Catch the conflicts your drawings are hiding before construction starts.

By the time an RFI lands on your desk, the damage is done.

Field-discovered conflicts trigger change orders, schedule extensions, and contractor claims that compound on each other. The fix that would have cost almost nothing at the drawing stage can cost 10 to 100 times more once work is in place. Your contingency budget was not sized for problems that should have been caught months earlier.

Your design team reviews their own work. That is the problem.

Architects and engineers check their own drawings under deadline pressure, which means the conflicts most likely to survive into construction are the ones that cross discipline boundaries. Mechanical runs through a structural member. Egress paths that violate code. Electrical panels with no clearance. These issues exist in your drawing set right now, and a traditional peer review will not reliably find them. See how AI plan review compares to manual review

You carry the financial risk your design and construction teams do not.

GCs price risk into their bids and recover costs through change orders. Designers are insulated by their contracts. You absorb the schedule slippage, the lender penalties, and the carrying costs on a delayed asset. The only leverage you have is catching problems before they become change orders.

Code compliance review across every applicable section.

InspectMind checks your drawings against current building, fire, accessibility, and energy codes relevant to your project type and jurisdiction. Every violation is flagged with the specific code section it conflicts with, so your design team can resolve it before permit submission or construction start. Learn more about how Plan Check works.

Structural coordination checked against the full drawing set.

The platform cross-references structural drawings against architectural, mechanical, and electrical documents to surface conflicts that individual discipline reviewers routinely miss. Beam depths, column locations, and penetration conflicts are identified with sheet-level evidence before a single footing is poured. See what the Structural checker examines.

Architectural conflicts caught before they reach the field.

Room dimensions, door swings, egress paths, ceiling heights, and finish transitions are all evaluated for internal consistency and code conformance. The Architectural checker flags discrepancies between floor plans, sections, elevations, and schedules so your team resolves them on paper rather than in drywall.

Constructability problems identified before your GC prices them in.

InspectMind evaluates sequencing, access, tolerances, and installation conflicts that experienced field crews would immediately recognize as problems. Catching these issues before bidding gives you cleaner bid documents, more competitive pricing, and fewer contingency claims during construction. Explore the Constructability checker in detail.

Try InspectMind on your next document set

Upload your built for owners & developers drawings. Eligible work emails get a first $100 covered ($100 credit). Results in hours.

• First $100 covered
• Results in hours
• 5+ issues or full refund

47 issues caught before Cold Summit Development broke ground.|Compare AI plan check tools

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

47 issues caught before Cold Summit Development broke ground.

InspectMind reviewed Cold Summit's drawings and surfaced 47 coordination and code compliance issues that the project team estimated would have cost millions to resolve in the field. Every issue was identified with drawing-level evidence before construction started. That is the difference between a pre-construction finding and a change order.

1,497 issues found across a student housing development before a single unit was framed.

On a multi-building wood-framed student housing project, InspectMind identified 1,497 issues spanning coordination conflicts, code violations, and constructability problems. Wood-framed multi-family construction has tight tolerances and dense MEP routing, exactly the conditions where field-discovered conflicts cascade into budget and schedule failures. This review happened before the project broke ground.

906 issues found on a commercial office renovation, including 164 critical violations.

InspectMind reviewed a commercial office renovation and returned 906 issues, 164 of them critical violations spanning egress, electrical, fire protection, and plumbing. Renovations carry compounded risk because existing conditions complicate code compliance in ways new construction does not. All 906 issues were identified before construction started.