Municipal Aquatics Center: 407 Issues Found

Summary: 139 indexed pages | 26 match | 0 minor mismatch | 0 mismatch | 113 missing Missing (113), listed in drawing index but not found in the document: General: - G-132 UL ASSEMBLY DETAILS SHEET: - SHEET 1 BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - SHEET 2 BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - SHEET 3 BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - SHEET...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft: 📄 G-001 Schedule Text: DRAWING INDEX, page 2

Summary: 10 indexed pages | 9 match | 1 minor mismatch | 0 mismatch | 0 missing Minor Mismatch (1): SWPPP-2: Expected: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP-2) | Actual: PAVING-GRADING-DRAINAGE PLAN (SWPPP-2)(p7) | Reason: Sheet number matches exactly and the page fits the expected SWPPP sequence, but the parsed title conflicts...

Why it matters:

Suggested next step:

RFI draft: 📄 C-1 Schedule Text: DRAWING INDEX, page 1 --- 📄 WS-1 Schedule Text: DRAWING INDEX, page 8

Summary: On the plumbing set, the COVERED POOL EQUIPMENT area includes a PT-1 tank field, and P-701 identifies PT-1 as a '1,000 WATER GALLON CAPACITY UNDERGROUND (36\' TOPSOIL COVER) PROPANE TANK (TYP x4)'. On the civil layout at the same COVERED POOL EQUIPMENT area, the site is laid out with 'PROP. ACCESSIBLE SIGN', 'PROP. WHEEL STOP (TYP.)', and the...

Why it matters: If both sheets are followed, four underground propane tanks requiring '36\' TOPSOIL COVER' would be installed where the civil sheet provides parking and accessible parking appurtenances. This is a permitting and construction conflict that should be resolved before site work and utility installation.

Suggested next step: Please confirm the final location of the PT-1 propane tank field relative to COVERED POOL EQUIPMENT. Revise either the civil parking/access layout or the plumbing propane layout so the underground tank field is not in the area labeled 'PROP. ACCESSIBLE SIGN', 'PROP. WHEEL STOP (TYP.)', and 'EXISTING PARKING LOT'.

RFI draft: Please confirm the final location of the PT-1 propane tank field relative to COVERED POOL EQUIPMENT. Revise either the civil parking/access layout or the plumbing propane layout so the underground tank field is not in the area labeled 'PROP. ACCESSIBLE SIGN', 'PROP. WHEEL STOP (TYP.)', and...

Summary: S101 assigns a large rectangular slab area to underground propane tanks: the plan shows keynotes 6 and 7 on that slab, and the keynote text states 'PROPANE TANKS BELOW THE GRADE SUPPORTED BY 12\' MAT SLAB' and 'PROPANE TANKS SHALL BE STRAPPED'. The mechanical drawings, however, identify the corresponding space as 'COVERED POOL EQUIPMENT 117',...

Why it matters: If not resolved, the contractor could build an underground propane-tank mat slab where the mechanical set expects an operable pool equipment room below-grade area. This affects excavation, gas and life-safety coordination, ventilation, equipment placement, and permit review.

Suggested next step: Please confirm whether the below-grade portion associated with the covered pool equipment room is intended for underground propane tanks or for mechanical pool-equipment use. Revise S101 and M-101/M-201 so the room use, below-grade construction, and required equipment/ventilation all match.

RFI draft: Please confirm whether the below-grade portion associated with the covered pool equipment room is intended for underground propane tanks or for mechanical pool-equipment use. Revise S101 and M-101/M-201 so the room use, below-grade construction, and required equipment/ventilation all match.

Summary: The landscape drawing treats the southwest corner as a curved south/west entry with accessible parking. The aquatic drawings treat that same southwest corner as the equipment/service connection zone containing 'MECH ROOM', 'PUMP PIT', 'SURGE TANK', and 'CHEM YARD'. Those two programs cannot occupy the same southwest corner without a major...

Why it matters: This affects accessible route planning, parking layout, service access, equipment placement, and associated utility work. If left unresolved, field layout, permitting review, and construction sequencing for the southwest corner will be compromised.

Suggested next step: Please issue a single coordinated southwest-corner plan showing whether that corner is the public entry/accessible parking area or the southwest equipment/service connection zone with MECH ROOM, PUMP PIT, SURGE TANK, and CHEM YARD, and revise the landscape/hardscape or aquatic drawings to match.

RFI draft: Please issue a single coordinated southwest-corner plan showing whether that corner is the public entry/accessible parking area or the southwest equipment/service connection zone with MECH ROOM, PUMP PIT, SURGE TANK, and CHEM YARD, and revise the landscape/hardscape or aquatic drawings to match.

Summary: T-501 labels the fire alarm control panel as 'FACP 120V EM CIRCUIT'. The electrical schedules place 'FACP' on 'PANEL: L1' at circuit 81, and the electrical riser shows 'PANEL L1 SEC. 1 PANEL L1 SEC. 2' on the TL1 branch while the DH1 schedule separately identifies 'STORM SWITCH - EH 100/3 SEE RISER'. These drawings do not agree whether the FACP...

Why it matters: This is a life-safety power-source coordination problem. If not resolved before construction, the FACP could be installed on the wrong feeder/panel, creating AHJ review issues, incorrect breaker labeling, and field rework.

Suggested next step: Please confirm the intended source for the FACP: should it remain on Panel L1 as shown in the panel schedule, or should it be fed from the 120V EM/storm-switch-backed source indicated on T-501? Revise the fire alarm riser, electrical riser, and panel schedules so the FACP source is consistent.

RFI draft: Please confirm the intended source for the FACP: should it remain on Panel L1 as shown in the panel schedule, or should it be fed from the 120V EM/storm-switch-backed source indicated on T-501? Revise the fire alarm riser, electrical riser, and panel schedules so the FACP source is consistent.

Summary: The enlarged plan for IT 113 shows circuit L1-81 at a 'J' point with keyed note ⑩, and keyed note ⑩ defines that point as a 'JUNCTION BOX FOR POWER TO SECURITY PANEL.' The panel schedule assigns circuit 81 to 'FACP.' The same circuit is therefore assigned to two different systems.

Why it matters: This creates a life-safety and system-coordination conflict. If left unresolved, the fire alarm control panel and the security system could be wired from the wrong dedicated branch circuit, causing permit, inspection, and commissioning problems.

Suggested next step: Please confirm whether circuit 81 is intended for the FACP or for the keyed note ⑩ security-panel junction box in IT 113, and revise the plan or panel schedule so the circuit assignment is consistent.

RFI draft: Please confirm whether circuit 81 is intended for the FACP or for the keyed note ⑩ security-panel junction box in IT 113, and revise the plan or panel schedule so the circuit assignment is consistent.

Summary: The drawing places equipment supply outside the work by listing 'SUPPLY OF EQUIPMENT OR MECHANICAL PARTS' under exclusions. Section 22 51 00 includes chemical equipment, filters, heaters and chillers, pool equipment, surge tanks, and piping systems in the work to be provided. The drawing note conflicts with the specification scope.

Why it matters: If this note remains, bidders and installers may treat major aquatic equipment procurement as excluded work. That can create a major scope gap, delayed procurement, and expensive change orders for core pool systems.

Suggested next step: Revise the exclusion note to align with Section 22 51 00 and explicitly state that the specified aquatic equipment and mechanical parts are included in the work to be provided.

RFI draft: Revise the exclusion note to align with Section 22 51 00 and explicitly state that the specified aquatic equipment and mechanical parts are included in the work to be provided.

Summary: The drawing identifies the competition pool as a 'Myrtha Panelized SST Competition Pool' and lists the pool area as 12,623.1 SF. The specification states: 'For basin structures that are larger than or equivalent to 3,000 sf (278.7 square m), the basin floor Must be poured-in-place (also known as “cast-in-place” or C.I.P). Concrete with...

Why it matters: This is a fundamental basin construction-type conflict, not a minor coordination item. The basin structural system affects structural design, embeds, waterproofing interfaces, procurement, and installation sequencing. If not resolved before permitting and fabrication, it can cause major redesign, approval delays, and substantial cost impact.

Suggested next step: Please confirm the required basin construction for the 12,623.1 SF competition pool. Revise the drawings or specifications so the pool consistently identifies either a Myrtha panelized SST pool system or a poured-in-place concrete floor with shotcrete walls per Section 13 11 14.

RFI draft: Please confirm the required basin construction for the 12,623.1 SF competition pool. Revise the drawings or specifications so the pool consistently identifies either a Myrtha panelized SST pool system or a poured-in-place concrete floor with shotcrete walls per Section 13 11 14.

Summary: The block diagram labels the source enclosure as 'LDP 208Y/120V 3Ø ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PANEL,' but the heat pump circuits are labeled '480V 3Ø' for HEAT PUMP 1 through HEAT PUMP 4. This means the heat pump power shown on the diagram does not match the labeled source panel voltage. The specification requires confirmed heat-pump electrical...

Why it matters: This is a construction-critical electrical coordination error. If the source voltage is not corrected before procurement and permitting, the heat pump feeders, disconnects, overcurrent protection, panel assignments, and associated electrical infrastructure will need redesign or field revision, creating delay and change-order risk.

Suggested next step: Please clarify the intended voltage and source panel for HEAT PUMP 1, HEAT PUMP 2, HEAT PUMP 3, and HEAT PUMP 4. Revise the functional block diagram so the heat pump source and feeder voltage are fully coordinated, and confirm the final electrical and disconnect requirements for the heat pump circuits.

RFI draft: Please clarify the intended voltage and source panel for HEAT PUMP 1, HEAT PUMP 2, HEAT PUMP 3, and HEAT PUMP 4. Revise the functional block diagram so the heat pump source and feeder voltage are fully coordinated, and confirm the final electrical and disconnect requirements for the heat pump...

Summary: The 24x24x30 drain sump assembly schedules the main drain as '24\'x24\'x30\' (WHITE) SCH 80, 12\' PORT' for a 'VGB COMPLIANT SUMP & GRATE.' The specification requires pool main suction outlets and sumps/drains to be SOFA assemblies and specifically requires a fiberglass pre-manufactured SOFA sump/drain, so the scheduled SCH 80 assembly...

Why it matters: Using a non-SOFA SCH 80 main drain assembly changes the specified sump, frame, and grate system and can trigger compliance review problems, procurement changes, and replacement after installation.

Suggested next step: Confirm whether the main drain at the 24x24x30 sump is intended to be a fiberglass pre-manufactured SOFA assembly. Revise the schedule/detail to match the specified SOFA material and assembly, or submit a formally approved alternate.

RFI draft: Confirm whether the main drain at the 24x24x30 sump is intended to be a fiberglass pre-manufactured SOFA assembly. Revise the schedule/detail to match the specified SOFA material and assembly, or submit a formally approved alternate.

Summary: The pool beam structure detail specifies '#8 SOLID COPPER GROUND WIRE CIRCULING THE POOL BASIN WITH (4) EQUAL DISTANT GROUND WIRES BONDED DIRECTLY TO SST BASIN PANELS.' The same sheet identifies the competition pool bulkhead as being 'FOR A 25 YARD POOL WIDTH.' Section 13 11 25 requires stainless-steel basins to have bonding/grounding...

Why it matters: This is a life-safety and inspection issue because the stainless-steel basin equipotential bonding layout is undercounted for the pool size shown. Correcting it after basin and deck work are installed would require added bonding jumpers and rework to completed construction.

Suggested next step: Revise the bonding detail to show the full quantity and spacing of SST basin bonding/grounding jumpers required around the 25-yard pool perimeter, including the required connection locations to the basin reinforcing steel grid with UL-listed bond/ground lugs.

RFI draft: Revise the bonding detail to show the full quantity and spacing of SST basin bonding/grounding jumpers required around the 25-yard pool perimeter, including the required connection locations to the basin reinforcing steel grid with UL-listed bond/ground lugs.

Summary: The applicable-codes note states 'NFPA 70: NATIONAL ELECTIC CODE, 2020 EDITION. CHAPTER 6, SECTION 680'. The same sheet's drawing index identifies 'WA-460 MECH ROOM 1 PANEL SCHEDULES', which confirms documented electrical panel/branch-circuit scope within this sheet set. NEC 210.1 provides the general requirements for branch circuits,...

Why it matters: The visual evidence supports a real inconsistency in the code note, but not the original report's definitive statement that Article 411 applies. Article 411 should be treated as conditional unless a low-voltage lighting system is shown elsewhere in the drawing set.

Suggested next step: Revise the applicable-codes note to identify the NEC more broadly for the shown electrical scope and confirm the additional governing articles for the electrical sheets, including Article 210 for branch circuits. If low-voltage lighting is actually part of the project, identify the applicable NEC lighting article as well in addition to Article 680.

RFI draft: Revise the applicable-codes note to identify the NEC more broadly for the shown electrical scope and confirm the additional governing articles for the electrical sheets, including Article 210 for branch circuits. If low-voltage lighting is actually part of the project, identify the applicable...

Summary: The sheet shows a '25A 1P' branch feeding the lighting cabinet branch, and the downstream equipment is identified as a 'LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING CONTROL CABINET (LVLC)' with 'LIGHT POWER SUPPLY' units sending '2 #14, 24VDC' to 'COMPETITION POOL LED LIGHT' fixtures. NEC 411.3 identifies this as a low-voltage lighting system, and NEC 411.7 requires...

Why it matters: This is a direct NEC conflict on the one-line. If installed as drawn, the lighting branch protection would need to be revised before approval and installation, with likely impacts to the upstream breaker selection and any related cabinet/power-supply arrangement.

Suggested next step: Please revise the branch circuit serving the 'LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING CONTROL CABINET (LVLC)' to a maximum 20A, or provide a code-based clarification demonstrating that the shown LED lighting assembly is not a lighting system governed by NEC 411.

RFI draft: Please revise the branch circuit serving the 'LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING CONTROL CABINET (LVLC)' to a maximum 20A, or provide a code-based clarification demonstrating that the shown LED lighting assembly is not a lighting system governed by NEC 411.

Summary: The sheet includes 'System No. CJ-D-0004' with a 'Joint Rating, 2 Hr' and shows it is classified 'to ASTM E2837.' Section 715.3.1 requires fire-resistant joint systems to be tested in accordance with either ASTM E1966 or UL 2079. The drawing therefore cites ASTM E2837 for this joint detail instead of the code-cited fire test standards for...

Why it matters: If this detail is left in the set as shown, the cited standard on the drawing may be challenged during permitting, submittal review, or inspection and could require coordination for a compliant listed system.

Suggested next step: Revise or replace System No. CJ-D-0004 so the drawing identifies a fire-resistant joint system tested in accordance with UL 2079 or ASTM E1966 and rated not less than the required fire-resistance rating of the assembly intersection.

RFI draft: Revise or replace System No. CJ-D-0004 so the drawing identifies a fire-resistant joint system tested in accordance with UL 2079 or ASTM E1966 and rated not less than the required fire-resistance rating of the assembly intersection.