan review compares to manual review
GCs price risk into their bids and recover costs through change orders. Designers are insulated by their contracts. You absorb the schedule slippage, the lender penalties, and the carrying costs on a delayed asset. The only leverage you have is catching problems before they become change orders.
InspectMind AI reads your complete drawing set across all disciplines simultaneously, then delivers a prioritized findings report with every issue tied to a specific sheet, detail, and code section. Unlike traditional review methods, this is not sampling. It is a full-document pass completed in minutes to hours, not weeks.
InspectMind checks your drawings against current building, fire, accessibility, and energy codes relevant to your project type and jurisdiction. Every violation is flagged with the specific code section it conflicts with, so your design team can resolve it before permit submission or construction start. Learn more about how Plan Check works.
The platform cross-references structural drawings against architectural, mechanical, and electrical documents to surface conflicts that individual discipline reviewers routinely miss. Beam depths, column locations, and penetration conflicts are identified with sheet-level evidence before a single footing is poured. See what the Structural checker examines.
Room dimensions, door swings, egress paths, ceiling heights, and finish transitions are all evaluated for internal consistency and code conformance. The Architectural checker flags discrepancies between floor plans, sections, elevations, and schedules so your team resolves them on paper rather than in drywall.
InspectMind evaluates sequencing, access, tolerances, and installation conflicts that experienced field crews would immediately recognize as problems. Catching these issues before bidding gives you cleaner bid documents, more competitive pricing, and fewer contingency claims during construction. Explore the Constructability checker in detail.
Owners and developers who review before construction starts control their costs. Those who wait for the field to find problems pay for it in change orders, delays, and eroded returns.
Upload your owners & developers drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.
“InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review.”
These findings were delivered before construction started, which is the only point where they could be resolved without change orders.
InspectMind reviewed Cold Summit's drawings and surfaced 47 coordination and code compliance issues that the project team estimated would have cost millions to resolve in the field. Every issue was identified with drawing-level evidence before construction started. That is the difference between a pre-construction finding and a change order.
Read the case studyOn a multi-building wood-framed student housing project, InspectMind identified 1,497 issues spanning coordination conflicts, code violations, and constructability problems. Wood-framed multi-family construction has tight tolerances and dense MEP routing, exactly the conditions where field-discovered conflicts cascade into budget and schedule failures. This review happened before the project broke ground.
Read the case studyInspectMind reviewed a commercial office renovation and returned 906 issues, 164 of them critical violations spanning egress, electrical, fire protection, and plumbing. Renovations carry compounded risk because existing conditions complicate code compliance in ways new construction does not. All 906 issues were identified before construction started.
Read the case studyEach review runs on the same engine and returns findings cited to the sheet and code section.
Code compliance review across every applicable section.
Structural coordination checked against the full drawing set.
Architectural conflicts caught before they reach the field.
Constructability problems identified before your GC prices them in.
Drawing sets are sensitive. We treat them that way, with clear commitments on training, retention, and access.
We don’t train public AI or third-party models on your documents, and you can opt out of our own model improvement anytime.
Request deletion of any project, any time. NDAs are available for sensitive work.
Files live in secure cloud infrastructure with customer segregation.
Straight answers before your first check.
