AI Building Code Compliance Software
Catch building code issues before they trigger permit comments, redesign, or resubmission.
InspectMind gives architects, engineers, and contractors a faster AI building code review using the PDF drawings and specs they already produce. Upload your set, get flagged code issues with drawing references and exact citations, and fix problems before they reach the city.
Key takeaways
- Pre-submission review is cheaper than city comment cycles and permit delays.
- InspectMind runs on PDFs your team already issues—no IFC or municipal login required.
- Each finding ties to a drawing reference and exact code citation.
- Combine with plan check, discipline checkers, or case-study workflows for broader coverage.
In this guide
Why code violations are expensive to catch late
Code violations caught during city review force a predictable sequence: comment issued, drawings revised, set resubmitted, permit delayed. Each cycle costs time across the full project team. For architects and engineers, the cheaper fix is pre-submission—before the violation enters the AHJ's queue.
What happens when a violation reaches the field
When a violation surfaces during city review, the sequence is: comment issued, drawings revised, set resubmitted, permit delayed, and construction held pending approval. Egress width violations are a clean example; corridor widths calculated against IBC Table 1005.1 without accounting for sprinklered-building reductions create a cross-discipline revision that can hold an entire permit set. These are the kinds of cross-reference failures that a manual reviewer under deadline pressure regularly misses.
The private-sector gap in pre-submission review
Most automated building code tools today either operate within municipal permitting workflows or require an IFC or BIM model to run a review. InspectMind works from the same PDF drawing sets architects and engineers already produce; no model conversion, no municipal login, no change to how the set is prepared. That makes it a practical pre-submission step for private-sector teams at any stage of document production.
What the AI building codes checker reviews
InspectMind reviews the code categories most likely to generate permit comments, revision cycles, and approval delays. Instead of giving you a generic checklist, it shows what is wrong, where it appears, and which code section applies.
IBC and state building code conflicts
IBC conflicts most often surface as construction type mismatches, incorrect occupancy classifications, or height and area limit violations that are not flagged internally during document production. InspectMind checks drawings and specifications against the applicable IBC edition and relevant state amendments, returning a flagged report that shows the specific drawing sheet, detail, and code section for each conflict found.
NFPA fire and life safety code
InspectMind reviews drawings for NFPA-related gaps including fire-rated assembly requirements, suppression system coverage, and notification system documentation. For projects that need deeper fire-focused analysis, use the fire and life safety compliance checker.
Egress, fire ratings, and occupancy classification
Egress width violations occur when corridor and exit widths are calculated per occupant load using IBC Table 1005.1 without accounting for sprinklered-building reductions—a cross-reference failure manual reviewers under deadline pressure regularly miss. Fire-rating inconsistencies typically surface when the specified construction type does not align with the assembly ratings shown in the drawing set. InspectMind checks both before the set reaches the city.
Accessibility code compliance
InspectMind reviews accessibility-related issues against applicable code requirements and standards. For a dedicated accessibility review, use the ADA checker.
Energy, seismic, and specialty codes
Some permit delays come from missing or inconsistent specialty code information. InspectMind reviews energy documentation, seismic-related requirements, and other project-specific code conditions that need to appear clearly in the set.
Codes supported out of the box
InspectMind supports major code frameworks out of the box, and you can also upload local amendments, owner standards, or jurisdiction-specific supplements for review.
International
- IBC
- IFC
- IMC
- IPC
- IECC
NFPA and standards
- NFPA 13
- NFPA 70
- NFPA 72
- NFPA 101
- ADA Standards
- ASHRAE
California
- CBC 2019
- CBC 2022
- CBC 2025 (in progress)
Florida
- Florida Building Code 2023
North Carolina
- North Carolina Building Code 2024
Custom requirements
- Uploaded local amendments
- Owner standards
- Project-specific rules
How InspectMind AI reviews your drawings
InspectMind reviews PDF drawings and specifications against the selected codes, then returns a report with flagged issues, drawing references, and exact code citations. Your team can act on the findings before permit submission, reducing avoidable review cycles and keeping the set cleaner on first pass.
Upload
PDF drawings, specifications, and supporting code documents.
Review
The set is checked against the selected codes.
Report
Prioritized issues with references you can act on before submission.
Every issue includes a drawing reference and code citation
Each flagged issue includes the drawing sheet and detail reference where the problem appears, along with the exact section of the relevant code. That makes the report easier to act on because your team can see what failed, where it failed, and what standard triggered the issue.
Teams that want broader pre-submission coverage can combine this review with AI plan check or architectural review. To see how other teams have used InspectMind on live projects, browse case studies.
Open building codes checkerFrequently asked questions
What building codes does InspectMind AI support?
InspectMind supports IBC 2018, 2021, and 2024; IFC, IMC, IPC, and IECC; NFPA 13, 70, 72, and 101; ADA Standards; ASHRAE; California Building Code 2019 and 2022 (2025 in progress); Florida Building Code 2023; and North Carolina Building Code 2024. Custom code uploads are also available for local amendments and owner standards.
Can I upload my own local amendments or owner standards?
Local amendments, owner standards, and project-specific PDF requirements can be uploaded directly. InspectMind includes them in the review alongside the baseline code set.
How long does a building code compliance review take?
Most reviews are returned within hours, depending on drawing set size and complexity.
Who is this checker for?
This checker is built for architects, structural, civil, and MEP engineers, contractors, code consultants, developers, and teams preparing permit submissions.
What file types can I upload?
You can upload PDF construction drawings, specifications, and related supporting documents. No BIM model or IFC file is required.
How is this different from a municipal plan review?
InspectMind is a private-sector pre-submission review tool. It helps teams catch likely violations before the set reaches the authority having jurisdiction, but it does not replace the official AHJ review.
Is there a free trial?
InspectMind is available from $50 per upload with no subscription required. Enterprise pricing is available for teams with ongoing review volume.
Catch code issues before permit review
Upload PDF drawings for AI building code review. Results in hours—with citations for every finding.
5+ issues guaranteed or full refund — no questions asked
From $50, cheaper than one RFI. No per-user fees. Share with your entire team. Invoice available for enterprise.
See sample report (282 issues found)
Not sure yet? Upload a completed project you already know — see what we catch. Most teams validate, then roll out across every job.
Upload all project PDFs: drawings, specs, codes, checklists, shop drawings, submittals, contracts, zoning codes, city comments. AI checks everything against everything.
187,000+ issues caught across 500+ engineering and construction firms
One issue found pays for the whole check